Opere: Le Opere di Galileo Galilei. Edizione Nazionale. Edited by AntonioFavaro (20 vols, Florence, 1890–1909; reprinted 1929–39 and 1964–66).
2.
GalileoBelisarioVinta, 19 March 1610, Opere, x, 300.
3.
StillmanDrake, “Galileo's first telescopic observations”, Journal for the history of astronomy, vii (1976), 153–68, espec. pp. 158–9.
4.
Galileo to ?, 7 January 1610, Opere, x, 273–8, p. 277. Favaro thought the letter was addressed to AntoniodeMediciStillmanDrake thinks it is more probable that the addressee was EneaPiccolimini (Galileo at work (Chicago, 1978), 143–4). Drake has translated the entire letter in the article cited in ref. 2.
5.
Drake, Galileo at work, 148–52.
6.
GalileoGalilei, Sidereus nuncius or the Sidereal messenger, translated by Van AlbertHelden (Chicago, 1989), 67.
7.
MaginiG. A., Ephemerides coelestium motuum (Venice, 1582), f. 444v. Note that for his horoscope of de CosimoMediciII, prepared at about the same time, Galileo also used these Ephemerides (see OwenGingerich, Journal for the history of astronomy, xxi (1990), 369).
8.
Currently, there are several computer programs that will give the formation of Jupiter'sGalilean satellites for any given date; we have used BarbaraBecker's results from the Redshift program. Earlier, the calculations for the first week of Galileo's observations were made by JeanMeeus, “Galileo's first records of Jupiter's satellites”, Sky and telescope, xxiv (1963), 137–9.
9.
StillmanDrake, “Galileo gleanings XIII”, Physis, iv (1962), 342–4: “… decision to publish … made precisely at that time.”.
10.
GalileoBelisarioVinta, 30 January 1610, Opere, x, 280–1.
11.
Galileo's continuing desire to maintain a monopoly on astronomical discoveries is chronicled in MarioBiagioli, “Replication or monopoly? The economics of invention and discovery in Galileo's observations of 1610”, Science in context, xiii (2000), 547–93; reprinted in Galileo in context, edited by JürgenRenn (Cambridge, 2001), 277–320.
12.
Ibid., 280.
13.
GalileoBelisarioVinta, 14 February 1610, ibid., 283.
14.
MarcWelserChristopherClavius, 12 March 1610, ibid., 288.
15.
Opere, iii, 432–3.
16.
Ibid., 49. See also 50.
17.
ElizabethCavicchi, “Painting the Moon”, Sky and telescope, lxxxii (1991), 313–15.
18.
GuglielmoRighini, “New light on Galileo's lunar observations”, in Reason, experiment, and mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, edited by RighiniMaria Luisa BonelliWilliamR. Shea (New York, 1975), 59–76. See also GuglielmoRighini, Contributo alla interpretazione scientifica dell'opera astronomica di Galileo (Monografia, Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, Florence, 1978, no. 2).
19.
OwenGingerich, “Dissertatio cum Professore Righini et Sidereo Nuncio”, in RighiniBonelliShea (eds), op. cit. (ref. 17), 77–88.
20.
Drake, op. cit. (ref. 2).
21.
EwenA. Whitaker, “Galileo's lunar observations and the dating of the composition of ‘Sidereus Nuncius’”, Journal for the history of astronomy, ix (1978), 155–69.
22.
ZdeněkKopal, The Moon (Dordrecht, 1969), 225; KopalRobertW. Carder, Mapping of the Moon, past and present (Dordrecht, 1974), 4.
23.
JohannesHevelius, Selenographia sive Lunae descriptio (Gdansk, 1647), 205.
24.
Galileo'stelescopes had a field of view of about one-quarter of a degree and could therefore show only one-quarter of the lunar surface in one view. This was a handicap in efforts to map the Moon and it goes some way toward explaining inaccuracies, including those of Hevelius himself, before about 1650, when the astronomical telescope with its much larger field of view replaced the Galilean telescope in astronomical research.
25.
SamuelY. Edgerton, “Galileo, Florentine ‘Disegno’ and the ‘Strange Spottednesse’ of the Moon”, Art journal, xliv (1984), 225–32. See also van AlbertHeldenMaryG. Winkler, “Representing the heavens: Galileo and visual astronomy”, Isis, lxxxiii (1992), 195–217, and “Johannes Hevelius and the visual language of astronomy”, in Renaissance and revolution: Humanists, scholars, craftsmen, and natural philosophers in early modern Europe, ed. by FieldJ. V.FrankA. J. L. James (Cambridge, 1994), 97–116.
26.
Ibid.;TerrieBloom, “Borrowed perceptions: Harriot's maps of the Moon”, Journal for the history of astronomy, ix (1978), 117–22.
27.
MarioBiagioli, Galileo courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism (Chicago, 1993), passim.
28.
Galileo, op. cit. (ref. 1).
29.
Whitaker, op. cit. (ref. 20), 155.
30.
Ibid., 158.
31.
See MarioBiagioli, “Picturing objects in the making: Scheiner, Galileo and the discovery of sunspots”, Ideals and cultures of knowledge in early modern Europe, ed. by WolfgangDetelClausZittel (Berlin, 2002), 39–96.
32.
GalileoGalilei, Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti (1613), Opere, v, 71–249, esp. p. 102.
33.
The patchwork of insertions can be unpacked by following Galileo's system of special symbols in the manuscript printed in Opere, iii, 17–47.
34.
HD 32811 = SAO 76962 = Hip 23784.
35.
The horoscope was first dated by Gingerich, op. cit. (ref. 18), 88, and subsequently GuglielmoRighini pointed out that the date matched Cosimo'sBirthday, “L'Oroscopo Galileiano di Cosimo de' Medici”, Annali dell'Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze, i (1976), 29–36.