This study examines the outcomes of a large-scale Multistakeholder Collaborative Roundtable (MCR) on environmental protection. The findings shed a considerably more realistic light on the concrete outcomes of MCRs than does the image portrayed by the literature and some practitioners. We observed that consensus was achieved, albeit on general principles only. Various types of learning did occur, but they were limited to networking competencies. Problem solving was detected, albeit in the form of incremental innovation only. Overall, the major result of the MCR studied was that it contributed “small wins” to its initial grand objective. The case illustrates the paradox of MCRs. It teaches us that we should be cautious about their real potential to help solve complex collective problems. Yet, it shows that MCRs do serve a useful purpose, that of giving direction to “metaproblems, ” a result that apparently can hardly be attained otherwise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andranovich, C.
(1995). Achieving consensus in public decision making: Applying interest-based problem solving to the challenges of intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(4), 429-442.
2.
Babin, R. (1995). Les enjeux de la régulation écologique: des contraintes du marchéà l’action des citoyens [Ecological governance: From market constraints to citizens’ actions]. Unpublished manuscript. New Brunswick, Canada: Université de Moncton.
3.
Barouch, G.
(1989). La décision en miettes, Systèmes de pensée et d’action à l’oeuvre dans la gestion des milieux naturels [Decisions in pieces, logics and action systems in the management of natural resources]. Paris: Édition l’Harmattan.
4.
Callon, M.
(1993). Comment décider en situation d’ignorance [How to decide when facing ignorance]. In M. Beaud, C. Beaud, & M. L. Bouguerra (Eds.), L’état de l’environnement dans le monde [The state of the environment in the world] (pp. 294-296). Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
5.
Clarke, S. F.
, & Roome, N. (1999, August). Sustainable business: Learning-action networks as organizational assets. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, GA.
6.
Denis-Lempereur, J.
(1993). Les sources, les rejets des industries [Industrial pollution sources]. In M. Beaud, C. Beaud, & M. L. Bouguerra (Eds.), L’état de l’environnement dans le monde [The state of the environment in the world] (pp. 94-96). Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
7.
Denzin, N. K.
, & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Driscoll, C. (1995). Diversity, dialogue, and learning: The case of the forest roundtable on sustainable development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
9.
Driscoll, C.
(1996). Fostering constructive conflict management in a multistakeholder context: The case of the forest roundtable on sustainable development. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(2), 156-172.
10.
Eisenberg, E. M.
, & Witten, M. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 418-426.
11.
French, H. F.
(1995). Partnership for the planet: An environmental agenda for the United Nations (Paper 126). Washington, DC: Worldwatch.
12.
Gray, B.
(1985). Conditions facilitating inter-organizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911-936.
13.
Gray, B.
(1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Gray, B.
, & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
15.
Hoffman, A. J.
, Gillepsie, J. J., Moore, D. A., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1999). A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254-1276.
16.
Huxham, C.
(1991). Facilitating collaboration: Issues in multi-organizational group decision support in voluntary, informal collaborative settings. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42(12), 1037-1045.
17.
Huxham, C.
(1993). Collaborative capability: An intra-organizational perspective on collaborative advantage. Public Money & Management, 13(3), 21-28.
18.
Kelman, S.
(1992). Adversary and cooperationist institutions for conflict resolution in public policymaking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(2), 178-206.
19.
Latour, B.
(1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes—Essai d’anthropologie symétrique [We never were moderns—Symmetrical anthropology essay]. Paris: La Découverte.
20.
Logsdon, J. M.
(1991). Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 23-37.
21.
Long, F. J.
, & Arnold, M. B. (1995). The power of environmental partnerships. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
22.
Michael, D.
(1973). Learning to plan, planning to learn. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Miles, M. B.
, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook of qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Ostanello, A.
, & Tsoukiàs, A. (1993). An explicative model of ‘public’ inter-organizational interactions. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 67-82.
25.
Pasquero, J.
(1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 38-64.
26.
Porter, D. R.
, & Salvesen, D. A. (1995). Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27.
Roberts, N. C.
, & Bradley, R. T. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 209-227.
28.
Roome, N. J.
(1998a). Conclusion: Implications for management practice, education, and research. In N. J. Roome (Ed.), Sustainability strategies for industry (pp. 259-276). Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
Roome, N. J.
(1998b). Introduction: Sustainable development and the industrial firm. In N. J. Roome (Ed.), Sustainability strategies for industry (pp. 1-23). Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
Schmidheiny, S.
(1992). Changing course. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Séguin, M.
(1994). Le scandale des déchets au Québec [The waste scandal]. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Les Editions Eco-société.
32.
Selsky, J. W.
(1991). Lessons in community development: An activist approach to stimulating interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 91-115.
33.
Sharfman, M. P.
, Gray, B., & Yan, A. (1991). The context of interorganizational collaboration in the garment industry: An institutional perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 181-208.
34.
Smith Ring, P.
, & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483-498.
35.
Smith Ring, P.
, & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.
36.
Trist, E.
(1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36(3), 269-284.
37.
Turcotte, M. -F.
(1997). La prise de décision par consensus: un cas en environnment [Consensual decision making: A case in environment]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
38.
Waddock, S. A.
(1989). Understanding social partnership, an evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 21(1), 78-100.
39.
Weick, K. E.
(1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40-49.
40.
Wood, D. J.
, & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139-162.
41.
Yin, R. K.
(1994). Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
