This article examines the emergence and transformation of Norway’s peace engagement in the context of changing international relations. Focusing on foreign policy discourses and practices, the article portrays peace engagement as a value-based effort to support resolution of distant intrastate conflicts, and a strategy to promote Norway’s interests and influence in international relations. The article also argues that changing international politics after the turn of the century has challenged and reoriented Norway’s peace engagement in a more realist direction. Foreign policy discourses and practices are increasingly based on a broad notion of interests that also include ideals of peace, democracy and development. This means that peace engagement can support a domestic political consensus on foreign policy, and simultaneously promote Norway’s standing, relevance and influence in international relations. Peace engagement has thus been institutionalized as a foreign policy that promotes peace while also addressing the challenges associated with smallness in international relations.
BaehrP. (1975). Small states: A tool for analysis?World Politics, 27(3), 456–466.
2.
BastianS. (2007). The politics of foreign aid in Sri Lanka: Promoting markets and supporting peace. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.
3.
CallahanM. (2012). The opening in Burma: The generals loosen their grip. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 120–131.
4.
CheesmanN.SkidmoreM.WilsonT. (Eds). (2010). Ruling Myanmar: From cyclone Nargis to national elections. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
5.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (2001). Greed and grievance in Civil War. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 2355. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
6.
CollierP.ElliottV.L.HegreH.HoefflerA.Reynal-QuerolM.SambanisN. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
7.
CurrieK. (2012). Burma in the balance: The role of foreign assistance in supporting Burma’s democratic transition. Arlington: Project 2049 Institute.
8.
de VottaN. (2004). Blowback: Linguistic nationalism, institutional decay, and ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9.
DiamondL. (2012). The opening in Burma: The need for a political pact. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 138–149.
10.
DittmerL. (Ed.). (2010). Burma or Myanmar? The struggle for national identity. Singapore: World Scientific.
11.
DuffieldM. (2007). Development, security and unending war governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
EgelandJ. (1988). Impotent superpower—Potent small state: Potentials and limitations of human rights objectives in the foreign policies of the United States and Norway. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
13.
EgreteauR.JaganL. (2013). Soldiers and diplomacy in Burma: Understanding the foreign relations of the Burmese Praetorian State. Singapore: NUS Press.
14.
FoxA.B. (1959). The power of small states: Diplomacy in World War II. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15.
GoodhandJ.KlemB.SørbøG. (2011). Pawns of peace: Evaluation of Norwegian peace efforts in Sri Lanka, 1997–2009. Oslo: Norad Evaluation Department, Report 5/2011.
16.
GrægerN. (2009). Idealer og interesser i nytt samspill [Ideals and interests in new interaction]. Internasjonal Politikk, 67(3), 518–520.
17.
GrægerN.LeiraH. (2005). Norwegian strategic culture after World War II: From a local to a global perspective. Co-operation and Conflict, 40(1), 45–67.
18.
HaackeJ. (2006). Myanmar’s foreign policy: Domestic influences and international implications. London: Routledge.
19.
HarpvikenK.B.SkjelsbrækI. (2010). Tilslørt fredspolitikk [Veiled peace engagement]. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 27(4), 379–388.
20.
HeierT. (2006). Influence and marginalisation: Norway’s adaptation to US transformation efforts in NATO, 1998–2004. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
21.
HolstJ.J. (1985). Lilliputs and Gulliver: Small states in a great-power alliance. In FlynnG. (Ed.), NATO’s northern allies: The national security policies of Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands & Norway (pp. 258–286). Totawa: Rowman & Allanheld.
22.
HöglundK.SvenssonI. (2011). Fallacies of the peace ownership approach: Exploring Norwegian mediation in Sri Lanka. In StokkeK.UyangodaJ. (Eds), Liberal peace in question: Politics of state and market reforms in Sri Lanka (pp. 63–75). London: Anthem.
23.
IngebritsenC. (2006). Scandinavia in world politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
IngebritsenC.NeumannI.GstöhlS.BeyerJ. (Eds). (2006). Small states in international relations. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
25.
JørgensenM.W.PhillipsL.J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
26.
KaldorM. (2006). New and old wars: Organised violence in a global era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
KeohaneR. (1969). Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.
28.
KjølbergA. (2007). Livet i hegemonens skygge: en småstats sikkerhetslogikk [Life in the hegemon’s shadow: a small state’s security logic]. Kjeller: Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt.
29.
KnutsenT.L.SørbøG.M.GjerdåkerS. (1995). Norges utenrikspolitikk [Norwegian foreign policy]. Oslo: Cappelen.
30.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
31.
LangeE.PharoH.ØsterudØ. (2009). Vendepunkter i norsk utenrikspolitikk: Nye internasjonale vilkår etter den kalde krigen [Turning points in Norwegian foreign policy: New international terms after the Cold War]. Oslo: Unipub.
32.
LeiraH. (2002). Internasjonal idealisme og Norge. Utenrikspolitisk tenkning fra Justus Lipsius til Halvdan Koht [International idealism and Norway. Foreign policy thinking from Justus Lipsius to Halvdan Koht]. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
33.
LeiraH. (Ed.). (2007). Norske selvbilder og norsk utenrikspolitikk [Norwegian self perceptions and Norwegian foreign policy]. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
34.
LilandF.KjerlandK.A. (2003). Norsk utviklingshjelps historie (bind 3). 1989–2002: På bred front [Norwegian development aid history (volume 3). 1989-2002]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
35.
LiyanageS. (2008). One Step at a Time: Reflections on the peace process in Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: South Asia Peace Institute.
36.
LundeL.ThuneH.FleischerE.GrünfeldL.SendingO.J. (2008). Norske interesser: Utenrikspolitikk for en globalisert verden [Norwegian interests. Foreign policy for a globalized world]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
37.
LunsteadJ. (2007). The United States’ role in Sri Lanka’s peace process 2002–2006. Colombo, Sri Lanka: The Asia Foundation.
38.
MatlaryJ.H. (2002). Verdidiplomati - kilde til makt? En strategisk analyse av norsk utenrikspolitikk [Value diplomacy – source of power? A strategic analysis of Norwegian foreign policy]. Oslo: Cappelen.
39.
MatlaryJ.H. (2009). Mange ord, lite nytt [Many words, little new]. Internasjonal politikk, 67(3), 529–531.
40.
MatlaryJ.H.ØsterudØ. (Eds). (2007). Denationalisation of defence: Convergence and diversity. London: Ashgate.
41.
MelissenJ. (2005). Wielding soft power: The new public diplomacy. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
42.
Ministry of Development Co-operation (1987). Report no. 34 to the Storting (1986–1987): Om hovedspørsmål i norsk utviklingshjelp [On key questions in Norwegian development aid]. Oslo: Ministry of Development Co-operation.
43.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1989). Report no. 11 to the Storting (1989–1990): Om utviklingstrekk i det internasjonale samfunn og virkninger for norsk utenrikspolitikk [On developments in international society and effects on Norwegian foreign policy]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
44.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1992). Report no. 51 to the Storting (1991–1992): Om utviklingstrekki Nord-Sør forholdet og Norges samarbeid med utviklingslandene [On developments in North-South relations and Norway’s cooperation with developing countries]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
45.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1995). Report no 19 to the Storting (1995–1996): En verdeni endring. Hovedtrekki norsk politikk overfor utviklingslandene [A changing world]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
46.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2004). Report no 35 to the Storting (2003–2004): Felles kamp mot fattigdom. En helhetlig utviklingspolitikk [Common fight against poverty. A holistic debelopment policy]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
47.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2009a). Report no 13 to the Storting (2008–2009): Klima, konflikt og kapital. Norsk utviklingspolitikk i et endret handlingsrom [Climate, conflict and capital]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
48.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2009b). Report no 15 to the Storting (2008–2009): Interesser, ansvar og muligheter. Hovedlinjer i norsk utenrikspolitikk [Interests, responsibilities and opprtunitites. Main lines in Norwegian foreign policy]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
49.
NadarajahS.SriskandarajahD. (2005). Liberation struggle or terrorism? The politics of naming the LTTE. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 87–100.
50.
NayakM.SelbinE. (2010). Decentring international relations. London: Zed.
51.
NeumannI.B.GstöhlS. (2006). Introduction. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? In IngebritsenC.NeumannI.GstöhlS.BeyerJ. (Eds), Small states in international relations (pp. 3–36). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
52.
NilsenM. (2013). Will democracy bring peace to Myanmar?International Area Studies Review, 16(2), 115–141.
53.
NyeJ.S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
54.
ØsterudØ. (2005). Introduction: The peculiarities of Norway. West European Politics, 28(4), 705–720.
55.
ØsterudØ. (2006). Small country as humanitarian superpower. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift [Small country as humanitarian superpower], 23(4), 303–316.
56.
ParisR. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RainfordC.SatkunanathanA. (2011). From SIHRN to Post-War North and East: The limits of the peace through development paradigm in Sri Lanka. In StokkeK.UyangodaJ. (Eds), Liberal peace in question: Politics of state and market reforms in Sri Lanka (pp. 103–120). London: Anthem.
58.
RichmondO.P. (2007). The transformation of peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
RichmondO.P.FranksJ. (2009). Liberal peace transitions: Between statebuilding and peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
RisteO. (2001). Norway’s foreign relations: A history. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
62.
RothsteinR. (1968). Alliances and small powers. New York: Columbia University Press.
63.
RottemS.V. (2007). The Ambivalent Ally: Norway in the New NATO. Contemporary Security Policy, 28(3), 619–638.
64.
RottemS.V.HønnelandG. (2008). Småstat og energistormakt. Norges sikkerhetspolitiske rolle i nord [Small state and energy superpower. Norway’s security role in the North]. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
65.
SaidE.W. (2001). The end of the peace process: Oslo and after. New York: Vintage.
66.
ShanmugaratnamN.StokkeK. (2008). Development as a precursor to conflict resolution: A critical review of the fifth peace process in Sri Lanka. In ShanmugaratnamN. (Ed.), Between war and peace in Sudan and Sri Lanka: Deprivation and livelihood revival (pp. 93–115). Oxford: James Currey.
67.
SkånlandØ.H. (2008). Norway is a peace nation: Discursive preconditions for the Norwegian peace engagement policy. Master’s thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
68.
SouthA. (2008). Ethnic politics in Burma: States of conflict. London: Routledge.
69.
SteinbergD.L.FanH. (2012). Modern China–Myanmar relations: Dilemmas of mutual dependence. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
70.
SteinmetzR.WivelA. (2010). Small states in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. London: Ashgate.
71.
StokkeK.UyangodaJ. (Eds). (2011). Liberal peace in question: Politics of state and market reforms in Sri Lanka. London: Anthem.
ThuneH.LundeL. (2013). Hva Norge kan være i verden [What Norway can be in the world]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
76.
TojeA. (2010). Norsk utenrikspolitikk: En kritikk [Norwegian foreign policy. A critique]. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 27(1–2): 207–215.
77.
TorfingJ. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
78.
UdgaardN.M. (1973). Great power politics and Norwegian foreign policy. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
79.
UyangodaJ.PereraM. (Eds). (2003). Sri Lanka’s peace process 2002: Critical perspectives. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Social Scientists’ Association.
80.
VidraR.K.MajidM.HaackeJ.WestadA.CoxM.KitchenN. (2012). The new geopolitics of Southeast Asia. London: London School of Economics, Ideas Special Report.
81.
WendtA. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
WaageH.H. (2005). Norway’s role in the Middle East peace talks: Between a strong state and a weak belligerent. Journal of Palestine Studies, 34(4), 6–24.
83.
WaageH.H. (2007). The ‘Minnow’ and the ‘Whale’: Norway and the United States in the peace process in the Middle East. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 34(2), 157–176.
