DuhemPierreKoyréAlexandrePanofskyErwinKoenigsbergerDorothyYatesFrancesJardineNicholasGingerichOwen, and some of my own early writings.
2.
Pepper'sStephenWorld hypotheses (1942); White'sHaydenMetahistory (1973); Eco'sUmbertoA theory of semiotics (1976); Greimas'sAlgirdasOn meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory (1987); Ricœur'sPaulThe rule of metaphor (1975); and Genette'sGerardPalimpsestes (1982); Reiss'sTimothyThe discourse of Modernism (1982). See the recent, excellent essay review of Hallyn by ClarkWilliam, “Poetics for scientists”, Studies in history and philosophy of science, xxiii (1992), 181–92.
3.
“… interested in assembling parts to describe specific phenomena rather than in the organic unity of the whole” (p. 153).
4.
Hallyn offers here an unpersuasive, generic reference to Redondi'sPietroGalileo eretico (1983).
5.
See WestmanRobert S., “Nature, art, and psyche: Jung, Pauli and the Kepler-Fludd polemic”, in VickersBrian (ed.), Occult and scientific mentalities in the Renaissance (Cambridge, 1984), 177–229.