See, for example, Philip's great world atlas (London, 1994).
2.
“Cosmografo della Serenissima Republica, e Professore di Geografia Nell'Universita di Venetia”, titlepage of CoronelliVincenzo, Atlante veneto, nel quale si contiene la descrittione geografica, storica, sacra, profana, e politica, degl'imperii, regni, provincie, e stati dell'universo, loro divisione, e confini, coll'aggiunta di tutti li paesi nuovamente scoperte, accresciuto di molte tavole geografiche, non più publicate (Venice, 1691). Two copies of this 1691 reissue of the 1690 Atlante veneto have formed the basis of this study; for a brief account of the publishing history of the work, see ArmaoErmanno, Vincenzo Coronelli: Cenni sull'uomo e la sua vita catalogo ragionato delle sue opere lettere – fonti bibliografiche – indice (Florence, 1944), 100–6. Throughout, references given are to editions consulted, which are not necessarily the first editions of those works.
3.
“Ad uso dell'accademia cosmografica degli Argonauti”, titlepage of Coronelli, Atlante veneto (ref. 2).
4.
Armao, Vincenzo Coronelli (ref. 2), 29–30.
5.
For a more detailed account of the forms of Renaissance cosmography, see MosleyAdam, “The cosmographer's role in the sixteenth century: A preliminary study”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, lix (2009), 423–39.
6.
KarrowRobert W., Mapmakers of the sixteenth century and their maps: Bio-bibliographies of the cartographers of Abraham Ortelius, 1570 (Chicago, 1993), 216–49.
7.
BrótonsVictor Navarro, “Astronomy and cosmography 1561–1625: Different aspects of the activities of Spanish and Portuguese mathematicians and cosmographers”, in SaraivaLuísLeitãoHenrique (eds), The practice of mathematics in Portugal (Coimbra, 2004), 225–74; PortuondoMariá M., Secret science: Spanish cosmography and the New World (Chicago, 2009).
8.
FioraniFrancesca, The marvel of maps: Art, cartography and politics in Renaissance Italy (New Haven, 2005).
9.
McLeanMatthew, The Cosmographia of Sebastian Münster: Describing the world in the Reformation (Aldershot, 2007).
10.
BerggrenJ. LennartJonesAlexander, Ptolemy's Geography: An annotated translation of the theoretical chapters (Princeton, 2000), 5–17. For Sacobosco, see, of course, ThorndikeLynn, The Sphere of Sacrobosco and its commentators (Chicago, 1949).
11.
See, on these, MüllerKathrin, Visuelle Weltaneignung: Astronomische und kosmologische Diagramme in lateinischen Handschriften des 11. bis frühen 14. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen, 2008).
12.
ThevetAndré, La cosmographie universelle (Paris, 1575), 2v; see also CellariusAndreas, Atlas coelestis seu harmonia macrocosmica (Amsterdam, 1661), plate 11.
13.
HodgenMargaret T., “Sebastian Muenster (1489–1552): A sixteenth-century ethnographer”, Osiris, xi (1954), 504–29, p. 514; Thevet, Cosmographie universelle (ref. 12); François de Belleforest, La cosmographie universelle de tout le monde (Paris, 1575).
14.
See, for one example, MosleyAdam, “Early modern cosmography: Fine's Sphaera mundi in content and context”, in MarrAlexander (ed.), The worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, instruments and print in Renaissance France (Donington, 2009), 114–36.
15.
See Mosley, “The cosmographer's role” (ref. 5), 435–7.
16.
The Atlas was placed on the Index in 1603; see de BujandaJesus Martinez, Index librorum prohibitorum 1600–1966 (Sherbrooke, 2002). Coronelli, in the catalogue of authors in his Atlante veneto (ref. 2), tells us that it was chapter 18 of Mercator's account of the creation and fabric of the world, and what it had to say about ‘original sin’, that attracted censure.
17.
BlaeuJoan, Atlas maior, sive cosmographia blaviana (Amsterdam, 1662), sig. a2 v, sig. c r – sig. f v.
18.
van GentRobert, Cellarius atlas: The divine sky — History's most beautiful celestial atlas (Harmonia macrocosmica of 1660) (Cologne, 2007), 9–10.
CoronelliVincenzo, Epitome cosmografica, o compendiosa introduttione all'astronomia, geografia, & idrografia, per l'uso, dilucidatione, e fabbrica delle sfere, globi, planisferi, astrolabi, e tavole geografiche, e particolarmente degli stampati (Cologne, 1693); Armao, Vincenzo Coronelli (ref. 2), 189–92.
ArmaoErmanno, Il “catalogi degli autori” di Vincenzo Coronelli: Una bibliografia geografica del '600 (Florence, 1957).
24.
MünsterSebastian, Cosmographiae universalis (Basle, 1552), sig. 6v; McLean, Cosmographia of Sebastian Münster (ref. 9), 59, 270, 304.
25.
“… arduo, e laborioso cimento di rappresentare il Mondo intero, quale per sentimento del Grand'Aristotele, altro non e, ch'un unione del Cielo, e della Terra”; “una scienza Matematica, che spiega la figura, la grandezza, il luogo, il moto, e l'illumination del Mondo, e delle sue Parti, servendosi delli principii tanto estrinseci, desonti dali puri Matematici, Aritmetici, e Geometrici, quanto intrinseci, e proprii, come sono le Fenomene, o l'Apparenze, & Osservationi”, Coronelli, Atlante veneto (ref. 2), 1–2.
26.
PedersenOlaf, “The theorica planetarum literature of the Middle Ages”, Classica et mediaevalia, xxiii (1962), 225–32.
27.
Thorndike, op. cit. (ref. 10), 141–2.
28.
MaurolycoFrancesco, Cosmographia in tres dialogos (Venice, 1543), 24r, 77r–79r.
29.
MercatorBartholomaeus, Breves in sphaeram meditatiunculae, includentes methodum et isagogen in universam cosmographiam, hoc est, geographiae pariter atque astronomiae initia ac rudimenta suggerentes (Cologne, 1563); sig. i4 r; BarozziFrancesco, Cosmographia in quatuor libros distributa, summo ordine, miraque facilitate, ac brevitate ad magnam Ptolemaei mathematicam constructionem, ad universamque astrologiam instituens (Venice, 1598), 235; Cellarius, Atlas (ref. 12), plate 14. For an example of the theoricae diagrams, and an explanation of their significance, see JardineNicholas, “The significance of the Copernican orbs”, Journal for the history of astronomy, xiii (1982), 168–94, pp. 169–70.
30.
de la CharlonyeGabriel, De sphaera mundi sive de cosmographia libri II (Tours, 1593), 7r–7v; MerulaPaul, Cosmographiae generalis libri tres (Amsterdam, 1605), 211.
31.
See the discussion in HeningerS. K.Jr, The cosmographical glass: Renaissance diagrams of the universe (San Marino, 1977), 58–80; for an example of a world-map depicting the world-systems of Ptolemy and Copernicus side-by-side, the 1660 map of Fredrick de Wit, see AllenPhilip, An atlas of atlases (London, 2005), 78–9.
32.
BiancaniGiuseppe, Sphaera mundi, seu cosmographia demonstrativa, ac facile methodo tradita (Modena, 1635), 27, 33.
33.
Blaeu also included the system of Andrea Argoli; see Blaeu, Atlas maior (ref. 17), sig. c v – sig. c2 r; Cellarius, Atlas (ref. 12), plates 1, 4, 6.
AllenPhilip, Atlas of atlases (London, 2005), 78–9.
36.
See SwerdlowN. M.NeugebauerO., Mathematical astronomy in Copernicus's De revolutionibus (New York, 1984), 127.
37.
BraheTycho, De mundi aethereis recentioribus phaenomenis (Uraniborg, 1588), 189.
38.
See Le monde de Mr Descartes, ou le traité de la lumière et des autres principaux objets des sens (Paris, 1664), 116, for the more recognizable image of the Cartesian cosmos.
39.
Armao, Vincenzo Coronelli (ref. 2), 198–9.
40.
For an introduction to at least some of the concepts employed here, see BartonTamsyn, Ancient astrology (London, 1994), 92–102; AckermannSilke, “Astrological scales on the National Maritime Museum astrolabes”, in van CleempoelKoenraad (ed.), Astrolabes at Greenwich (Oxford, 2005), 73–89.
41.
ApianPeter, Cosmographicus liber (Landshut, 1524), sig. + v, where an aspectarium forms part of the “Instrumentum noctis”; Maurolyco, Cosmographia (ref. 28), 46v; Barozzi, Cosmographia (ref. 29), 293; Cellarius, Atlas (ref. 12), plate 15.
42.
Apian, Cosmographicus liber (ref. 41), 19. See also Cellarius, Atlas (ref. 12), plate 16; ProctorDavid, “The construction and use of the astrolabe”, in van Cleempoel (ed.), Astrolabes (ref. 40), 15–22, p. 20.
43.
See, on this instrument, Vanden BroeckeSteven, “Dee, Mercator, and Louvain instrument making: An undescribed astrological disc by Gerard Mercator (1551)”, Annals of science, lviii (2001), 219–10. I am grateful to Stephen Johnston for suggesting this as a possible precursor to Coronelli's Idea.
44.
The same astrological disc provided the basis for scales on an astrolabe made by Thomas Gemini; see Ackermann, “Astrological scales” (ref. 40), 82–4.
See, on these, Ackermann, “Astrological scales” (ref. 40), 76–9.
51.
For some examples, see Maurolyco, Cosmographia (ref. 28), 86v; Blundeville, Exercises (ref. 49), 148r; Barozzi, Cosmographia (ref. 29), 324; Biancani, Sphaera mundi (ref. 32), 195.
52.
BarkerPeter, “The optical theory of comets from Apian to Kepler”, Physis, xxx (1993), 1–25.
53.
For one such example, from Cuningham'sWilliamThe cosmographicall glasse, see Heninger, Cosmographical glass (ref. 31), 178.
54.
For an example, from GiraultSimon, Globe du monde (Langres, 1592), see Heninger, Cosmographical glass (ref. 31), 9.
55.
Apian, Cosmographicus liber (ref. 41), 56; Maurolyco, Cosmographia (ref. 28), 16r; DodonaeusRembertus, Cosmographica in astronomiam et geographiam isagoge (Antwerp, 1548), sig. Eii r; Mercator, Breves in sphaeram meditatiunculae (ref. 29), sig. g2 r; Barozzi, Cosmographia (ref. 29), 21.
56.
RobbinsF. E. (ed. and transl.), Ptolemy: Tetrabiblos (Cambridge, MA, 1940), 82–7.
57.
See Heninger, Cosmographical glass (ref. 31), 116–24.
58.
There is only a superficial relationship to tidal rotae of the kind discussed in HughesPaul, “Implicit Carolingian tidal data”, Early science and medicine, viii (2003), 1–24, which relate the lunar month to tide cycles.
Apian, Cosmographicus liber (ref. 41), 53; ApianPeter, Cosmographiae introductio: Cum quibusdam geometriae ac astronomiae principiis ad eam rem necessariis (Venice, 1533), 17v; Maurolyco, Cosmographia (ref. 28), 39v, 40r; Mercator, Breves in sphaeram meditatiunculae (ref. 29), sig. g2 v; Blundeville, Exercises (ref. 49), 201v, 202v; Barozzi, Cosmographia (ref. 29), 111–13; Blaeu, Atlas maior (ref. 17), sig. fr; Coronelli, Epitome (ref. 20), plates between 22 and 23.
61.
DilkeO. A. W., Greek and Roman maps (Baltimore, 1998), 28–9, 31, 53, 110–11, 170; BerggrenJones, Ptolemy's Geography (ref. 10), 15.
62.
WaldseemüllerMartin, Cosmographiae introductio cum quibusdam geometriae ac astronomiae principiis ad eam rem necessariis (Saint Dié, 1507), facing sig. a iiii v.
63.
See ObristBarbara, “Wind diagrams and medieval cosmology”, Speculum, lxxii (1997), 33–84; de CallataÿGodefroid, “Géographies astrologiques et roses de vents”, in DeitzLuc (ed.), Tempus edax rerum: Le bicentenaire de la Bibliothèque Nationale de Luxembourg (1798–1998) (Luxembourg, 2001), 131–41.
64.
BerggrenJones, Ptolemy's Geography (ref. 10), 38–40, 112–16. Such an image, without the winds, can be seen on the titlepage of Apian, Cosmographiae introductio (ref. 60).
65.
Some commentaries on De sphaera addressed the winds; see Thorndike, Sphere of Sacrobosco (ref. 10), 320.
66.
Heninger, Cosmographical glass (ref. 31), 148–9.
67.
Apian, Cosmographicus liber (ref. 41), 53.
68.
This is one fault with the otherwise excellent Fiorani, The marvel of maps (ref. 8).
69.
E.g. KishGeorge, A sourcebook in geography (Cambridge, MA, 1978), 350.