Area studies in India have evolved as a discipline within public institutions, reflecting the plurality of discourses that define the profile of institutions in the country. Many Area studies experts share the policy narratives of the state, but there are many who do not subscribe to them and still some others even challenge them. In that sense, the discipline has maintained a large measure of intellectual autonomy. It is this autonomy that quite often irritates those who want to see a very homogenous and monolithic discourse emanating generally from ‘world class institutions’.
AlagappaMuthiah. (2009). Strengthening international studies in India: Vision and recommendations. International Studies, 46(1&2), January & April, 7–35.
2.
AppadoraiA. (1936). Economic conditions of Southern India (circa 1000 to 1500), 2 Vols. Madras: Madras University Press.
3.
AppadoraiA. (1987). International and area studies in India. International Studies, 24(2), April, 133–143.
4.
AshirvathamE. (1944). Teaching of political science in South Indian universities. Indian Journal of Political Science, 5(4), December, 329–337.
5.
BajpaiKanti. (2009). Obstacles to good work in Indian international relations. International Studies, 46(1&2), January & April, 109–128.
6.
BatabyalRakesh (2007). Penguin book of modern Indian speeches. New Delhi: Penguin Publishers.
7.
BatabyalRakesh (2013). Making of India’s national university. New Delhi: Harper Collins (forthcoming).
8.
BirayKolluoglu-Kirli. (2003). From orientalism to area studies. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), February, 93–111.
9.
BrownChris. (2009). The development of international relations theory in the United Kingdom: Traditions, contemporary perspectives and trajectories. International Studies, Special Issue, 46(1 & 2), January & April, 221–238.
10.
DasturAloo Jehanbux. (1954). Man and his environment. Bombay: Popular Book Depot.
11.
DesaiA.R. (1948). Social background of Indian nationalism. Bombay: Popular Book Depot.
FisherD. (1993). Fundamental development of the social sciences: Rockefeller philanthropy and the United States social science research council. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
GeigerRoger L. (1988). American foundation and academic social sciences 1945–1960. Minerva, 26(3), Autumn, 315–341.
15.
GopalP. Venkateswar. (1953). Ideological conflict in Indian political life. Ph.D. Thesis. Bombay: Bombay University.
16.
GopalS. (1984). Jawaharlal Nehru: A biography. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
17.
International Studies (2009). Special Issue: International studies in India, 46(1 & 2), January & April, 1–270.
18.
LeslieStuart A. (1993). The Cold War and the American science: Military industrial complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
LowenRebeca. (1997). Creating a Cold War university: The transformation of Stanford. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
20.
MasaldanP.N. (1942). Provincial autonomy and its working in the united provinces. Lucknow: Lucknow University.
21.
MiyoshiMasaoHarootunianH.D. (2002). Learning places: The afterlives of area studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
22.
MohanC. Raja. (2009). The re-making of Indian foreign policy: Ending the marginalization of international relations community. International Studies, 46(1&2), January & April, 147–164.
23.
MorganJamie. (2004). The history of contemporary area studies: Philosophy, emergent causal relations, and nontriviality of sociology of knowledge. China Review International, 11(2), April, 215–247.
24.
PhadnisUrmila. (1990). Ethnicity and nation-building in South Asia. New Delhi: SAGE.
25.
RanaA.P. (1988). International relations. Delhi: ICSSR and Allied Publishers.
26.
SahniVarun. (2009). Fallacies and flaws of area studies in India. International Studies, 46(1&2), January &April, 49–68.
27.
SirsikarV.M. (1979). Studies on political parties and pressure groups. In ICSSR, Survey of Research in Political Science, Political system, Vol. 1. Delhi: Allied Publishers and ICSSR.
28.
TandonViswanath (1965). Social and poltical philosophy of sarvodaya after Gandhiji. Varanasi: Sarva Seva Sangh Prakashan.
29.
YaqingQin. (2009). Development of international relations theory in China. International Studies, 46(1 & 2), January & April, 185–202.
