Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

There has largely been a consensus among comparative political scientists regarding the relevance of a participatory and transparent democratic constitution-making process in democratic transition and consolidation. However, there are fewer attempts to see any linkage between postcolonial India and post-Soviet processes of democracy-building. Questions related to the differences or similarities between the two contexts have not received much attention, especially from the scholars of the Global South. This article attempts to explain such interlinkages between the Russian and Indian case. Though the process of democracy-building started much earlier in the case of India, certain parallels or complexities can be identified through a comparative analysis of the two cases. The study draws on secondary literature to substantiate the arguments. It attempts to argue that in case of India, the idea of constitution-making was largely driven by the logic of an alternative collective rationality through deliberation and accommodation, whereas in case of Russia it was a symbol of implementing the already dominant socio-economic model without following a process of deliberations among various sociopolitical groups.

Keywords

Russia India deliberative democracy democratization constitution-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

Granville

(1966). The Indian constitution: Cornerstone of a nation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Bhargava

Rajiv

(2008). Politics and ethics of the Indian constitution. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Bunce

Valerie

(2003). Rethinking recent democratization: Lessons from the postcommunist experience. World Politics, 55, 167–192.

Cohen

Joshua

(2009). Deliberations and democratic legitimacy. Retrieved 20 December 2009, from http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rarneson/JCOHENDELIBERATIVE%20DEM.pdf

Colton

Timothy

(1998). Public opinion and the constitutional referendum. In Colton

Timothy

Hough

Jerry

(Eds), Growing pains: Russian democracy and the elections of 1993. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Elster

Jon

(1998). Deliberation and constitution making. In Elster

Jon

(Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 97–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fearon

James D.

(1998). Deliberation as discussion. In Elster

Jon

(Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 44–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fish

M. Steven

(2005). Democracy derailed in Russia: Failure of open politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Habermas

Jurgen

(1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

10.

Isakova

Irina

(2005). Russian governance in the twenty first century. Abingdon: Frank Cass.

11.

McFaul

Michael

(2001). Russia’s unfinished revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

12.

McFaul

Michael

Petrov

Nikolai

(2004). What elections tell us. Journal of Democracy, 15(3), 20–31.

13.

Moser

Robert G.

(1998). The electoral effects of presidentialism in post-soviet Russia. In Lőwenhardt

John

(Ed.), Party politics in post-communist Russia. London: Frank Cass.

14.

Rawls

John

(1971). A theory of justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

15.

Robinson

Neil

(2004). Path dependency, global economy and post-communist change. In Robinson

Neil

(Ed.), Reforging the weakest link: global political economy and postSoviet change in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. London: Ashgate.

16.

Said

Edward

(1978). Orientalism. New Delhi: Penguin.

17.

Spivak

Gayatri C.

(1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313).

18.

Spivak

Gayatri C.

Guha

Ranajit

(1988). Selected subaltern studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Sunstein

Cass R.

(2001). Designing democracy: What constitutions do. New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Troxel

Tiffany A.

(2003). Parliamentary power in Russia, 1994–2001: President vs parliament. Hampshire: Palgrave Press.

21.

Urban

Michael

(1994). December 1993 as a replication of late-soviet electoral practices. Post-Soviet Affairs, 10(2), 127–158.

22.

White

Stephen

(2006). Russians and their party system. Democratizatsiya, 14(1), 7–22.

Postcolonial and Post-Soviet Experiences of Constitution-making

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References