Over the course of the last decade, students of Chinese foreign relations have engaged in an extended, and often rather breathless, debate over the meaning of China’s changing international profile. The question for all those with an interest in Asian security, and the wider international order, has become: what does China want to do with its new-found power? This article rests upon the conviction that national identity, rather than nationalism alone, stands at the centre of such issues. The latter of these two has attracted more attention. However, it tends to lead analysts to only see a narrow bandwidth of identity formation within a country, whereas the former is more inclusive of the potential variety of collective constructs that are in play in a given location. From within such a framework, it is then possible to both examine the production of Chinese collective imaginings and explore the role that they play in framing China’s interaction with the rest of the international system.
AbdelalR.HerreraY.JohnstonA.I.McDermottR. (2009). Measuring identity: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
CallahanW. (2004). Contingent states: Greater China and transnational relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
CallahanW. (2005). The limits of Chinese nationalism: ‘China Threat Theory’ and identity construction. Paper presented at the International Studies Association conference, San Diego, California.
CarlsonA. (2008). The fluidity of the foundations of Chinese soft power. Cultural Power Asia Conference. Unpublished conference paper, Frankfurt, Germany.
6.
CarlsonA. (2009). A flawed perspective: The limitations inherent within the study of Chinese nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 15(1), January, 20–35.
7.
CarlsonA. (2011). Moving beyond sovereignty?: A brief consideration of recent changes in China’s approach to international order and the emergence of the Tianxia concept. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), January, 89–102.
CarlsonA. (2012b). Reimagining the frontier: Patterns of sinicization and the emergence of new thinking about China’s territorial periphery. In KatzensteinP. (Ed.), Sinicization and the rise of China (pp. 41–65). New York: Routledge.
10.
Cranmer-ByngJ. (1973.) The Chinese view of their place in the world: A historical perspective. The China Quarterly, 53(January–March), 67–79.
11.
DittmerL.KimS.S. (Eds). (1993). China’s quest for national identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
FairbankJohn K. (Ed.). (1968). The Chinese world order. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
GoldsteinS. (1994). Nationalism and internationalism: Sino-Soviet relations. In RobinsonThomasShambaughDavid (Eds), Chinese foreign policy: Theory and practice (pp. 224–265). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
GriesP. (2005). China’s new nationalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
GuangLei (2005) Realpolitik nationalism: International sources of Chinese nationalism. Modern China, October, 487–514.
16.
GuoY. (2004). Cultural nationalism in contemporary China: The search for national identity under reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
HeB. (2000). Nationalism, national identity and democratization in China. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
18.
HughesC. (2006). Chinese nationalism in the global era. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
JohnsonC. (1962). Peasant nationalism and communist power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
KrolikowskiA. (2008). State personhood in ontological security theories of international relations and Chinese nationalism: A skeptical view. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(1), Summer, 109–133.
21.
Le S. (2004). Qianliu (Undercurrents), Huadong shifan daxue chubanshe. Shanghai: East China University.
Qin Y. (2003). Guojia shenfen, zhanlue wenhua he anquan liyi [National identity, strategic culture, and security interests]. Shijie Jingji yu Zhenghi, 1.
24.
Qin Y. (2007). Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 7(3), July, 313–340.
25.
ReillyJ. (2011). Strong society, smart state: The rise of public opinion in China’s Japan policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Ren X. (2010). The international relations theoretical discourse in China: One world, different explanations. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 15(1), Spring, 99–116.
27.
RozmanG. (2012). East Asian national identities: Common roots and Chinese exceptionalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
ShambaughD. (2011). Coping with a conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly, 34(1), Winter, 7–27.
29.
ShihC.Y. (1998). National role conception as foreign policy motivation: The psychocultural bases of Chinese diplomacy. Political Psychology, 9(4), December, 626–627.
30.
ShihC.Y. (2004). Navigating sovereignty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
StockmannD.JohnstonA. (2006). Chinese attitudes toward the United States and Americans. In KatzensteinPeter (Ed.), Anti-Americanism in world politics (pp. 157–196). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
WeissJ. (2008). Powerful patriots: Nationalism, diplomacy and the strategic logic of anti-foreign protest. Unpublished Dissertation Manuscript. University of California, San Diego, Department of Political Science.
33.
Yan X. (2008). Xun Zi’s thoughts on international politics and their implications. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(1), January, 135–165.
34.
ZhaoS. (2004). A nation-state by construction: Dynamics of modern Chinese nationalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
