This article argues that a protracted conflict, in general, has strengthened the state vis-à-vis the society in Egypt, Israel, South Korea, Syria and Taiwan. Yet, the existentially threatened states, namely, Israel, South Korea and Taiwan, have pursued economic development and industrialization as a strategic objective. While all three states have been strategically important for the hegemon, the United States, the latter has encouraged them to adopt an export-oriented strategy and opened its own market to their exports. Given the rise in state strength, an existentially threatened state becomes more capable of extracting taxes and mobilizing the society for industrialization. Both Egypt and Syria, in contrast, were merely engaged in a protracted conflict. Consequently, they were not under pressure to maximize their power through industrialization and/or export-led growth strategy, and each explored, in its own unique way, short-cut solutions for regaining its occupied territory.
Abdel-Fadil, Mahmoud. 1980. The Political Economy of Nasserism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Aharoni, Yair. 1976. Mevneh Vehitnahgut Bameshek Hayesraeli (Structure and Behavior of the Israeli Economy) (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Goma.
3.
Aharoni, Yair. 1991. Hacalcala Hapolitit Beyisrael (The Political Economy of Israel) (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.
4.
Ambrose, Stephen. 1993. Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy since 1938. New York: Penguin Books.
5.
Amsden, Alice H.1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. London: Oxford University Press.
6.
Beblawi, Hazem. 1990. ‘The Rentier State in the Arab World’, in G. Luciani, ed., The Arab State. London: Routledge, pp. 85–98.
7.
Ben-Zvi, Abraham. 1998. Decade of Transition: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the Origins of the American–Israeli Alliance. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
Berglas, Eitan. 2001. ‘Netel Habitahon vehameshek hayesraeli’ (Defence Burden and the Israeli Economy), in Avi Ben-Bassat, ed., Memeoravoot Mimshaltit Lecalcalat Shook, Hameshek Hayesraeli 1985–1998 (From Government Intervention to Market Economy: The Israeli Economy, 1985–1998) (Hebrew), pp. 199–229. Tel Aviv: Am Oved.
9.
Bonen, Zeev. 1994. ‘The Israeli Defense Industry: Past and Future’, RUSI Journal, vol. 139, no. 3, June, pp. 56–59.
10.
Breznitz, Dan. 2007. Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Bush, Richard C. Iii. 1992. ‘Role of the U.S. in Taiwan–PRC Relations’, in Denis Fred Simon and Michael Y.M. Kau, eds, Taiwan Beyond the Economic Miracle. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 345–68.
12.
Chan, Steve. 1988. ‘Defense Burden and Economic Growth: Unraveling the Taiwanese Enigma’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 913–20.
13.
Doner, Richard F., Brian K. Ritchie and Dan Slater. 2005. ‘Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective’, International Organization, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 327–61.
14.
Evans, Peter B.1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
15.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Graham, Norman A.1991. ‘The Role of the Military in the Political and Economic Development of the Republic of Korea’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 26, nos. 1–2, April, pp. 114–31.
18.
Griffin, Keith. 1973. ‘An Assessment of Development in Taiwan’, World Development, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 31–42.
19.
Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman. 1989. ‘Endogenous Product Cycle’, NBER Working Papers 2913, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
20.
Grossman, Gene M.. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
21.
Haggard, Stephan. 1988. ‘The Politics of Industrialization in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan’, in Helen Hughes, ed., Achieving Industrialization in East Asia, pp. 260–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Haggard, Stephan and Chung-In Moon. 1983. ‘The Korean State in the International Economy: Liberal, Dependent, or Mercantile?’ in John Ruggie, ed., The Antinomies of Interdependence: National Welfare and the International Division of Labor, pp. 131–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Harik, Iliya. 1997. Economic Policy Reforms in Egypt. Miami: University Press of Florida.
24.
Jackson, Robert H.1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Jacobs, Norman. 1989. ‘The Contribution of Patrimonial Theory in Explaining the Roots of and Guiding Asian Development in the Twenty First Century: Theoretical Introduction’, Asian Perspective vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 5–34.
26.
Kang, David C.1995. ‘South Korean and Taiwanese Development and the New Institutional Economics’, International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 555–87.
27.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Enquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
Klein, Donald W.1992. ‘The Political Economy of Taiwan’s International Commercial Links,’ in Denis Fred Simon and Michael Y.M. Kao, eds, Taiwan Beyond the Economic Miracle, pp. 257–73. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
29.
Ko Shu-Ling. 2003. ‘Taiwan’s 24th in Development Index Ranking’, Taipei Times, 2 December. Available at http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2003/12/02/2003078035
30.
Krugman, Paul R. and Maurice Obstfeld. 2000. International Economics: Theory and Policy. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
31.
Lee, Yeon-Ho. 1997. The State, Society and Big Business in South Korea. London: Routledge.
32.
Lifshitz, Yaacov. 2000. Calcalat Betahon: Hateoria Haclalit Vehamekrey Israeli (Defence Economics: The General Theory and the Israeli Case) (Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israeli Studies.
33.
Migdal, Joel S.1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
Moran, Jon. 1999. ‘Patterns of Corruption and Development in East Asia’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 569–87.
35.
Noland, Marcus. 2000. Avoiding the Apocalypse: The Future of the Two Koreas. Washington, D.C.: The Peterson Institute of International Economics.
36.
Park, Kun Y.1993. ‘Pouring New Wine into Fresh Wineskins: Defense Spending and Economic Growth in LDCs with Application to South Korea’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 79–93.
37.
Perthes, Volker. 1995. The Political Economy of Syria under Asad. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
38.
Ranis, Gustav. 1990. ‘Contrasts in the Political Economy of Development Policy Change’, in Gary Gereffi and Donald L. Wyman, eds, Manufacturing Miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 207–30.
39.
Ranis, Gustav. 2002. ‘Lessons from Taiwan’s Performance: Neither Miracle nor Crisis’, in Peter C. Chow, ed., Taiwan in the Global Economy: From an Agrarian Economy to an Exporter of High-Tech Products. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 3–22.
40.
Rhee, Jong-Chan. 1994. The State and Industry in South Korea: The Limits of the Authoritarian State. London: Routledge.
41.
Richards, Alan and John Waterbury. 1990. A Political Economy of the Middle East: State, Class and Economic Development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42.
Rodrik, Dani. 1999. The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
SIPRI. 2005. ‘The SIPRI Military Expenditure Database’, http://www.sipri.org. Accessed on 24 July 2005.
44.
Stone, Randall W.2004. ‘The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa’, American Political Science Review, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 577–91.
45.
Stubbs, R.1999. ‘War and Economic Development: Export-oriented Industrialization in East and Southeast Asia’, Comparative Politics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 337–55.
46.
Thurow, Lester C.1996. The Future of Capitalism: How Today’s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow’s World. New York: Penguin Books.
47.
Tien, Hung-Mao. 1992. ‘Taiwan’s Evolution toward Democracy: A Historical Perspective’, in Fred Simon and Michael Y.M. Kau, eds, Taiwan Beyond the Economic Miracle, pp. 3–23. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
48.
UNDP. 1995. Human Development Report 1995. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
49.
UNDP. 2002. Arab Human Development Report 2002: Creating Opportunities for Future Generations. New York: United Nations Publications.
50.
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of the Government in Taiwan’s Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51.
Waldner, David. 1999. State Building and Late Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
52.
Waterbury, John. 1983. Egypt of Nasser and Sadat: The Political Economy of Two Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
Waterbury, John. 1985. ‘The “Soft State” and the Open Door: Egypt’s Experience with Economic Liberalization, 1974–1984’, Comparative Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 65–84.
54.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith Jung-En, ed. 1991. Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith Jung-En. 1998. ‘National Security and the Rise of the Developmental State in South Korea and Taiwan’, in Henry S. Rowan, ed., Behind East Asian Growth, pp. 319–40. New York: Routledge.
57.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith Jung-En. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
58.
World Bank. 2005. 2005World Development Indicators, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
59.
Yapp, Malcolm. 1996. The Near East since the First World War: A History to 1995. London: Longman.
