As developed in my forthcoming book, The Milky Way: An elusive road for science, to be published by Neale Watson of New York, and in my article, which surveys its first three chapters, “The Milky Way before Galileo”, Journal for the history of astronomy, ii (1971), 161–167. Here too, only the most essential references will be given.
2.
Kepler's Conversation with Galileo's Sidereal Messenger, translated with an introduction by RosenE. (New York, 1965), 36.
3.
Much of that polemic literature is reprinted in the Edizione nazionale of Galileo's works, iii (Florence, 1892).
4.
See IacchaeusG., Institutiones physicae (Leiden, 1614); MuleriusN., Institutionum astronomicarum libri duo (Groningen, 1616): BlaeuW. J., Tweevoudigh Onderwiis (Amsterdam, 1620), better known in its Latin translation, Institutio astronomica (Amsterdam, 1634).
5.
See BartholinusC., De mundo and Uranologia (Copenhagen, 1617).
6.
See LicetoF., De novis astris (Venice, 1622); AversaR., Philosophia (Rome, 1625); FromondusL., Meteorologicorum libri sex (Antwerp, 1627).
7.
See BlancanoJ., Sphaera mundi (Bologna, 1620); LereuchonJ., Récréation mathématique (Paris, 1624).
8.
See Werke, ed. CasparM., vii (Munich, 1953), 44–45.
9.
Ibid., 288.
10.
DescartesR., Le monde, ou Traité de la lumière, in Oeuvres, ed. Adam and Tannery, xi, Part 2 (Paris, 1909), 107.
11.
In “Préface pour le Traité du Vide”, in PascalB., Oeuvres complètes, ed. ChevalierJ. (Paris1954), 534.
Letter of August 1625 to Galileo, in Opera, vi, 4–6.
16.
WilkinsJ., Discovery of a world in the Moone (London, 1640), 179. On Fromondus see ref. 6.
17.
WardSeth, De cometis (Oxford, 1653), 24.
18.
ComeniusA., Physicae ad lumen divinum reformatae synopsis (Amsterdam, 1643), 92.
19.
See CottunioJ., Lectiones in primum Aristotelis librum de meteoris (Bologna, 1631); TrimarchiG., Disputationes in libros Aristotelis meteororum (Genoa, 1637); MastriusB., Disputationes in libros de caelo et mundo et metheoris (Venice, 1640); Fernandez-BejarnoF. M., Super quatuor libros meteororum Aristotelis quaestiones (Lyons, 1643); BérigardC., Circulus Pisanus Claudii Berigardii … de veteri et peripatetica philosophia Aristotelis (Utini, 1643); CabeoN.In quatuor meteorologicorum Aristotelis commentaria (Rome, 1646).
20.
See, for instance, de Roy (Regius)Henry, Fundamenta physices (Amsterdam. 1646) and RohaultJ., Traité de physique (Paris, 1671), both of which were not only treatises of physics but general accounts of the cosmos as well.
21.
StrauchE., Astrognosia (Wittenberg, 1659), 114.
22.
HalleyE., Catalogue des estoilles australes (Paris, 1679), [4] and [32].
23.
von GuerickeOtto, Experimenta nova (Amsterdam, 1672), 226–229 and 29–34.
24.
Discursus de via lactea (Helmstadt, 1665). Dissertations of those times carried more prominently the name of the professor presiding at the defence, than the name of the candidate for the degree. Often these works were quoted under the name of the praeses-professor who in this case was Sigismund Hosemann.
25.
HertzbergerJonas (praes.: Andreas Glauchius), Theoria viae lacteae (Leipzig, 1663) and WexstedtOlaus (praes.: Georg Funccius), De galaxia seu circulo lacteo (Rostock, 1686).
26.
See translation by RendellJ. R. and TansleyI. (London, 1912), 257–258.
27.
See reprint edition with an introduction by HoskinM. A. (London, 1971), 39–40.