Barley, S. R. (1988). Technology, power, and the social organization of work. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 6, 33-80.
2.
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12, 76-95.
3.
Berg, M. (1997). Of forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: Some tools for a sociology of the formal. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 22, 403-433.
4.
Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2006). Institutions and technology: Frameworks for understanding organizational change—The case of a major ICT outsourcing contract. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 110-126.
5.
Button, G. (1993). The curious case of the vanishing technology. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies in work, interaction, and technology(pp. 10-28). London: Routledge.
6.
Constantinides, P., & Barrett, B. (2006). Large-scale ICT innovation, power, and organizational change: The case of a regional health information network. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 76-90.
7.
Fuller, L. L. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92, 394-404.
8.
Gerson, E., & Star, S. L. (1986). Analyzing due process in theworkplace. ACMTransactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 257-270.
9.
Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse(pp. 299-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Harley, B., Wright, C., Hall, R., & Dery, K. (2006). Management reactions to technological change: The example of enterprise resource planning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 58-75.
11.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technology, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441-456.
12.
Jones, M. (1999). Information systems and the double mangle. In T. J. Larsen, L. Levine, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems: Current issues and future changes(pp. 287-302). New York: Omni Press.
13.
Kellogg, K., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (in press). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organization Science.
14.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
15.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
16.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12, 121-134.
17.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Piotti, B., Chilundo, B., & Sahay, S. (2006). An institutional perspective on health sector reforms and the process of reframing health information systems: Case study from Mozambique. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 91-109.
19.
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10, 167-185.
20.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.
21.
Wagner, E. L., & Newell, Sue. (2006). Repairing ERP: Producing social order to create a working information system. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 40-57.
22.
Woolgar, S., & Grint, K. (1991). Computers and the transformation of social analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 368-381.