The present tensions in Belgrade–Pristina relations highlight the relevance of a consensus regarding the question of Kosovo. This article argues that the cyclical nature of Kosovo’s history has been muted by the thesis ‘Kosovo is a unique case’ which through unilateral decisions produced various legal schizophrenias. These legal schizophrenias embodied in a power triangle—Ahtisaari Plan–European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX)–Kosovo’s Constitution. Despite gaps and inherited chaos, the indisputable achievements of the EU’s efforts in normalizing relations between Belgrade and Pristina show that the EU not only can facilitate peace but also possesses the capacity to achieve a consensus. Already there is a ‘silent’ consensus among actors on the status of Kosovo—the European protectorate. The article also discusses institutional design based on the consensus, which aims to promote shared narratives.
Agreed Conclusions. (2011, December 2). http://www.helsinki.org.rs/doc/all%20agreed%20conclusions%20%282011-2012%29.pdf
2.
Agreed Conclusions. (2012, February 24). http://www.helsinki.org.rs/doc/all%20agreed%20conclusions%20%282011-2012%29.pdf
3.
AhtisaariM. (2007, February 2). The comprehensive proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement.
4.
BBC. (2017a, January 18). Train row almost pulls Kosovo and Serbia off the rails. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38666279
5.
BBC. (2017b, January 5). Former Kosovo PM Haradinaj arrested on war crimes warrant. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38510579
6.
Blic. (2008, December 25). Euleks počeo da sprovodi plan Martija Ahtisarija. https://www.blic.rs/vesti/politika/euleks-poceo-da-sprovodi-plan-martija-ahtisarija/2c2l6fs
7.
BrubakerR. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.
8.
BuremaL. (2012). Reconciliation in Kosovo? A few steps taken, a long road ahead. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 11(4), 7–27.
9.
ChandraK.WilkinsonS. (2008). Measuring the effect of ‘ethnicity’. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 515–563.
10.
Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo. (2008, April 7).
11.
Contact Group. (2005, November 2). Guiding principles of the Contact Group for a settlement of the status of Kosovo. Contact Group.
12.
CooperR. (2015). The Philosophy of the Belgrade–Pristina Dialogue. EuropeanWesternBalkans, http://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2015/07/16/sir-robert-cooper-the-philosophy-of-the-belgrade-pristina-dialogue/
13.
DahrendorfR. (1967). Society and Democracy in Germany. Doubleday & Company, Inc.
14.
Declaration of Independence for Kosovo. (2008, February 17).
15.
DoliF.KorenicaD. (2011). What about Kosovo’s Constitution. The Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 5(1), 49–70.
16.
EllerJ.CoughlanR. (1993). The poverty of primordialism: The demystification of ethnic attachments. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(2), 183–202.
17.
ElsterJ.OffeC.PreussU. K. (1998). Institutional design in post-communist societies: Rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge University Press.
18.
DačićI.ThaciH. (2013). First agreement of principles governing the normalisation of relations. http://www.kryeministri-ks.net/repository/docs/FIRST_AGREEMENT_OF_PRINCIPLES_GOVERNING_THE_NORMALIZATION_OF_RELATIONS,_APRIL_19,_2013_BRUSSELS_en.pdf.
19.
GashiS. (2012). Kosova 1912–2000: In the history textbooks of Kosova, Albania and Serbia. KAHCR and KEC, Printing Press.
20.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
21.
GlennyM. (2007). The Balkans: The status of Kosovo was supposed to be the last obstacle to solving the problems of the Balkans. New Statesman. http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2007/12/serbia-kosovo-russia-balkans
22.
HorowitzD. (1999, December 9–11). Constitutional design: Proposals versus process. Prepared for Delivery at the Kellogg Institute Conference, Constitutional Design 2000: Institutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Notre Dame. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246467.003.0002
23.
JudahT. (2008). Kosovo: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
24.
JovanovićM. (2011). Is Kosovo and Metohija indeed a “Unique Case”'. In SummersJ. (ed.) Kosovo: A precedent? The declaration of independence, the advisory opinion and implication for statehood, self-determination and minority rights (pp. 1–34). Martinus Nijhoff. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2318379
25.
LijphartA. (2008). Thinking about democracy: Power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. Routledge.
26.
LijphartA. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225.
27.
LijphartA. (1982). Consociation: The model and its applications in divided societies. In ReaD. (Ed.), Political co-operation in divided societies: A series of papers relevant to the conflict in Northern Ireland (pp. 166–186). Gill and Macmillan.
28.
LipmanP. (2006). No child left behind: Globalization, privatization and the politics inequality. In RossE. W.GibsonR. (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Education Reform (pp. 35–58). Hampton Press.
29.
LustickI. (2001). Agent-based modeling and constructivist identity theory. APSACP: Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association, 12(1), 22–25.
30.
MalcolmN. (1998). Kosovo: A short history. Macmilan.
31.
MarkoJ. (2008). The New Kosovo Constitution in a regional comparative perspective. Review of Central and East European Law, 33, 437–450.
32.
MillJ. S. (1972). Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government. J.M.Dent.
33.
MuharremiR. (2010). The EULEX from perspective of Kosovo Constitutional Law. ZaoRV, 70, 358–379.
34.
NovostiV. (2008, March 20). Pretnje ruše krhki mir. http://www.svevesti.com/a51468-pretnje-ru%C5%A1e-krhki-mir-u-kosovskoj-mitrovici
35.
O’NeillW. (2002). Kosovo: An unfinished peace. Lynne Reinner.
36.
PetersenR. (2012). Western intervention in the Balkans: The strategic use of emotions in conflict. Cambridge University Press.
37.
ReillyB. (2001). Democracy in divided societies: Electoral engineering for conflict management. Cambridge University Press.
38.
SimonsenS. G. (2005). Addressing ethnic division in post-conflict institution-building: Lesson from recent cases. Security Dialogue, 36(3), 297–318.
39.
StrapacovaM. (2016). The reconciliation process in Kosovo: Under the shadow of ethnic primordialist manipulation. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 18(2), 56–76.
40.
The 1974 Constitution. (1974). The constitution of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia.
41.
The Economist. (2006). History lessons: A joint history book that crosses Rhine. http://www.economist.com/node/7141381
42.
UN Security Council. (2006, October 7). Letter dated 7 October 2005 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council(UN Security Council Document S/2005/635). UN Security Council.
43.
UN Security Council. (2003, December 10). Standards for Kosovo. UN Security Council Report.
44.
UN Security Council. (1999, June 10). Resolution 1244. UN Security Council.
45.
UN Security Council. (2007, March 26). Report of the Special envoy of the secretary-general on Kosovo’s future status. (UN Security Council Document No. S/2007/168). UN Security Council.
46.
UN Security Council. (2008, June 12). Report of Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. UN Security Council.
47.
UN Security Council. (2005, October 24). Meeting of the Security Council(UN Security Council Document, S/PV5290). UN Security Council.
48.
UNMIK. (2001, May 15). Constitutional framework for provisional self-government(UNMIK/REG/2001/9). UNMIK.
49.
VickersM. (1998). Between Serb and Albanian: A history of Kosovo. Columbia University Press.
50.
VisokaG.DoyleJ. (2015). Neo-functional peace: The European union way of resolving conflicts. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 862–877.
51.
WalzerM. (1982). Pluralism in Political Perspective. In WalzerM. (Ed.), The Politics of Ethnicity (pp. 1–28), Harvard University Press.
