Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The founding fathers did not designate English—or any other language—as the official language of the United States (US). It would be moot to ask if they considered it necessary to lay down in law what existed in fact, or whether they desisted from granting official language status to English out of their respect for ‘language minorities’ already in the new republic. Attempts were made from the early days of the republic to standardize their English language in the US for both practical and lexicographic purposes. But no movement aimed at making English the official language of the US emerged till 1981. The ‘Official English’ (deridingly called English Only) movement has till date got twenty-seven states to adopt it as their official language. Its first national success came when the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 123 in 1996 declaring English as the official language. This success, though, was short-lived as the bill lapsed due to the Senate inaction. The second national success came when the Senate passed the English Language Amendment to the latest Immigration Reform Bill, designating English as America's ‘national language’. However, the Democratic Party's opposition to Official English and the Republican Party's reluctance to officially associate with Official English means that the movement has a long way to traverse.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, Charles Francis (ed.). 1852. The Works of John Adams. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown & Co .

Baron, Dennis . 1990. The English-Only Question: An Official Language for Americans? New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press .

Branigin, William . 1998. ‘ Immigrants Shunning Ideas of Assimilation ’, The Washington Post, 25 May, p. A1 .

Buchanan, Patrick J. 2002. The Death of the West. New York: St. Martin's Press .

Burrell, Cassandra . 1996. ‘House Passes Official English Bill’, English Only Update EXTRA, 8 August, http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/linguistics/people/grads/macswan/updateex.htm, accessed on 2 January 2007.

Crawford, James (ed.). 1992. Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy Chicago, Illinois.: The University of Chicago Press .

Donahue, Thomas S. 1985. ‘ U.S. English: Its Life and Works ’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 56, pp. 99–112 .

Ford, W.C. (ed.). 1889. Writings of George Washington, vol. XII. New York: Russell .

Gingrich, Newt . 1995. To Renew America. New York: Harper Collins .

10.

Gordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press .

11.

Gorov, Lynda . 1999. ‘ Texas town makes Spanish official, stirs war of words ’, Boston Globe, 28 August, p. E08 .

12.

Hayakawa, S.I. 1987. ‘ Why English should be our Official Language ’. The Education Digest, vol. 52, May, pp. 36–37 .

13.

Heath, Shirley Brice . 1976. ‘ A National Language Academy? Debate in the New Nation ’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 11, pp. 9–43 .

14.

Heath, Shirley Brice . 1981. ‘English in our language heritage’, in Charles A. Ferguson and Shirley B. Heath (eds), Language in the USA. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6–20.

15.

Heath, Shirley Brice . 1983. ‘ Language Policies ’, Society, vol. 20, no. 4, May–June, pp. 56–63 .

16.

Hobbes, Thomas . 1973 (Reprint). Leviathan. London: Penguin .

17.

Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who Are We? America's Great Debate. New Delhi: Penguin .

18.

Imhoff, Gary . 1990. ‘ The Position of U.S. English on Bilingual Education ’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 508, March, pp. 48–61 .

19.

Kjolseth, Rolf . 1983. ‘ Cultural Politics of Bilingualism ’, Society, vol. 20, no. 4, May–June, pp. 40–48 .

20.

Labaree, Leonard W. (ed.). 1966 (Reprint). Benjamin Franklin Papers. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press .

21.

Mann, Arthur . 1992. ‘From Immigration to Acculturation’, in Luther S. Luedtke (ed.). Making America: The Society and Culture of the United States. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press , pp. 68–82.

22.

Mencken, H.L. 1921. The American Language: An Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States. New York: Alfred A. Knopf .

23.

Ray, Saumyajit. 2006a. An Official language for America: The Republican Party and the English Only Movement in the United States since 1981. Unpublished thesis (submitted to Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi).

24.

Ray, Saumyajit . 2006b. ‘ Official, at last: Bush and immigration ’, Central Chronicle (Bhopal), 5 June, http://www.centralchronicle.com/20060605/0506301.htm, accessed 2 January 2007.

25.

Simpson, David . 1986. The Politics of American English, 1776–1850. New York: Oxford University Press .

26.

Public Interest Profiles, 1998–99. 1998. ‘U.S. English Foundation, Inc. (1983)’, Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Foundation for Public Affairs , p. 214.

27.

Webster, Noah . 1789. Reprint 1967. Dissertation on the English Language; With Notes, Historical and Critical. Boston, Massachusetts: Isaiah Thomas and Company .

28.

Whitworth, Damian . 1999. ‘ Texas town bars English ’, The Statesman (Calcutta), 15 August, p. 20 .

29.

Yang, John E. 1996. ‘ House Votes for Official English Language ’, SouthCoast Today, 2 August, http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/08-96/08-02-96/a05wn027.htm, accessed 2 January 2007.

Politics over Official Language in the United States

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References