LongomontanusChristian Severinus F., Astronomica Danica (Amsterdam, 1622). Professor Nathan Sivin has suggested that to some extent Longomontanus may have influenced the compilation of the Ch'ung-Chen Li-Shu (see his “Copernicus in China”, Studia Copernicana, vi (1973), 63–122, p. 108).
3.
BernardH., Monumenta Serica, iii (1938), 35.
4.
Ibid., 67.
5.
VerhaerenH., Catalogue de la bibliothèque du Pé-t'ang (Peking, 1949), no. 2124.
6.
PiaoChiao-Shih, chap. 9 (HFSS, chap. 80), 1a.
7.
d'EliaP. M., Galileo in China (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), 32–33.
8.
WWLC, chap. 4 (HFSS, chap. 39), 1b.
9.
MoesgaardK. P., “How Copernicanism took root in Denmark and Norway”, Studia Copernicana, v (1972), 117–51.
10.
WWLC, chap. 6 (HFSS, chap. 41), 3a-7. For the original discussions in the West, see HartnerW., “The Mercury horoscope of Marcantonio Michiel of Venice”, Vistas in astronomy, i (1955), 84–138, and SchofieldC. J., “The geoheliocentric mathematical hypothesis in sixteenth-century planetary theory”, The British journal for the history of science, ii (1965), 291–6.
KeplerJ., Astronomia nova (Heidelberg, 1609), chap. 7; DreyerJ. L. E., Tycho Brahe (Edinburgh, 1890), 294.
13.
Li-ChihYueh-Li, chap. 2 (HFSS, chap. 29), 9b.
14.
KeplerJ., Astronomiae pars optica (Gesammelte Werke, ii, ed. by HammerF. (Munich, 1939), 234–47) on the one hand, and L-ChihChiao-Shih, chap. 1 (HFSS, chap. 64), 22a–27b, on the other.