For an overview of how every generation attached cultural and political importance to the invention of printing, see FloodJohn, “On Gutenberg's 600th anniversary: Towards a history of jubilees of printing”, Journal of the Printing Historical Society, n.s., i (2000), 5–36. Strasbourg as the origin of printing is advocated, for example, in WimphelingJacob, “Epithoma Germanorum”, in Wittekindus of Korvey, Saxonis rerum ab Henrico et Ottone I Imp. Gestarum Libri III (Basel: J. Hervagius, 1532), chap. 65, p. 375.
2.
Reproduced in EisermannFalkHonemannVolker, “Die ersten typographischen Einblattdrucke”, Gutenberg Jahrbuch, 2000, 88–131, p. 109, fig. 9.
3.
Incunabular single-sheet prints are listed in Kommission für den der WiegendruckeGesamtkatalog, Einblattdrucke des XV Jahrhunderts: Ein bibliographisches Verzeichnis (Halle a. S, 1914). For a good selection of these calendars, see HeitzPaulHaeblerKonrad, Hundert Kalendar Inkunabeln (Strasburg, 1905).
4.
MatthäusKlaus, “Zur Geschichte des Nürnberger Kalenderwesens: Die Entwicklung der in Nürnberg gedruckte Jahreskalender in Buchform”, Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, ix (1969), 965–1395, col. 983.
5.
For example, a single-sheet almanac for 1530 (Jaspar Laet the Younger, Almanach and prognostication for 1530 (Antwerp: C. Ruremende, [1529]), British Library, C.18.2.3.(43)) measures 29.3 × 43.5 cm, and Rembert Dodoens's almanac booklet for 1541 (DodoensRembert, Almanack des Jaers ons heeren .xvc en xlj. jaer den meridiaen des Graefschaps en stadt van Mechelen (Antwerp: Jan Cock, [1540]), in several uncut sheets, Cambridge University Library, Sel.7.10), sixteen leaves in 16mo, used paper that amounted to 40 × 29 cm.
6.
For this genre, see RosenfeldHellmut, “Kalender, Einblattkalender; Bauernkalender und Bauerenpraktik”, Bayerisches Jahrbuch für Volkskunde, 1962, 7–24, and “Bauernkalender und Wandkalender als literarisches Phaenomenon des 16 Jahrhundert und ihre Verhältnis zur Bauernpraktik”, Gutenberg Jahrbuch, 1963, 88–96.
7.
Incomplete copy, bound with the Almanach in Cambridge University, Syn.8.57.139.
8.
For examples of different formats of calendars, see BosanquetEustace F., English printed almanacks and prognostications: A bibliographical history to the year 1600 (London, 1917). For a social history of calendars, see CappBernard, Astrology and the popular press: English almanacs 1500–1800 (London and Boston, 1979).
9.
NolthiusAndreas, Almanach Auff das Jar Christ. 1575 (Erfurt: E. Mechler, 1574), not listed in Verzeichnis der im deutschen Sprachraum erschienenen Drucke des 16. Jahrhunderts (25 vols, Stuttgart, 1983), commonly known as VD16, and now available at http://gateway-bayern.bib-bvb.de/aleph-cgi/bvb_suche?sid=VD16.
10.
A useful introduction to the format of the Book of Hours is WieckRoger S. (ed.), The book of hours in medieval art and life (London, 1988).
11.
For the calendrical and lunar parameters used in early modern calendars, see HamelJürgenRothenbergEckeland, “Astronomisch-Kalendarische Tafel für Inkunabel- und Frühdruckforscher”, in Einblattdrucke des 15. und frühen 16. Jahrhunderts: Probleme, Perspektiven, Fallstudien, ed. by HonemannVolker (Tübingen, 2000), 479–94. For calendrical conventions in general, see BlackburnBonnieHolford-StrevensLeofranc, The Oxford companion to the year: An exploration of calendar customs and time-reckoning (Oxford, 1999). I have found GrotefendHermann, Taschenbuch der Zeitrechnung des deutschen Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (Hanover, 1898) valuable for locating obscure local saints.
12.
For the astronomical basis of calendars, see CoyneG. V.HoskinM. A.PedersenO. (eds), Gregorian Reform of the Calendar: Proceedings of the Vatican Conference to commemorate its 400th anniversary 1582–1982 (Vatican City, 1983).
13.
Another (conventional) cycle used was a fifteen-year cycle known as the “indiction” cycle, called the “Römer Zinszahl”, referring to its original use as a financial or taxation cycle. It also helped to disambiguate years in chronology.
14.
Nolthius, Almanach, [2v]. Indiction number for 1575 is 3.
15.
Grotefend, op. cit. (ref. 11), 43.
16.
For the Alfonsine Tables, I follow PoulleEmmanuel, Les tables Alphonsines avec les canons de Jean de Saxe (Paris, 1984), and GingerichOwen, “The Alphonsine tables in the age of printing”, in De astronomia Alphonsi Regis, ed. by ComesM.AguilarR. PuigSamsóJ. (Barcelona, 1987), 89–95.
17.
DobrzyckiJerzy, “The tabulae resolutae”, in De astronomia Alphonsi Regis, ed. by ComesAguilarPuigSamsó (ref. 16), 71–77. Cf. copies of Campanus of Novara's Theorica planetarum, which included volvelles for each planetary orbit that functioned as “analogue computers” or, at the very least, teaching devices, PedersenOlaf, “The Corpus astronomicum and the traditions of medieval Latin astronomy”, Studia Copernicana, iii (1975), 57–96, p. 80.
18.
It was customary until then to give planetary positions for every four to ten days, ZinnerErnst, Regiomontanus: His life and work, transl. by BrownEzra (New York, Oxford and Tokyo, 1990), 117. See StöfflerJohannesPflaumJacob, Almanach nova (Ulm: J. Reger, 1499) and StöfflerJohannes, Ephemeridum … a capite anni redemptoris Christi. MD.XXXII. in alios XX proxime subsequentes… ad ueterum imitationem accuratissimo calculo elaboratum (Tübingen: U. Morhard, [1531]) for the years 1506 to 1532.
19.
He added redundant tables to his new tables so that compilers of almanacs familiar with the older Alfonsine tables could perform all the steps in an analogous manner, see GingerichOwen, “The role of Erasmus Reinhold and the Prutenic tables in the dissemination of Copernican theory”, Studia Copernicana, vi (1973), 43–62.
20.
For the limitation of the Prussian tables, see GingerichOwen, “The accuracy of ephemerides 1500–1800”, Vistas in astronomy, xxviii (1985), 339–42. For Lutheran interest in Copernican improvements, but not his cosmology, see WestmanRobert S., “The Melanchthon circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg interpretation of the Copernican theory”, Isis, lxvi (1975), 164–93; KusukawaSachiko, The transformation of natural philosophy: The case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge, 1995), 171–3.
21.
For the extent to which the Alfonsine Tables were used to calculate calendrical parameters, see KremerR., The practice of Alfonsine astronomy in the fifteenth century: A survey of incunable calendars and almanacs, forthcoming.
22.
NorthJohn D., “The reluctant revolutionaries: Astronomy after Copernicus”, Studia Copernicana, iii (1975), 169–84.
23.
Nolthius, Practica (1574), [Aiv]v.
24.
MethuenCharlotte, “Maestlin's teaching of Copernicus: The evidence of his university textbook and disputations”, Isis, lxxxvii (1996), 230–47, p. 234.
25.
KremerRichard (personal communication) confirms that Nolthius's Almanach for 1575 did indeed use the Prussian tables.
26.
In 1587, Nolthius wrote to Johannes Hennichius from Einbeck: ColerJacob (ed.), Epistolarum libellus (Frankfurt a. M.: J. Feyerabendt, 1587), 29–30. For Nolthius's publications, see ref. 44.
27.
SudhoffKarl, “Lasstafelkunst in Drucken des 15. Jahrhunderts”, Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin, i (1908), 219–88, p. 238.
28.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 238–40.
29.
PerkinsWilliam, Foure great lyers, striuing who shall win the siluer whetstone Also, a resolution to the countri-man, prouing is vtterly vnlawfull to buye or vse our yeerly prognostications (London: R. Walde-Grave, 1583); the four almanacs are identified as by Buckminster, Frende, Twyne and Dade in Bosanquet, op. cit. (ref. 7), 49.
30.
HeitzHaebler, op. cit. (ref. 3), 12.
31.
A German almanac for 1481, British Library, IC.5903; for Hord, see also Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 237.
32.
HeitzHaebler, op. cit. (ref. 3), no. 62.
33.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 271; SchottenloherKarl, “Dr Balthasar Mansfeld, ein Münchener Arzt des 15 Jahrhunderts”, Das Bayerland, xxv (1913), 128–9.
34.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 258.
35.
German almanac for 1514, British Library, C.18 e.3.(33). Faber became Doctor of Medicine on 13 June 1497, WickersheimerErnest, “La prenostication nouvelle pour 1504 de Bernard de la Forest et la Grant Prenostication nouvelle pour 1515 de Wenceslas Fabri”, Bibliothèque d'humanisme et Renaissance, xvii (1955), 394–404, p. 401.
36.
German almanac for 1521, British Library, C.18.e.3.(29).
37.
Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 1014.
38.
LaetAlfonsus, Almanach for 1548 (London: R. Jugge, [1547]). British Library, C.18.e.3.(44). For the Laet family's impact on English almanacs, see Bosanquet, op. cit. (ref. 7), 18–29.
39.
DryanderJohannes, German almanac for 1538 ([Marburg], Hans Faust, [1537]), British Library, C.18.e.3.(30).
40.
StraussWalter, The German single-leaf woodcut 1550–1600: A pictorial catalogue (3 vols, New York, 1975), iii, 888–9.
41.
Normally, the professional qualification is some type of physician, but for an almanac by a surgeon, see Bosanquet, op. cit. (ref. 7), 25.
42.
Kremer, The practice of Alfonsine astronomy (ref. 21).
43.
For Anton Sorg's unauthorised use of Joss Hord's name, see Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 26), 247. For Brunfels, see ChapmanAllan, “Astrological medicine”, in Health, medicine and mortality in the sixteenth century, ed. by WebsterCharles (Cambridge, 1979), 275–300, p. 277.
44.
According to VD16 (ref. 9), Nolthius published the Observatio und Beschreibung des Newen Cometen (Erfurt: E. Melcher, 1573), Observatio und Beschreibung des Newen Cometen (Erfurt: G. Baumann, 1578), a Schreibkalender for 1580 (Erfurt: G. Baumann, 1579), Practica for the years 1579 and 1581, all printed the previous year by G. Baumann, and a Practica for 1582, without information on the printer.
45.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 224–5. For an overview of humoral medicine, SiraisiNancy, Late medieval and early Renaissance medicine (Chicago, 1990).
46.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 225.
47.
“Sabbato et dominica post Dionisii bona pro iuvenili et virili melancolico preter tibias/vz medicina in omnibus.”HeitzHaebler, op. cit. (ref. 3), no. 6.
48.
“An Samstag und Sontag nach dionisii gut den iungen an die shinbein.”HeitzHaebler, op. cit. (ref. 3), no. 5.
49.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 265. Different complexions were distinguished in a German calendar for 1526 with “c” for cholerics, “f” for phlegmatics, “m” for melancholics, German almanac for 1526 (fragment), British Library C.18.e.3(37).
50.
HoffmannL., “Almanache des 15 und 16 Jahrhunderts und ihre Käufer”, Beiträge zur Inkunabelkunde, 3rd ser., viii (1983), 130–43, pp. 131–4.
51.
Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 982.
52.
Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 240–1, 254–5.
53.
For depictions of blood-letting, cupping at a bath, and taking medicinal drinks, see the scenes represented at the bottom of almanacs, HeitzHaebler, op. cit. (ref. 3), nos. 77 and 82, Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 273.
54.
WehrliGustav Adolf, Die Bader, Barbiere und Wundärtze im alten Zürich (Zürich, 1927), 9–13 (‘dry’ baths used a combination of steam and herbs, and a bundle of birch or oak branches with leaves was used to stroke the body to cause perspiration). HimmelsbachIso, ‘Von wegen der Badstuben…’: Zur Geschicht des Freiburger Badewesens von 1300 bis 1800 (Freiburg i. Br., 2000), 30–2. For the social history of the bath owners and barbers working at the baths in Vienna, see MaurerRudolf, Baden, Schröpfen, Amputieren: Die Geschichte der Baden in Baden bei Wien (Vienna, 2004).
55.
Müller-JahnckeWolf-Dieter, “Medizin und Pharmazie in Almanachen und Kalendern der frühen Neuzeit”, in TelleJoachimHickelErika (eds), Pharmazie und der gemeine Mann: Hausarznei und Apotheke in der frühen Neuzeit (Weinheim, 1988), 35–42. Siraisi, op. cit. (ref. 45), 146–7.
56.
ThorndikeLynn, A history of magic and experimental science (8 vols, New York and London, 1923–58), iv, 139–40. Cf. also the crosses and half-crosses in Jaspar Laet's almanac for 1510, Bosanquet, op. cit. (ref. 7), 146, fig. XXII.
57.
The earliest almanac of this kind that I have seen is the almanac for 1509, printed in Nuremberg by HuberWolf and compiled by TanstetterGeorg (1482–1535). GeisbergMax, The German single-sheet woodcut: 1500–1550, ed. by StraussWalter L. (4 vols, New York, 1974), iii, 833, no. G889. For Tannstetter as a compiler of calendars, see Graf-StuhlhoferFranz, Humanismus zwischen Hof und Universität: Georg Tantstetter (Collimitius) und sein wissenschaftliches Umfeld im Wien des frühen 16 Jahrhunderts (Vienna, 1996), 140–2.
58.
LaetJaspar, the Younger, Almanach and prognostication for 1530 (Antwerp: C. Ruremende, 1529), British Library, C.18 e.3 (43).
For the cyphers used for numbers, see SorbelloAlessandro“Un calendario xilografato per l'anno 1531 (Ulm, Matthias Hoffischer)”, Gutenberg Jahrbuch, 1998, 154–64. These conventions, of course, date back to the conventions in perpetual calendars. See also Bosanquet, op. cit. (ref. 7), figs II and III.
62.
For Eber, see ThüringerW., “Paul Eber (1511–1569): Melanchthons Physik und seine Stellung zu Copernicus”, in Melanchthon in seinen Schuelern, ed. by ScheibleHeinz (Wiesbaden, 1997), 185–321.
63.
EberPaul, Calendarium historicum (Wittenberg: Johannes Crato, 1573), 14. For the uses of astronomy in chronology, see GraftonAnthony, Joseph Scaliger: A study in the history of classical scholarship (2 vols, Oxford, 1983–93), ii, 459–88.
64.
EberPaul, Calendarium historicum (Wittenberg: Johannes Crato, 1573), 136. For the reception of the Attic calendar, see GraftonAnthonySwerdlowNoel M., “Calendar dates and ominous dates in ancient historiography”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, li (1988), 14–42.
65.
For instance, EberPaul, Calendarium historicum (Wittenberg: haer. J. Cratonis, 1579), Trinity College Library, Cambridge, U.13.8.
“Postremo unusquisque suum et suorum domesticorum diem natalem, et alios dies, insignitos aliquibus in vita casibus, Calendario cum fructu inscribet.” Eber, op. cit. (ref. 63), 18.
68.
For Luther's position on images, see now KoernerJ. L., The reformation of the image (London, 2003); for Luther's use of images, see ScribnerR. W., For the sake of simple folk: Popular propaganda for the German Reformation (Cambridge, 1981); for Lutheran grapho-relics, see RublackU., Reformation Europe (Cambridge, 2005), 146–69; for Calvinists' attitudes towards the visual arts, see FinneyP. C. (ed.), Seeing beyond the word: Visual arts and the Calvinist tradition (Grand Rapids, 1999).
69.
Here, I follow the insights in KolbRobert, For all the saints: Changing perceptions of martyrdom and sainthood in the Lutheran Reformation (Macon, CA, 1987), and “Festival of the saints in late Reformation Lutheran preaching”, The historian, lii (1990), 613–26.
70.
Kolb, All the saints (ref. 69), 27–33.
71.
See for example, SchoenfeldVictorinus, Almanach auff das 1575 Jahr (Wittenberg: s.p., [1574]), Cambridge University Library, Syn.8.57.139(4), which commemorates Lutheran events.
72.
Neue Deutsche Biographie (23 vols, Berlin, 1953–), ix, 540–1.
73.
For a cultural history of time, see BorstA., The ordering of time: From the ancient computus to the modern computer (Cambridge, 1993), and for the ritual calendar, see MuirE., Ritual in early modern Europe (Cambridge, 1997), 55–80.
74.
WestmanRobert S., “Copernicus and the prognosticators: The Bologna period, 1496–1500”, Universitas, December 1993, 1–5, p. 2.
75.
Jean Avis produced almanacs for 40 years in the fifteenth century for the faculty of medicine. Thorndike, op. cit. (ref. 56), iv, 141–2.
76.
“Instructio modica ne vulgus secundum generales minutionum tabulas absque consilio periti medici phlebothomiam faciat.” The full text is transcribed in Sudhoff, op. cit. (ref. 27), 283–7.
77.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 138–9; KolbW., Geschichte des anatomischen Unterrichts an der Universität zu Basel, 1460–1900 (Basel, 1951), 8–9.
78.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 139.
79.
StehlinKarl, “Regesten zur Geschichte des Buchdrucks 1501–1520: Aus den Basler Archiven”, Archiv für Geschichte des Deutschen Buchhandels, xiv (1891), 10–98, pp. 86–7.
80.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 139.
81.
Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 1017.
82.
Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 1020. See also SchönerJohannes, Tabulae astronomicae, quas vulgo, quia omni difficultate et obscuritate carent resolutas vocant (Nuremberg, 1536), in which he offered easy rules and tables for mathematical and astrological calculations necessary for compiling almanacs.
83.
Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 1021.
84.
For the relatively small number of university-educated physicians in relation to a variety of medical practitioners and healers of the period, see the examples of London and Norwich in PellingM.WebsterC., “Medical practitioners”, in Health, medicine and mortality in the sixteenth century, ed. by WebsterCharles (Cambridge, 1979), 165–235.
85.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 141.
86.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 141–2; SchottenloherKarl, Das Regensburger Buchgewerbe im 15 and 16 Jahrhunderts (Mainz, 1920), 118–19.
87.
Hoffmann, op. cit. (ref. 50), 141.
88.
StraussGerald, Nuremberg in the sixteenth century (New York, London and Sydney, 1966), 58–9.
89.
For coinage and wages in Nuremberg, see Strauss, op. cit. (ref. 88), 204–5. Cf. SchmitzW., Die Kölner Einblattdrucke des 15 Jahrhunderts (Cologne, 1979), 65, where a fifteenth-century single-sheet print (for government mandates) would have cost 1 d.
90.
For the price of broadsides, I have used the calculation in WeberBruno, Wunderzeichen und Winkeldrucker 1543–1586: Einblattdrucke aus der Sammlung Wikiana in der Zentralbibliothek Zürich (2 vols, Zurich, 1972), i, 30.
91.
For the cost of a bath at Freiburg i. Br., see Himmelsbach, op. cit. (ref. 54), 32.
92.
MadanFalconer, “Day-book of John Dorne, Bookseller in Oxford, A.D. 1520”, in FletcherCharles R. L. (ed.), Collectanea I. First series (Oxford, 1885), 71–177, pp. 116, 133.
93.
Madan, op. cit. (ref. 92), 80, 96.
94.
Leedham-GreenElisabeth S., Books in Cambridge inventories: Book-lists from the Vice-Chancellor's court probate inventories in the Tudor and Stuart periods (2 vols, Cambridge, 1986), i, 335, no. 364. See also a bill for 5 dozen “Almanacks” for 6 shillings, issued by a London booksller in 1583, Robert Jahn, “Letters and booklists of Thomas Chard (or Chare) of London, 1583–4”, The library, 4th ser., vi (1923), 219–37, p. 221.
95.
RogersArthur G. L.RogersJames E. T., A history of agriculture and prices in England from the year after the Oxford Parliament (1259) to the commencement of the Continental War (1793) (8 vols, Oxford, 1866–1902), iii, 623, 642.
96.
Studio of Pieter Brueghel II, “Der Bauernadvocat” (1620), ErtzKlausNitz-ErtzChrista, Pieter Breughel der Jüngere — Jan Brueghel der Ältere: Flämische Malerei um 1600: Tradition und Fortschritt (exhibition catalogue) (Lingen, Luca and Essen, 1997), no. 137, pp. 404–5; BosseAbraham, “L'étude du procureur” (1633); Maxime Préaud, Les effets du soleil: Almanacs du régime de Louis XIV (Paris, 1995), 26, fig. II.
97.
First noted in Matthäus, op. cit. (ref. 4), col. 992.
98.
ErastusThomas, De astrologia divinatrice (Basel: A. Perna, 1580), 1.
99.
See the example of a manual of household regimen which refers the readers to almanacs for the days to take purgatives: “The best tyme of purgacions is the spring tyme, as the docters doth affirme: The apt daies et signes are commonly knowen in the English Almanacks, calculated into English.” BulleinWilliam, A newe booke entituled the gouernement of healthe (London: John Day, 1558), [sig. xxxr], misnumbered as sig. xxxiir, also noted in Chapman, op. cit. (ref. 43), 297. The article by Richard L. Kremer on “Experimenting with paper instruments in fifteenth- and sixteenth-century astronomy: Computing syzygies with isotemporal lines and salt dishes” will be published in our May issue.