Episodic attempts at organizational change have proven to be unable to keep pace with continuous change. The challenge of emergent and continuous change calls for newways of understanding time, particularly with regards to knowing the future. This article begins by reviewing classic organizational change theory in terms of its underlying temporal assumptions along with its epistemological stance toward effecting change in time. Drawing on the ideas of Henri Bergson, an alternative view of time as a dynamic flow— or duration—is presented, suggesting that linear, detached, and episodic methods lack knowledge of the future as a temporal dynamic and that popular visioning approaches that rely on future perfect assumptions fail to engage that dynamic directly. The authors propose that the future is unconditioned, what they refer to as the future infinitive. Knowing the future directly through deep improvisation bypasses sense making in favor of cultivating presence and acting in real time.
Ackoff, R.
(1981). Creating the corporate future: Plan or be planned for. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Barrett, F. J.
(1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9, 605-622.
3.
Barrett, F. J.
(2000). Cultivating an aesthetic of unfolding: Jazz improvisation as a self-organizing system. In S. Linstead & H. J. Hopfl (Eds.), The aesthetics of organizations(pp. 228-245). London: Sage.
4.
Beckhard, R.
(1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Bennis, W.
, Benne, K. D., Chin, R.,& Corey, K. E. (1976). The planning of change(3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6.
Bergson, H.
(1944). Creative evolution(A. Mitchell, Trans.). New York: Modern Library. (Original work published 1911)
7.
Bluedorn, A.
(2002). The human organization of time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Bohm, D.
(1995). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.
9.
Bohm, D.
(2003). The essential Bohm. London: Routledge.
10.
Boulding, E.
(1976). Learning to image the future. InW. Bennis, K. D. Benne, R. Chin,& K. E. Corey (Eds.), The planning of change(3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
Brown, S. L.
, & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and timepaced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
12.
Bunker, B. B.
,& Alban, B. (1992). Editor's introduction: The large group intervention—A new social innovation?Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 473-479.
13.
Burke, W. W.
(1982). Organization development: Principles and practices. Toronto, Canada: Brown.
14.
Burrell, G.
(1992). Back to the future. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations(pp. 165-183). London: Sage.
15.
Chandler, D.
,& Torbert, W. (2003). Transforming action inquiry: Interweaving 27 flavors of action inquiry. Action Research, 1, 133-152.
16.
Choo, C. W.
(2002). Sensemaking, knowledge creation and decision making: Organizational knowing as emergent strategy. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), Strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge(pp. 79-88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Crossan, M.
, Cunha, J. V., Vera, D., & Cunha, M. P. (2002, June). Time and organizational improvisation: Kairos meets Chronos. Paper presented at the Dynamic Time and Creative Inquiry in Organizational Change conference, Cape Ann, MA.
18.
Crossan, M. M.
, Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Klus, L. (1996). The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity, Organizational Dynamics, 24, 20-35.
19.
Cunha, M. P.
(2002, July). Foresight at time traveling: Complexity, improvisation and organizational foresight. Paper presented at Probing the Future: Developing Organizational Foresight in the Knowledge Economy conference, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
20.
Das, T. K.
(1986). The subjective side of strategy making: Future orientations and perceptions of executives. New York: Praeger.
21.
Das, T. K.
(2002, July). Strategizing and time: Recognizing the future. Paper presented at Probing the Future: Developing Organizational Foresight in the Knowledge Economy conference, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
22.
Davis, S.
(1996). Future perfect. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Drucker, P.
(1997). The future has already happened. Harvard Business Review, 75, 20-24.
24.
Fenner, P.
(2001). Essential wisdom teachings. York Beach, ME: Nicolas-Hays.
25.
Fenner, P. (2003a). Deconstructive contemplation. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
Fenner, P.
(2003b). Nonduality and therapy. In J. Pendegrast, P. Fenner,& S. Krystal (Eds.), The sacred mirror: Nondual wisdom and psychotherapy(pp. 23-56). St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
27.
Fonseca, J.
(2002). Complexity and innovation in organizations. London: Routledge.
28.
Ford, J. D.
,& Backoff, R. (1988). Organization change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. Quinn& K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management(pp. 81-121). New York: Harper.
29.
Ford, J. D.
, & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19, 756-785.
30.
French, W. L.
, & Bell, C. H. (1999). Organization development(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Gersick, C. J.
(1991). Revolutionary change theories: Amultilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10-36.
32.
Greenwood, R.
, & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 3, 1052-1083.
33.
Hamel, G.
, & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
Hatch, M. J.
(2000, August). Jazz time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
35.
Huy, Q.
(2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26, 601-624.
36.
James, W.
(1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
37.
Kotter, J. P.
(1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 2, 59-67.
38.
Lewin, K.
(1951). Field theory and social science. New York: Harper and Brothers.
39.
Lewin, K.
(1958). Group decision and social change. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology(pp. 197-211). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
40.
Li Destri, A. M.
,& Dagnino, G. B. (2003, May). Monotemporalism versus pluraltemporalism: Concepts of time and the strategic theory of the firm. Paper presented at the In Search of Time conference, ISIDA, Palermo, Sicily.
41.
Low, A.
(1993). The butterfly's dream. Rutland, VT: Tuttle Publishing.
42.
Low, A.
(2002). Creating consciousness: A study of consciousness, creativity, evolution and violence. Ashland, OR: White Cloud Press.
43.
Marshak, R. J.
(1993). Lewin meets Confucius: A re-view of the OD model of change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 393-415.
44.
Miller, D.
, & Freisen, P. (1984). Organizations: A quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Nagel, T.
(1974). What is it like to be a bat?Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450.
46.
Orlikowski, W. J.
(1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63-92
47.
Petranker, J.
(2003a). Inhabiting conscious experience: Engaged objectivity in the first-person study of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(12), 3-23.
48.
Petranker, J.
(2003b). What is creative inquiry. Retrieved November 30, 2003, from www.creativeinquiry.org/what-is/
49.
Porras, J.
, & Collins, J. (2002). Built to last. New York: Harper Business.
50.
Porras, J. I.
, & Silvers, R. C. (1991). Organization development and transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 51-78.
51.
Purser, R. E.
(2002). Contested presents: Critical perspectives on “real time” management. In B. Adam, R. Whipp, & I. Sabelis (Eds.), Making time: Time and management in modern organizations(pp. 155-167). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
Purser, R. E.
, Bluedorn, A.,& Petranker, J. (2004). Time and causes of flow in organizational change. In R. Woodman& W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 15). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53.
Purser, R. E.
,& Petranker, J. (2000, August). Timescapes in management. All-Academy symposium presentation at the Academy of Management conference A New Time, Toronto, Canada.
54.
Robertson, P. J.
, Roberts, D. R., & Porras, J. I. (1993). An evaluation of a model of planned organizational change, In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development(Vol. 7, pp. 1-39). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
55.
Sanders, T. I.
(1998). Strategic thinking and the new science. New York: Free Press.
56.
Sastry, M. A.
(1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 237-275.
57.
Scharmer, C. O.
(2000, May). Presencing: Learning from the future as it emerges. Paper presented at the Conference on Knowledge and Innovation, Helsinki School of Economics, Finland.
58.
Scharmer, C. O.
(2002). Presencing: A social technology of freedom. Trigon Themen, 2, 1-4.
59.
Schreyogg, G.
, & Noss, C. (2000, August). Reframing change in organizations: The equilibrium logic and beyond. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
60.
Schutz, A.
(1972). The phenomenology of the social world(G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). London: Heinemann Educational Books. (Original work published 1932)
61.
Senge, P.
(1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Currency-Doubleday.
62.
Simon, H. A.
(1976). Administrative behavior(3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
63.
Stacy, R.
(1996). Managing the unknowable. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Toffler, A.
(1970). Future shock. New York: Bantam Books.
65.
Torbert, W.
(2002). Learning to exercise timely action now. Retrieved November 30, 2003, from torbert@ bc.edu
66.
Tulku, T.
(1987). Love of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: Dharma Publishing.
67.
Tulku, T.
(1994). Dynamics of time and space: Transcending limits on knowledge. Berkeley, CA: Dharma.
68.
Tushman, M. L.
, & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior(Vol. 7, pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
69.
Van de Ven, A. H.
,& Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organization. Academy of Management Review, 20, 510-540.
70.
Varela, F.
, & Shear, J. (Eds.). (1999). The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness [Special issue]. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2/3).
71.
Varela, F.
, Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Wiebe, E.
,& Gordon-Biddle, K. (2002, June). Change in time, time in change: Addressing temporal dualism in the study of organizational change. Paper presented at the Dynamic Time and Creative Inquiry in Organizational Change conference, Essex, MA.
73.
Weick, K. E.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing(2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
74.
Weick, K. E.
, & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-386.
75.
Weisbord, M.
(1988). Productive workplaces. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
76.
Wheatley, M.
(1992). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Khoeler.
