Supposing uniform motion, we define an azimuthal angular velocity ωAz = (180° — A)/τ where A is the azimuth of the rising sun and τ half the time during which the sun stays above the astronomical horizon (this time can be easily obtained by knowing the times of sunrise and sunset). After the time τ the sun attains its meridian altitude β = 90° — ϕ + where ϕ represents the geographic latitude and is the declination of the sun. We also define an altitudinal angular velocity ωAlt = β/τ. The azimuthal angle 180° — A — α, where a is the angular deviation of the shrine axis from astronomical south, is therefore swept by the sun at the time t0 = (180° — A — α)/ωAz after sunrise. On the other hand, during this time t0 the sun attains the altitude β* = toωAlt, or β* = [1 — α(180° — A)−1]β which, because of the symmetry of the solar path with respect to the local meridian, precisely equals the altitude of the sun's passage across the alignment line. Thus, such a passage of the sun takes place at the time t* = t0 + (2α/ωAz), that is, t* = [1 + α(180° — A)−1]τ, after sunrise. In the case of the winter solstice at the Monolithic Temple we have = −23°26′, ϕ = 18°57′10“N and α = 35′. The azimuth A is given by A = arc cos(sin /cosϕ) = 114°51′52” (see for example Woolard and Clemence, 1966) and from the Malinalco times trise = 7h 07m, tset = 18b 06m (Flores, personal communication, 1987) it follows that τ = 1/2(tset — trise) = 5 hours 29.5 minutes. Finally, we obtain β = 47°36′.8, β* = 47°11′ and t* = 5 hours 32.4 minutes; i.e. at tcagle = trise + t* = 12h 39m.4 the sunlight will illuminate the head of central eagle. However this statement can be true only if the height of the door has a minimal value given by H = d tanβ* where d denotes the light's minimal reach, that is, the distance between the eagle's head and the exterior edge of the door. Taking into account the measured value d = 2.70m, we obtain H = 2.91m.
2.
We have used sinδ = sinϕ cosz + cosϕ sinz cos A, where δ, ϕ, z and A denote the declination, the geographic latitude, the zenith distance (z = 90° — h, where h is the altitude) and the azimuth respectively (see for example Woolard and Clemence, 1966). We took into account a horizon altitude of h = 3° 15′ and an azimuth of A = 105°31′ (Iwaniszewski, personal communication, 1987) for the vertex of the right-angle defined by the mountain cut. Furthermore the altitude of the horizon was corrected for the effect of atmospheric refraction by subtracting 20′ from it to get the true altitude of the rising sun (Aveni, 1980, 105). Taking ϕ = 18°57′10“N and z = 90°–2°55′ = 87°.0833 we find the solar declination for the date on which the sunrise event occurs is = — 13°39′. Consulting the ephemeris data (Flores, 1988) we obtain the dates 12 February and 29 October.
3.
Our exploration of the cut consisted basically of visual and tactile examination of the stone wall. Whereas some portions of the wall clearly have a natural appearance, other portions are composed of relatively smooth surfaces. However, we consider that a solid-matter specialist is required to give a definitive verdict. Access to the cave is difficult on account of the steepness of the wall and the overgrown vegetation. Indeed, only one member of our survey team was able to reach the cave and enter it! The cave is rather a narrow, shallow fissure in the rock. No surface material was visually detected inside or near the entrance, nor did our archaeologist find any surface material at the footing of the wall. Of course, a more thorough study of the wall and the cave needs to be carried out.
4.
AguileraCarmen1989“The Mexica leap year once again” in World archaeoastronomy, ed. by AveniA. F. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), 227–31.
5.
AveniAntonyF.1980Skywatchers of ancient Mexico (University of Texas Press, Austin and London).
6.
BrodaJohanna1977Malinalco: Santuario solar y calendárico de los aztecas, unpublished manuscript.
7.
CasoAlfonso1967Los calendarios prehispánicos (Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City).
8.
CastilloVíctorFarreras M.1971“El bisiesto náhuatl”, Estudios de cultura Náhuatl (Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM, Mexico City), ix, 75–104.
9.
CoeMichaelD.1975“Native astronomy in Mesoamerica” in Archaeoastronomy in Precolumbian America, ed. by AveniA. F. (University of Texas Press, Austin), 3–31.
10.
Del Pasoy TroncosoFrancisco1882“Ensayo sobre los símbolos cronográficos de los mexicanos”, Anales del Museo Nacional de México, ii, 323–402.
11.
DuránDiegoFray1967Historia de las Indias de Nueva España, ed. by GaribayA. M. (Editorial Porrúa, Mexico City).
12.
FloresG.Daniel1988Anuario del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional para 1989, editor (Ephemeris Dept, Astronomical Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City).
13.
GarcíaPavónJosé1946“Los monumentos arqueológicos de Malinalco”, Revista Mexicana de estudios antropológicos, viii, 5–63.
14.
1958Malinalco: Official guide (INAH, Mexico City).
15.
“Historia de los Mexicanos por sus pinturas”1882“Historia de los Mexicanos por sus pinturas”, Anales del Museo Nacional de México, ii, 85–107.
16.
JiménezMorenoWigberto1961“Diferente principio del año entre diversos pueblos y sus consecuencias para la cronología prehispánica”, El México antiguo, ix, 137–52.
17.
KirchhoffPaul1954“Calendarios tenochca, tlaltelolca y otros”, Revista Mexicana de estudios antropológicos, xiv, 257–67.
18.
KelleyDavidH.1980“Astronomical identities of Mesoamerican gods”, Archaeoastronomy (Supplement to Journal for the history of astronomy), no. 2, S1–54.
19.
KrickebergWalter1949Felsplastik und Felsbilder bei den Kulturvölkern Altamerikas, i (Palmen Verlag, Berlin), 123–97.
20.
MendozaRubén1976“World view and the monolithic temples of Malinalco, Mexico: Iconography and analogy in Pre-columbian architecture”, Actes du XLIIe Congrès International des Americanistes (Société des Americanistes, Paris), 63–80.
21.
RomeroJavierQuiroz1987Solsticio de invierno en Malinalco (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico).
22.
Sahagúnde BernardinoFray1979Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España, annotated by A. M. Garibay K. (Editorial Porrúa, Mexico City).
23.
TenaRafael1987El calendario Méxica y la cronografía (Colección Científica no. 161, INAH, Mexico City).
24.
TorquemadaJuanFray1975De los veinte y un libros rituales y Monarquía Indiana (1723, ed. by PortillaLeón M. (3 vols, Editorial Porrúa, Mexico City).
25.
TownsendRichardF.1982“Malinalco and the Lords of Tenochtitlan” in The art and iconography of late post-classic central Mexico, ed. by BooneHill E. (Trustees for Harvard University, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.), 111–40.
26.
De OrdenTudelaJosé1980Códice Tudela (Ediciones de Cultura Hispánica, Madrid), 61–63.
27.
WoolardEdgarW.ClémenceGerald M.1966Spherical astronomy (Academic Press, New York and London).