Abstract
The author explores Coffey's Lonerganian method and conclusions, and suggests that, while it is important to have a contemporary doctrine of the immanent Trinity, Coffey's own starting point causes him to compromise some of the most important insights of the doctrine that he originally intended to uphold. Coffey's own natural theology, it is claimed, leads him to compromise both God's freedom in se and his free action ad extra by following Rahner's belief that love of neighbour is identical with love of God.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.