NewtonIsaac, Theory of the Moon's motion (1702), with a bibliographical and historical introduction by I. Bernard Cohen (London, 1975).
2.
Ptolemy's Almagest, translated and annotated by ToomerG. J. (Princeton, 1998), 173–216.
3.
RobertsV., “The solar and lunar theory of Ibn ash-Shatir: A pre-Copernican Copernican model”, Isis, xlviii (1957), 428–32; SalibaG., A history of Arabic astronomy (New York, 1994), 291–305.
4.
Nicholas Copernicus, On the Revolutions. Translation and commentary by RosenEdward (Baltimore, 1978), 191–5.
5.
WilsonCurtis, “Predictive astronomy in the century after Kepler”, in Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics, Part A, ed. by TatonR.WilsonC. (Cambridge, 1989), 161–206.
6.
Ibid., 166–71.
7.
NewtonIsaac, The Principia: A new translation and guide, by CohenBernard I.WhitmanAnne (Los Angeles, 1999).
8.
WestfallR. S., Never at rest: A biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge, 1980), 541.
9.
Newton, op. cit. (ref. 1), 41.
10.
Ibid..
11.
Wilson, op. cit. (ref. 6), 200.
12.
WhitesideD. T., “Newton's lunar theory: From high hope to disenchantment”, Vistas in astronomy, xix (1976), 317–28.
13.
Westfall, Never at rest (ref. 8), 547.
14.
WilsonCurtis, “Newton on the Moon's variation and apsidal motion: The need for a newer ‘new analysis’”, in Isaac's Newton natural philosophy, ed. by BuchwaldJed Z.CohenBernard I. (Cambridge, Mass., 2000), 139–88; NauenbergM., “Newton's perturbation methods for the three-body problem and their application to lunar motion”, ibid., 189–224; idem, “Newton's Portsmouth perturbation theory and its application to lunar motion”, in The foundations of Newtonian scholarship, ed. by DalitzR. H.NauenbergM. (London, 2000), 167–94.
15.
Wilson, op. cit. (ref. 5).
16.
The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton, vi: 1684–1691, ed. by WhitesideD. T. (Cambridge, 1974), 508–37.
17.
Nauenberg, opera cit. (ref. 14).
18.
In his conclusion, Kollerstrom quotes D' Alembert who “doubted whether this derivation of the annual equation was really sound”, p. 230: “Il en est quelques-unes que M. Newton dit avoir calculées par la Théorie de la gravitation, mais sans nous apprendre le chemin qu'il a pris pour y parvenir. Telles sont celles de 11′49” qui dépend de l'équation du centre du soleil.”.