A perspective from border studies imagines an emerging global order based on how an increasing number, extent and intensity of borders, bordering practice and borderlands interact with the forces of globalization. The result of this interaction is an evolving, richly textured and complex layering of global transition in which several processes are apparent with spatial signatures. These are related to and explained by new conceptualizations of borders and an emerging theory of borders in motion. Foremost among the conceptualizations is the notion of shifting: borders and borderlands are not necessarily where they appear to be or where they once were. Another is positioning: imposition and superimposition that creates constantly changing border spaces, bordering practices and border places. Finally, packing develops intensities of border function and articulates variable border production. These conceptualizations of borders in motion offer a new credence and framework of inherited and enhanced territorial differentiation and compilation, which elevates the discourse beyond cardinality, colonialism and continentality, interrogates these ingrained notions, and suggests that the world is indeed evolved and evolving (b)ordered space.
AgnewJ. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.
3.
AgnewJ. (2008). Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics and Global Politics, 1(4), 175–191.
4.
AgnewJ. (2010). Still trapped in territory?Geopolitics, 15(4), 779–784.
5.
AlligoodK.T.SauerT.D.YorkeJ.A. (1997). Chaos: Introduction to dynamical systems. New York: Springer.
6.
AlperD. (2011). Border security in the borderlands: Regional governance as the foundation of effective border management. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
7.
Alvarez PerezM.BergerM.T. (2009). Bordering on the ridiculous: MexAmerica and the new regionalism. Alternatives, 34(1), 1–16.
8.
Amilhat SzaryA.L.FrédéricG. (2015). Borderities and the politics of contemporary mobile borders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
AndersenD. (2011). Borderwork in a European No-Man’s-Land: Everyday reflections on the effects of European integration on border practice and identity discourse at the Slovenian/Croatian Border on Istria. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
10.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
ArnoldV.I. (1992). Catastrophe theory (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
12.
BalibarÉ. (2002). Politics and the other scene. London: Verso.
13.
BalibarÉ. (2004). We, the people of Europe: Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
BaudM.Van SchendelW. (1997). Toward a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History, 8(2), 211–242.
15.
BauderH. (2011). Toward a critical geography of the border: Engaging the dialectic of practice and meaning. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 101(5), 1126–1139.
16.
BhabhaH.K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
17.
BlakeleyR. (2009). State terrorism and neoliberalism: The North in the South. New York: Routledge.
18.
BorgS. (2014). Euro-crafting at border zones: The case of the Greco-Turkish border and the question of a European Union ‘beyond the state’. Geopolitics, 19(3), 565–586.
19.
Brunet-JaillyE. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, 10(4), 633–649.
20.
Brunet-JaillyE. (2011). In an era of security is the territoriality of borders challenged?Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
21.
CartwrightD.E. (1999). Tides: A scientific history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
CastellsM. (1996). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Volume 1: the rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
ChevalierG. (2011). Mesures de sécurité renforcées à Stanstead au Québec et Derby Line au Vermont, Exposition sur Stanstead [Enhanced security measures in Stanstead in Quebec and Derby Line, Vermont, Stanstead Exhibition]. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
24.
ChomskyN. (1996). World orders, old and new. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
CoxF.R. (1992). Range in soil phosphorus critical levels with time. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(5), 1504–1509.
26.
CulcasiK. (2011). Cartographies of supranationalism: Creating and silencing territories in the ‘Arab Homeland’. Political Geography, 30(8), 417–428.
27.
Cyprus Tourist Organization. (2011). A visitor’s map of Cyprus. Nicosia: Cyprus Tourist Organization.
28.
DaviesN. (2011). Vanished kingdoms: The history of half-forgotten Europe. London: Allen Lane.
29.
DearM. (2013). Why walls won’t work: Repairing the US-Mexico divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
DienerA.C.HagenJ. (2009). Theorizing borders in a ‘borderless world’: Globalization, territory and identity. Geography Compass, 3(3), 1196–1216.
31.
DreznerD.W. (2007). The new new world order. Foreign Affairs, 86(2), March–April, 1–9.
32.
EldenS. (2013). Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography, 32(2), 35–51.
33.
EskelinenH.LiikanenI.ScottJ.W. (Eds). (2013). The EU-Russia borderland: New contexts for regional cooperation. New York: Routledge.
34.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon.
35.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon.
36.
GeigerM.PécoudA. (Eds). (2013). Disciplining the transnational mobility of people. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
GillS.CutlerA.C. (Eds). (2014). New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
GladwellM. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
39.
GreeneB. (1999). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: Vintage.
40.
HamezG.de RuffrayS. (2011). Enjeux theoretiques et methodologiques d’une comparison des regions transfrontalieres [Theoretical and methodological issues in a comparison of border regions]. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
41.
HegelG.W.F. ([1807] 2005). Phanomenologie des Geistes [Phenomenology of spirit]. Paderborn: Voltmedia.
42.
HeinJ. R.EvansJ.JonesP. (2008). Mobile methodologies: Theory, technology and practice. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1266–1285.
KhamaisiR. (2008). From imposed ceasefire line to international border: The issue of the Green Line between Palestine and Israel. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 23(1), 85–102.
45.
KissingerH. (2014). World order. New York: Penguin.
KonradV. (2010). Breaking points but no ‘broken border’: Stakeholders evaluate border issues in the Pacific Northwest region. Research Report 10, Border Policy Research Institute, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington.
48.
KonradV. (2015). Toward a theory of borders in motion. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(1), 1–17.
49.
KonradV.NicolH.N. (2008). Beyond walls: Re-inventing the Canada-United States borderlands. Aldershot: Ashgate.
50.
KonradV.NicolH.N. (2011). Border culture, the boundary between Canada and the United States of America, and the advancement of borderlands theory. Geopolitics, 16(1), 70–90.
51.
KramschO. T. (2006a). Postcolonial shadow plays in the Dutch/German borderlands. In Engel-Di MauroSalvatore (Ed), The European’s burden: Global imperialism in EU expansion (pp.28–51). New York: Peter Lang.
52.
KramschO. T. (2006b). Transboundary governmentality on Europe’s postcolonial edge: The Cypriot Green Line. Journal of Comparative European Politics, 4(2), 289–307.
53.
LaineJ. (2013). New civic neighborhood: Cross-border cooperation and civil society engagement at the Finnish-Russian border. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
54.
LefebvreH. (2001). Comment on a new state form. Antipode, 35(5), 769–782.
55.
LipsetS.M. (1997). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: Norton.
56.
MacleodG.JonesM. (2007). Territorial, Scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a ‘regional world’?Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177–1191.
57.
MadsenK.D. (2011). Barriers of the US-Mexico border as landscapes of domestic political compromise. Cultural Geographies, 18(4), 547–566.
58.
MartínezO.J. (1994). Border people: Life and society in the US-Mexico borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
59.
MayerE.P. (2014). Narrating North American borderlands: Thomas King, Howard F. Mosher and Jim Lynch [Mainzer Studienzur Amerikanistik Band 64]. New York: Peter Lang.
60.
MbembeA. (2001). On the postcolony. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
61.
MedeirosE. (2011). Euro-Meso-Macro: The new regions in Iberian and European space. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
62.
MoisioS.PaasiA. (2013). Beyond state-centricity: Geopolitics of changing state spaces. Geopolitics, 18(2), 255–266.
63.
MorehouseB.J. (2004). Theoretical approaches to border space and identities. In VeraPavlakovich-KochiMorehouseBarbara J.DorisWastl-Walter (Eds), Challenged borderlands: Transcending political and cultural boundaries (pp.19–40). Aldershot: Ashgate.
64.
MostovJ. (2008). Soft borders: Rethinking sovereignty and democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
MostovJ. (2010). Rethinking borders, violence, and space, SSRN, 10 August. Retrieved12March2011, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1667415
66.
MurphyA.B. (2013). Territory’s continuing allure. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1212–1226.
67.
NewmanD. (1995). Boundaries in flux: The Green Line boundary between Israel and the West Bank-past, present and future. Durham: IBRU.
68.
NewmanD. (2003). On borders and power: A theoretical framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 13–25.
69.
NewmanD. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ worlds. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161.
70.
NewmanD.PaasiA. (1998). Fences and neighbors in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207.
71.
OhmaeK. (1995). The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economies. London: Harper Collins.
72.
OllapallyD. (1993). The south looks north: The third world and the new world order. Current History, 92(573), 175–179.
73.
ParkerN. (2009). From borders to margins: A Deluzian ontology for identities in the post-international environment. Alternatives, 34(1), 17–39.
74.
PayanT. (2011). Toward a function-based theory of borders. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
75.
PayanT. (2014). Ciudad Juarez: A perfect storm on the US-Mexico border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(4), 435–448.
76.
RafferK.SingerH.W. (2001). The economic North-South divide: Six decades of unequal development. London: Edward Elgar.
77.
ReddyM.P.M.AffholderM. (2002). Descriptive physical oceanography: State of the art. London: Taylor and Francis.
78.
RetailleD. (2005). L’espace mobile [The movable space]. In AntheaumeBenoitGirautFrédéric (Eds), Le territoire est mort, Vive les territories! Une (re)fabrication au nom du development [The territory is dead, Long live the territories! (Re)production in the name of development] (pp. 175–202). Paris: Institut de recherche pour le développement.
79.
RetailleD.WaltherO. (2011). Spaces of uncertainty: A model of mobile space in the Sahel. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 32(1), 85–101.
80.
RumfordC. (2013). Citizens and Borderwork in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge
81.
SahleE.N. (2010). World orders: Development and transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
SassenS (1988). The mobility of labor and capital: A study in international investment and labor flows. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
83.
SassenS. (1996). Beyond sovereignty: Immigration policy making today. Social Justice, 23(3), 9–19.
84.
SassenS. (2011). Bordering capabilities: Beyond national borders. Keynote presentation at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
85.
SellarC. (2014). Building a transnational fusion bureaucracy? A case study of state officials and opinion leaders in (Rousse) Bulgaria and Transcarpathia (Ukraine). Geopolitics, 19(3), 540–564.
86.
ShahN. (2012). The territorial trap of the territorial trap: Global transformation and the problems of the state’s two territories. International Political Sociology, 6(1), 1–20.
87.
ShellerM.UrryJ. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning, 38(2), 207–226.
88.
Reid-HenryS. (2010). The territorial trap fifteen years on. Geopolitics, 15(4), 752–756.
89.
SohnC. (2011). The border as a resource in the global urban space: Reflections on the cross-border metropolitan hypothesis. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
90.
SohnC.WaltherO. (2009). Metropolitanisation et integration transfrontaliere: le paradoxe luxembourgiouse [Metropolitanization and transfrontier integration: the Luxembourg paradox]. Espace et Societes, 138(3), 51–67.
91.
SohnC.WaltherO. (2011). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe. Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition Conference BRIT XI, Geneva and Grenoble, 6–9September.
92.
ThompsonW.R.ReuvenyR. (2009). Limits to globalization: North-South divergence. New York: Routledge.
93.
ValletÉ.DavidC.-P. (2012). Introduction: The (re)building of the wall in international relations. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(2), 111–120.
94.
Van HoutumH.KramschO.ZierhoferW. 2005. B/Ordering Space. Aldershot: Ashgate
