Abstract
Responding to modern critiques that portray post-Anselmian soteriology as oppressive or blasphemous, this study reinterprets Christ’s satisfaction within Anselm’s ecclesial-monastic, rather than feudal, context. It examines Lonergan’s sacramental-penitential and Balthasar’s monastic-doxological interpretations of Christ’s satisfaction as complementary and mutually illuminating contributions toward analogically re-imagining a post-Anselmian soteriology. The essay culminates in proposing a synthetic analogy of ‘doxological conciliation’ that addresses contemporary concerns, clarifying its meaning in relation to Khaled Anatolios’s recently coined term, ‘doxological contrition.’
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
