In the changing sphere of world politics, or more specifically in a multi-polar world, there has been a process of re-territorialization of the theory and practice of diplomacy. The discipline attempts to move away from the dominant Western influences and revive the non-Western understanding. The reading of Kautilya’s Arthashastra and Sun Tzu’s The Art of War in this context seems relevant, as these two ancient texts reinforce this understanding in an extensive manner.
This article in its first part deals with the aspect of the diplomatic theory of international relations (IR) and traces its shift. The second part deals with the non-Western understanding of the diplomatic theory. Since this viewpoint is read with respect to the two ancient texts, the third part attempts to give justification of how the historical texts can be approached at without committing the fallacy attached to the study of old historical texts. The fourth and fifth parts of the article deal extensively with the diplomacy enunciated in the texts of Kautilya and Sun Tzu, respectively. The relevance of these two texts in the contemporary period is also evaluated. Thus, the study of the texts further reinforces the view of the presence of alternative understanding to the dominant Eurocentric perspective.
AcharyaA. (2011). Dialogue and discovery: In search of international relations theories beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 619–637.
2.
AcharyaA. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and the regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 647–659.
3.
BhattacharyaP. (2014). Chanakya: An empiricist as a philosopher. Strategic Analysis, 38(5), 734–740.
4.
BilginP. (2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR?Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23.
5.
BjolaC. (2013). Understanding enmity and friendship in world politics: The case for a diplomatic approach. Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8, 1–20.
6.
BoescheR. (2003). Kautilya’s ‘Arthasashtra’ on war and diplomacy in ancient India. Journal of Military History, 67(1), 9–37.
7.
BoormanS. A.BoormanH. L. (1964). Mao Tse-Tung and The Art of War. Journal of Asian Studies, 24(1), 129–137.
8.
CraigG. A. (1979). On the nature of diplomatic history: The relevance of some old books. In LaurenP. G. (Ed.), Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory and policy. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
9.
CriekemansD. (2011). Exploring the relationship between geopolitics, foreign policy and diplomacy. International Studies Review, 13(4), 713–716.
10.
DeshingkarG. (1996). Strategic thinking in ancient India and China: Kautilya and Sunzi.China Report, 32(1), 1–13.
11.
EbanA. (1983). The new diplomacy: International affairs in the modern age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
12.
JohnstonA. I. (1995). China’s new ‘old thinking’: The concept of limited deterrence. International Security, 20(3), 5–42.
13.
JonssonC.HallM. (2005). Essence of diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Publication.
14.
KangleR. P. (1965). Kautilya Arthasastra, Part III, A Study. Bombay: University of Bombay Fort.
15.
KissingerH. (2011). On China. New York: Penguin Books, Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
LiebigM. (2013). Kautilya’s relevance for India today. India Quarterly, 69(2), 99–116.
18.
LoP. C. (2012). Warfare ethics in Sunzi’ Art of War? Historical controversies and contemporary perspectives. Journal of Military Ethics, 11(2), 114–135.
MallavarapuS. (2009). Development of International Relations Theory in India: Traditions, Contemporary Perspectives and Trajectories. International Studies, 46(1–2), 165–183.
21.
MehtaP. B. (2009). Foreword. In AlagappaM. (Ed.). Report of the Workshop on International Studies in India. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.
22.
MenonS. (2013). On strategic studies and international relations studies in India. Proceedings from 3rd International Studies Convention2015, JNU Convention Centre, New Delhi.
23.
ModelskiG. (1964). Kautilya: Foreign policy and the international system in the ancient Hindu world. American Political Science Review, 58(3), 549–560.
24.
NathanA. J. (2011). What China wants: Bargaining with Beijing. Foreign Affairs, 90(4), 153–158.
25.
NiouE. M. S.OrdeshookP. C. (1994). A game-theoretic interpretation of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. Journal of Peace Research, 31(2), 161–174.
26.
PetrM. S. D. (2013). Non Western reflection of politics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang A G.
27.
PouliotV.CornutJ. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 297–315.
28.
PuchalaD. J. (1997). Some non-Western perspectives on international relations. Journal of Peace Research, 34(2), 129–134.
29.
RamachandranK. N. (2014). Sun Zi and Kautilya: Towards a comparative analysis. Strategic Analysis, 38(3), 390–408. First published in IDSA Occasional Paper in 1999.
30.
RangarajanL. N. (1992). Kautilya: The Arthashastra (English translation of the Arthashastra). New Delhi: Penguin Books.
31.
RickardJ. (2008). Sun Tzu, nuclear weapons and China’s grand strategy. California: Centre for Contemporary Conflict.
32.
SastryK. K. R. (1954). A note on Udasina—Neutrality in ancient India. In AlexandrowiczC. H. (Ed.), The Indian year book of international affairs (Vol. 3, pp. 131–134).
33.
ShahiD. (2013). Indian scholarship on international relations and multilateralism. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(5), 50–58.
34.
ShahiD. (2014). Arthashastra beyond realpolitik: The ‘eclectic’ face of Kautilya. Economic & Political Weekly, XLIX(41), 68–74.
35.
ShamasastryR. (1929). Arthashastra of Kautilya. University of Mysore: Oriental Library Publications.
36.
SharpP. (2009). Diplomatic theory of international relations. New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SharpP. (2011). Diplomats, diplomacy, diplomatic studies and the future of international relations and international studies. International Studies Review, 13(4), 716–719.
38.
SinghM. P. (2011). Kautilya: Theory of state. In SinghM. P. Himanshu (Eds), Indian political thought: Themes and thinkers (pp. 1–17). Delhi: Pearson Education.
39.
SkinnerQ. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.
40.
TrachtenbergM. (2006). The craft of international history: A guide to method. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
41.
TzuS. (1963). Sun Tzu: The Art of War (S. B. Griffith, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
42.
TzuS. (2009). Sun Tzu: The Art of War (L. Giles, Trans.). New Delhi: Pentagon Press.
43.
WarnerM. (2006). The divine skein: Sun Tzu on intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 21(4), 483–492.
44.
YuenD. M. C. (2008). Deciphering Sun Tzu. Comparative Strategy, 27(2), 183–200.
