Using real-time longitudinal survey and interview data, the authors assessed explicit and tacit knowledge flows within a small manufacturing firm for an indispensable employee (IE). They then compared those flows to the flows for a replacement employee (RE) who took over after the IE became ill. As expected, they found that (a) explicit and tacit knowledge outflows to coworkers were greater for the IE than for the RE, and (b) tacit knowledge inflows from coworkers were slightly greater for the RE than for the IE. Explicit knowledge inflows from coworkers were not consistently greater for the RE than for the IE. Surprisingly, the loss of the IE did not have a negative impact on the firm's productivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acar, W., & Burns, A. (2001). The grey areas of knowledge management and the long shadow of the tacit-explicit dichotomy. In M. Crossan& F. Olivera (Eds.), Organization learning and knowledge management (pp. 5-18). London: University of Western Ontario.
2.
Aeppel, T. (2002, July 1). On factory floor, top workers hide secrets to success. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A10.
3.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1501-1569.
4.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
5.
Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 487-506.
6.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
8.
Brown, R. B., & Woodland, M. J. (1999). Managing knowledge wisely: A case study in organizational behaviour. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(2), 175-198.
9.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
10.
Cook, S. D., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373-390.
11.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
12.
Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
de Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data. London: Sage.
14.
Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 357-365.
15.
Hambrick, D. C. (1981). Environment, strategy and power within top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 253-276.
16.
Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies theory of interorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
17.
Jobson, J. D. (1991). Applied multivariate data analysis (Vol. 1). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 33, 37-50.
19.
KPMG Management Consulting. (1998). Knowledge management: Research report. Unpublished report by KPMG.
20.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1-13.
22.
Matthews, J., & Shulman, A. D. (2001). Questioning knowledge transfer and learning processes across R & D project teams. In M. Crossan& F. Olivera (Eds.), Organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 405-414). London: University of Western Ontario.
23.
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-131.
24.
Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304-337.
25.
Mischke, G., Dyck, B., Starke, F. A., & Mauws, M. K. (1999, August). Learning to build a car: An empirical investigation of organizational learning. Paper presented at the Academy of Management national meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
26.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14-37.
27.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, T. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Polanyi, M. (1997). The tacit dimension. In L Pruzak (Ed.), Knowledge in organizations (pp. 135-146). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
29.
Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661-681.
30.
Smith, E. (1985, October 7). Turning an expert's skills into computer software. Business Week, pp. 104-107.
31.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
32.
Tasi, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business units innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
33.
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11-25.
34.
von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133-153.
35.
Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge (pp. 159-184). New York: Harper & Row.
36.
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
