The postcolonial political order in South Asia marked the diffusion of a sense of territoriality and with it the consolidation of a new geographical order. Borders marking the limits of territory—sometimes arbitrarily drawn or carved out—defined the landscape of states and became rigid markers of the identity of nations. Along with challenges to the legitimizing narratives of national identity and nation making, the absolutist notion of territoriality also underwent changes in postcolonial state construction. The constructed geography of the state has been challenged by indigenous communities which, by negotiating borders, constantly deconstruct them. The fishing community along the coasts of Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka exhibit the process of negotiating such postcolonial spaces by straying across designated borders. The history of Kachchativu reveals the complexity created by close, undefined borders: interstate connectedness and disjuncture between members of a community that share history and resources across the border.
CooperA.PerkinsC. (2012). Borders and status-functions: An institutional approach to the study of borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 55–77.
5.
CorbettG.L. (1924, August7). Note by GL Corbett “Question of ownership of the Island of Kachitivu” File no: 327-G/29. Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, National Archives of India.
6.
DayalH. (1953). Letter to the Chief Secretary and Cabinet Secretary dated 4 November 1953. File number 26/14/56-J II, Legislation to replace the United Kingdom Territorial Waters jurisdiction Act, 1878, in its application to India, Ministry of Defence-D Navy, The Territorial Waters (Criminal Jurisdiction Bill), 1954,National Archives of India.
7.
De SilvaS. (2008). Sharing maritime boundary with India: Sri Lankan experience. Paper presented at the Working Group meeting of the Regional Network for Strategic Studies Centres (RNSCC) organized by the National Defense University, Washington, DC on ‘WMD and Border Security Issues’, held during12–15October2008 in Istanbul, Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.kdu.ac.lk/department-of-strategic-studies/images/publications/Sharing_Maritime_BoundarywithIndia-NESA.pdf
8.
DunlopR.W.L. (1925). Official dispatch dated 12 February 1935: 3–7. File number 49-S, Territorial Waters–What are? Ceylon–Agreement with Territorial Waters, 1925, Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, Government of India, National Archives of India.
9.
FawazL.T.BaylyC.A. (Eds). (2002). Modernity and culture: From the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
Foreign and Political Department (1929). File number 327-G/29, Proposed Delimitation of the Gulf of Manaar and Palk Strait with a view to safeguard the marine fisheries off the Madras Coast, Question of ownership of the island of Kachitivu, 1929. Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, Government of India, National Archives of India.
11.
FraserW.K.Tytler. (1922). Report of the information reproduced from the Imperial Records Department. File number 327-G/29, Proposed Delimitation of the Gulf of Manaar and Palk Strait with a View to Safeguard the Marine Fisheries off the Madras Coast, Question of Ownership of the Island of Kachitivu, 1929, Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, Government of India, National Archives of India.
12.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1992). Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23.
13.
GuptaC., ( 2007). Bonded Bodies: Coastal Fisherfolk, Everyday Migrations and National Anxieties in India and Sri Lanka. Cultural Dynamics, 19(2/3), 237–255.
14.
GuptaC.SharmaM. (2004). Blurred borders: Coastal conflicts between India and Pakistan. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(27), 3005–3015.
15.
GuptaC.SharmaM. (2008). Contested coastlines: Fisherfolk, nations and borders in South Asia. New Delhi: Routledge.
16.
HindG.OglivieI.G. (1938). Control of fishing activities of foreign vessels. Extract from notes in Commerce Department file number F.226.M II (C.O)/37 (Defence Department). File number 389 (2)- I.B,/38, Jurisdiction of Maritime States over their Territorial Waters, Political Department, IB Branch, 1938, National Archives of India.
17.
KlienN. (2004). Dispute settlement in the UN convention on the law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KrishnaS. (1999). Postcolonial insecurities: India, Sri Lanka and the question of nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
LewisM.W.WigenK. (1999). A maritime response to the crises in area studies. The Geographical Review, 89(2), 161–168.
20.
Lok Sabha Debates. (2007). Regarding reported attacks by Sri Lankan Navy on Indian fishermen. 13March2007. Speech by Shrimati M.S.K. Bhavani Rajenthiran (Ramanathapuram). Retrieved from http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1542028/
21.
MaitreyanV. (2013). Responsibility for attack on Indian fishermen, March21, 2013, Rajya Sabha question number 2669. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
McCowieH., (1923). Copy of a note by Lieutenant Colonel H. McCowie, RE Superintendent of the trignometrical survey, Dehra Dun, 3January, 1923. File number 327-G/29, Proposed Delimitation of the Gulf of Manaar and Palk Strait with a View to Safeguard the Marine Fisheries off the Madras Coast, Question of Ownership of the Island of Kachitivu, 1929, Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, Government of India, National Archives of India.
24.
McPhersonK. (2002). Port cities as nodal points of change: The Indian Ocean, 1890s–1920s. In FawazL.T.BaylyC.A. (Eds.), Modernity and culture: From the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean (pp. 75–95). New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Ministry of Law (1954a). Report by the Ministry of Law, 1954. File number 26/14/56-J II, Legislation to replace the United Kingdom Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878, in its application to India, Ministry of Defence-D Navy, The Territorial Waters (Criminal Jurisdiction Bill), 1954, National Archives of India.
26.
Ministry of Law. (1954b). Draft, Territorial Waters (Criminal Jurisdiction) Bill, 1954, Appendix, file number 26/14/56-J II, National Archives of India.
27.
MoraczewskaA. (2010). The changing interpretation of border functions in international relations. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, 12(2), 329–340.
28.
MuniS.D. (1974). Kachchativu settlement: Befriending neighbouring regimes. Economic and Political Weekly, 9(28), 1119–1122.
29.
MurdeshwarB.G. (1953). Official dispatch by the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law, 12October1953. File number 26/14/56-J II, Legislation to replace the United Kingdom Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878, in its application to India, Ministry of Defence-D Navy, The Territorial Waters (Criminal Jurisdiction Bill), 1954, National Archives of India.
30.
MurdeshwarB.G. (1954). Letter to Ministry of Home Affairs, 4March1954. File number 26/14/56-J II, Legislation to replace the United Kingdom Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act, 1878, in its application to India, Ministry of Defence-D Navy, The Territorial Waters (Criminal Jurisdiction Bill), 1954, National Archives of India.
31.
NewmanD. (2006). Borders and bordering: Towards an interdisciplinary dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171–186.
32.
NooraniA.G. (2014). Boundary disputes and Supreme Court. Frontline, 31(11), 112–119.
33.
PandianM.S.S. (2009). Perilous trans-border journeys, contested coastlines: fisherfolk, nations and borders in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(39), 27–28.
34.
PeterA. (2003). Redrawing the line: Borders and security in the twenty first century. International Security, 28(2), 78–111.
35.
PillaiN.R. (1938). Commerce Department, 3November1938. File number 389 (2)- I.B,/38, Jurisdiction of Maritime States over their Territorial Waters, Political Department, IB Branch, 1938, National Archives of India.
36.
PuriA.N.(1938). External affairs department, 29December1938. File number 389 (2)- I.B,/38, Jurisdiction of Maritime States over their Territorial Waters, Political Department, IB Branch, 1938, National Archives of India.
37.
RajaD. (2011). Resumption of Tuticorin–Colombo ferry service, 11August2011, Rajya Sabha, unstarred question number 1297. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
38.
RajaD. (2013). Attack and detention of Indian Fishermen, 22August2013, Rajya Sabha, question number 1439. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
39.
RajuS.A.KeethaponchalanS.I. (2006). Maritime cooperation between India and Sri Lanka. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers.
SelvaganapathiT.M. (2013a). Meeting between representative of fishermen, 5December2013, Rajya Sabha, question number 59. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
42.
SelvaganapathiT.M. (2013b). Fishermen arrested by Sri Lanka, 5December2013, Rajya Sabha, question number 4. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
43.
SinghN.K. (2011). Fishermen in jails of Sri Lanka, 10March2011, Rajya Sabha, question number 1593. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs.
44.
SmithA.D. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and nationalism: A cultural approach. London: Routledge.
45.
SuryanarayananV. (1994). Kachchativu and the problems of Indian fishermen in the Palk Bay region. Madras: T.R. Publication.
46.
SuryanarayananV. (2005). Conflict over Fisheries in the Palk Bay Region. New Delhi: Lancer Publishers
47.
SuryanarayananV. (2013, 27March). Special address, Regional Conference on Engaging South Asia: Challenges and Opportunities of New Diplomacy, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam.
48.
TaylorJ.B. (1922). Letter to the Secretary to the Government of Madras, Finance (Marine) Department, number 1739, dated 29 March 1922. File number 327-G/29, Proposed Delimitation of the Gulf of Manaar and Palk Strait with a View to Safeguard the Marine Fisheries off the Madras Coast, Question of Ownership of the Island of Kachitivu, 1929, Foreign and Political Department, General Branch, Government of India, National Archives of India.
ThambiduraiM. (2013b). Regarding reported capturing of Tamil fishermen by Sri Lankan Navy, 14March2013, Lok Sabha Debates. Retrieved from http://indiankanoon.org/doc/129145471/
51.
VivekanandanV. (2003). Crossing maritime borders: The problem and solution in the Indo-Sri Lankan context. In KumarK.G. (Ed.), Forging unity: Coastal communities and the Indian Ocean’s future. Proceedings of the Indian Ocean Conference held at IIT Madras, Chennai, India, 9–13October2001 (pp. 76–89). Chennai: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF). Retrieved from http://aquaticcommons.org/278/1/IOC_proceedings.pdf
