The Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region is enduring the wrath of the Anthropocene. Reports of unprecedented glacial melt, loss of biodiversity and interference in the watershed resulting from unguarded developmental projects, constructions, mining and tourism activities reveal how this geologically young landscape is under grave threat. Since transboundary environmental management is primarily a regional problem, this article problematizes South Asia’s regionalism and its institutions that deal with the HKH region. It analyses the securitisation of HKH as an ‘ecological’ threat by examining the ‘processes’ associated with two South Asia’s regional organizations—the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). The argument that this article advances is that South Asian regionalism has fallen short to accommodate the unique ecological interests of the HKH region because of the politically fraught origin and evolution of regional organizations in South Asia. These organizations exhibit an ‘intentional distance’ from the ecological concerns of the HKH. Finally, the article delineates a trans-Himalayan regionalism––a distinct socio-historical and institutionalized regional identity––from South Asian regionalism. Given the dismal political cooperation over the HKH thus far, the article presents a case for further research on the dynamic and dialectic regional-planetary relationships, and for cooperation and collective action in the region to ensure a sustainable and resilient future for the HKH and the planet.
AbrahamI. (2014). How India became territorial: Foreign policy, diaspora, geopolitics. Stanford University Press.
2.
AcharyaA. (2014). Constructing a security community in South East Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge.
3.
AliS., & ZiaA. (2016). Transboundary data sharing and resilience scenarios: Harnessing the role of regional organisations for environmental security. In AdeelZ. & WirsingR. (Eds.), Imagining industan. Springer.
4.
AusAID. (2010, October8). The changing face of the Himalayas. https://reliefweb.int/report/india/changing-face-himalayas
5.
BajracharyaS., MahajanS., ShresthaF., GuoW., LiuS., & ImmerzeelW. (2015). The glaciers of the Hindu Kush Himalayas: Current status and observed changes from the 1980s to 2010. International Journal for Water Resources Development, 31(2), 161–173.
6.
BajracharyraS., & ShreshthaB. (2011). The status of glaciers in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.
7.
BandyopadhyayJ. (1991). Mountain development plain bias. Himal Magazine, 4(1), 34.
8.
BandyopadhyayJ., & PerveenS. (2004a). Moving mountains up in the global environmental agenda. Centre for Development and Environmental Policy.
9.
BandyopadhyayJ., & PerveenS. (2004b). Emergence of and future steps for sustainable mountain development in the global environment agendas. In TrevesT., PineschiL., & FodellaA. (Eds.), Protection of mountain areas in international law. Giuffre.
10.
BhattacharyaJ. (2021). Old routes, new dreams: Reminiscences of the Southern Silk Road and Bengal-China connectivities. Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient, 64, 302–341.
11.
BhattacharyaJ. (2023, August17). SAARC vs BIMSTEC: The search for the idea platform for regional cooperation. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/research/saarc-vs-bimstec-the-search-for-the-ideal-platform-for-regional-cooperation
12.
BolchT., SheaJ., LiuM., AzamF., GaoY., GruberS., ImmerzeelW. W., KulkarniA., LiH., TahirA. A., ZhangG., & ZhangY. (2019). Status and change of the cryosphere in the extended Hindu Kush Himalayan region. In WesterP., MishraA., MukherjiA., & ShresthaB. (Eds.), The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment mountains, climate change, sustainability and people (pp. 209–255). Springer.
BuzanB., & WæverO. (2003). Regions and powers: The structures of international security. Cambridge University Press.
15.
BuzanB., WæverO., & de WildeJ. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner.
16.
CallicottJ. B. (1989). In defence of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. SUNY Press.
17.
CederlofG. (2009). Fixed boundaries, fluid landscapes: British expansion into North East Bengal in 1820s. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 46(4), 513–540.
18.
ChakmaB. (2020). The origins of SAARC. In ChakmaB. (Ed.), South Asian regionalism: The limits of cooperation. Bristol University Press.
19.
ChatterjeeR. (2019). Rethinking regionalism: The idea of China-South Asia transnational regional cooperation. Observer Research Foundation.
20.
ChaudharyS., UddinK., ChettriN., ThapaR., & SharmaE. (2022). Protected areas in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: A regional assessment of the status, distribution and gaps. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(10), e12793.
21.
ChettriN., ShakyaB., ThapaR., & SharmaE. (2008). Status of the protected areas system in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: An analysis of protected area coverage. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4(3), 164–178.
22.
DalbyS. (2022). Rethinking environmental security. Edward Elgar Publishing.
23.
DasS. (2023). Environmental security and India: Global concerns and national interests. Routledge.
24.
DavisA. (2023). The geopolitics of melting mountains: An international political ecology of the Himalaya. Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
DeudneyD. (1990). The case against linking environmental degradation and environmental security. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 461–476.
DossaniR., SneiderD. C., & SoodV. (2010). Does South Asia exist? Prospects for regional integration. Asia Pacific Research Centre, Brookings Institution.
28.
Down To Earth. (1992, August15). SAARC ratifies committee on environment. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/environment/saarc-ratifies-committee-on-environment-30046
29.
FalakJ. (2017). Implacable failures of the SAARC. Centre for Strategic and Contemporary Research.
30.
GautamP. K. (2011). Environmental security and regional cooperation: What is feasible? In ChandranS. & JeganaathanJ. (Eds.), Energy and environmental security: Country perspectives (p. 7). Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
31.
GordeevaE. (2022). The securitisation of global environmental policy: An argument against. European Journal of Security Research, 7, 5–20.
32.
HettneB., InotaiA., & SunkelO. (1999). Globalism and new regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
HettneB., & SoderbaimF. (2000). Theorising the rise of regions. New Political Economy, 5, 457–472.
34.
HoekstraJ., BoucherT., RickettsT., & RobertsC. (2005). Confronting a biome crises: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters, 8, 23–29.
35.
HurrellA. (2020). Regionalism in theoretical perspective. In FawcettL. & HurrellA. (Eds.), Regionalism in world politics (pp. 38–45). Oxford University Press.
36.
ICIMOD. (n.d.a). History. https://www.icimod.org/who-we-are/history-and-governance/
37.
ICIMOD. (n.d.b). Who we are. https://www.icimod.org/who-we-are
38.
IvesJ. (2006). Himalayan perceptions: Environmental change and the well-being of mountain peoples. Routledge.
39.
JacobH. (2016). The Kashmir uprising and India-Pakistan relations: A need for conflict resolution, not management. Asie Visions, 90. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/migrated_files/documents/atoms/files/kashmir_uprising_india-pakistan_relations_jacob_2016.pdf
40.
JacobH. (2024, July22). The end of South Asia. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/south-asia/end-south-asia
41.
JayaramD. (2022). ‘Climatizing’ military strategy? A case study of the Indian armed forces. In PoliticsT. C., AykutS., & MaertensL. (Eds.), The climatization of global politics (pp. 121–141). Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
LipschutzR. (1997). Environmental conflict and environmental determinism: The relative importance of natural and social factors. In GleditschN. (Ed.), Conflict and the environment. Springer.
43.
McDonaldM. (2008). Securitisation and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563–587.
44.
McShaneK. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care?Environmental Values, 16(2), 169–185.
45.
McSweeneyB. (1999). Security, identity and interests: A sociology of international relations. Cambridge University Press.
46.
MesserliB., & IvesJ. (1997). Mountains of the world: A global priority. Parthenon.
47.
MittermeierR., TurnerW., LarsenF., BrooksT., & GasconC. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: A critical role of hotspots. Springer.
48.
MoldenD., & SharmaE. (2013). ICIMODs strategy for delivering high quality research and achieving impact for sustainable mountain development. Mountain Research and Development, 33(2), 179–183.
49.
MurthyP. (2000). Relevance of SAARC. Strategic Analysis, 23(10), 1781–1796.
50.
MuzaffarM. (2017). SAARC: An evaluation of its achievements, failures, and compulsion for cooperation. Global Political Review, 2(1), 36–45.
51.
NepalS., & ShresthaA. (2015, March22). The Himalayas waters: Complex challenges and regional solutions. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. https://www.icimod.org/the-himalayan-waters-complex-challenges-and-regional-solutions
52.
NymanJ. (2016). What is the value of security? Contextualising negative/positive debate. Review of International Studies, 42(5), 821–839.
53.
O’DonnellM., Bolfrass (2020). The strategic postures of China and India: A visual guide. Belfast Centre.
54.
OlsonD., & DinertsteinE. (2002). The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89, 199–224.
55.
PachauJ., & van SchendelW. (2022). Entangled lives: Human-animal-plant histories of the Eastern Himalaya. Cambridge University Press.
56.
PaiN. (2008). Climate change and national security: Preparing India for new conflct scenarios. Takshashila Institution.
57.
PanditM. (2017). Life in the Himalaya: An ecosystem at risk. Harvard University Press.
58.
PanditM. (2020). The Himalaya should be a nature reserve. Nature, 583(7814), 1–4.
59.
PillaiA. (2021). Abiding by nature, not national borders: Institution building in Himalaya. World Bank.
60.
RaghavanS. (2019). The security dilemma and India–China relations. Asian Security, 15(1), 60–72.
61.
RanaP. (2014). China’s proposals for trans-Himalayan connectivity: Consider four economic corridors. RSIS Commentary, 154, 1–3.
62.
RangarajanM., & SivaramakrishnanK. (2014). Shifting ground: People, animal and mobility in India’s environmental history. Oxford University Press.
63.
RaniS., KumarR., & MaharanaP. (2022). Climate change, its impacts and sustainability issues in the Indian Himalaya: An introduction in climate change. Springer.
64.
RotheD., MullerF., & ChandlerD. (2021). Introduction. In ChandlerD., MullerF., & RotheD. (Eds.), International relations in the anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
SAARC. (1997). SAARC environment action plan. Third meeting of the SAARC environment ministers (pp. 1–4). South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.
66.
SAARC. (2020a, July12). About SAARC. https://www.saarc-sec.org/index.php/about-saarc/about-saarc
67.
SAARC. (2020b, July16). Environment natural disasters and biotechnology. https://www.saarc-sec.org/index.php/areas-of-cooperation/environment-natural-disasters-biotechnology
SabherwalA. (2015). The environment and military conflict: A critical review of the environmental security discourse in the Indian Himalaya. EnviroSociety.
SadanM. (2013). Being and becoming Kachin: Histories beyond the state in the borderlands of Burma. Oxford University Press.
72.
SaikiaA. (2011). Forests and ecological history of Assam, 1826–2000. Oxford University Press.
73.
SharmaC. M., BaduniN. P., GairolaS., GhildiyalS. K., & SuyalS. (2010). Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(12), 2170–2179.
74.
SteffenW., RichardsonK., RockströmJ., CornellS. E., FetzerI., BennettE. M., BiggsR., CarpenterS. R., de VriesW., de WitC. A., FolkeC., GertenD., HeinkeJ., MaceG. M., PerssonL. M., RamanathanV., ReyersB., & SörlinS. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
75.
TakahashiW. (2001). Environmental cooperation in Asia. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
76.
TarannumK., & KhanS. (2023). A study of SAARC: Objectives, challenges and prospects for regional cooperation. South Asia Journal of Social Sciences, 30(5), 115–125.
77.
TellisA. (2020). Hustling in the Himalaya: The Sino-Indian border confrontation. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
78.
The Hindu. (2025, April9). A regional revival: On the BIMSTEC summit. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/a-regional-revival-on-the-bimstec-summit/article69427340.ece
79.
ThompsonM., & GyawaliD. (2007). Introduction. In ThompsonM., WarburtonM., & HatleyT. (Eds.), Uncertainty on a Himalayan scale. Himal Books.
80.
TorA. (2017). Are doomsday scenarios best seen as failed predictions or political detonators? The case of the Theory of Himalayan Environmental Degradation. The Geographical Journal of Nepal, 10, 1–14.
81.
UNESCAP. (2010, June7). Paths to 2015: MDG priorities in Asia and the Pacific. https://unescap.org/resources/asia-pacific-mdg-report-201011-paths-2015-mdg-priorities-asia-and-pacific
82.
UpadhyayaA. (2014, June25). Modi’s TransHimalayan link to bring Nepal, India and China together. Indian Express.
83.
UpretiB. (2020, January). Starting at the top: Environmental security in the Himalaya. New Security Beat. https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2020/01/starting-top-environmental-security-himalayas/
84.
van MunsterR. (2021). The nuclear origins of the Anthropocene. In ChandlerD., MullerF., & RotheD. (Eds.), International relations in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.
WeerakoonE. (2023, July3). Indian ocean region and role of SAARC. India Foundation. https://indiafoundation.in/articles-and-commentaries/indian-ocean-region-and-role-of-saarc/
87.
WesterP., MishraA., MukherjiA., & ShreshthaA. (2019). The Hindu Kush Himalayan assessment. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.
88.
YashwantS. (2023, August17). Science not greed should decide the fate of Himalayas. Deccan Herald. https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/science-not-greed-should-decide-fate-of-himalayas-2650825
89.
ZouS. (2021). Riverine bazaars, trade and chiefs in colonial Lushai Hills. Asian Ethnicity, 22(1), 563–583.
