Using a case study of an integrated information technology services firm, the author examines how the interplay between culture, structure, and leadership is managed in order to build control and employee loyalty. The author focuses on the salient features of the case, namely that a high-profile culture combines with a low-profile leadership and with minimal structuring to create a vibrant and loyalty-generating organizational environment. The author proposes that these processes are effective because they reinforce one another. It is their articulation, not their existence, that acts both as an unobtrusive control mechanism and as an employee loyalty–generating process, fulfilling the needs of both the organization and its professionals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvesson, M.
(1995). Management of knowledge-intensive companies. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2.
Alvesson, M.
(2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 1101-1123.
3.
Alvesson, M.
(2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54, 863-886.
4.
Barker, R. A.
(2001). The nature of leadership. Human Relations, 54, 469-494.
5.
Bartlett, C. A.
(1996). McKinsey & Company: Managing knowledge and learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6.
Brown, S. L.
, & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
7.
Chell, E.
(1998). Critical incident technique. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (pp. 51-72). London: Sage Ltd.
8.
Cunha, M. P.
, & Cunha, J. V. (2001). Managing improvisation in cross-cultural virtual teams. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1, 187-208.
9.
Denison, D. R.
, Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in management leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524-540.
10.
Deshpandé, R.
, Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.
11.
Dess, G. M.
, & Picken, J. C. (2000, Winter). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, pp. 18-34.
12.
Dougherty, D.
, Borrelli, L., Munir, K., & O’Sullivan, A. (2000). Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 321-355.
13.
Eisenstat, R.
, Foote, N., Galbraith, J., & Miller, D. (2001). Beyond the business unit. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 54-63.
14.
Etzioni, A.
(1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Flanagan, J. C.
(1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
16.
Gabriel, Y.
(1999). Organizations in depth. London: Sage Ltd.
17.
Giddens, A.
(1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Griffin, A.
, & Hauser, J. (1993). The voice of the customer. Management Science, 12, 1-27.
19.
Hatch, M. J.
(1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies, 20, 75-100.
20.
Kamoche, K.
, & Cunha, M. P. (2001). Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies, 22, 733-764.
21.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R.
(2001). Creating authentizotic organizations: Well-functioning individuals in vibrant organizations. Human Relations, 54, 101-111.
22.
Kunda, G.
(1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
23.
Locke, K.
(2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Lowendhal, B. R.
, Revang, O., & Fosstenlokken, S. M. (2001). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54, 911-931.
25.
McGill, M.
, & Slocum, J. W. (1998, Winter). A little leadership, please?Organizational Dynamics, pp. 39-49.
26.
Meister, D.
(1982, Fall). Balancing the professional service firm. Sloan Management Review, pp. 15-29.
27.
Mintzberg, H.
(1998, November-December). Covert leadership: Notes on managing professionals. Harvard Business Review, pp. 140-147.
28.
Morris, T.
, & Empson, L. (1998). Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 23, 609-624.
29.
Quinn, R. E.
, & Spreitzer, G. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 115-142.
30.
Scarbrough, H.
, & Swan, J. (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: The role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12, 3-12.
31.
Schneider, B.
(1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-454.
32.
Starbuck, W. H.
(1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 713-740.
33.
Von Hippel, E.
(1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429-439.
34.
Webber, A. M.
(1993, January-February). What’s so new about the new economy?Harvard Business Review, pp. 24-42.
35.
Weick, K. E.
(1999). The aesthetic of improvisation in orchestras and organizations. In M. P. Cunha & C. A. Marques (Eds.), Readings in organization science: Organizational change in a changing context (pp. 541-563). Lisbon, Portugal: ISPA.
