Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The human security concept centred around rights is a radical departure from the traditional state-centric approach to security issues. However this paradigm needs to be engendered because experience has shown that the concept of “people” still leaves out women, especially those at the margins. Threats from militarism, patriarchy, chauvinism, sectarianism, poverty and denial of rights affect women differently than they do men and since structures and institutions of power remain patriarchal, there is need for a gender balance as well as a feminization of security. Many countries in principle accept people's rights and yet discriminate against women in practice. It is time that steps like evolving gendered security indicators in order to assess the threats to human security are brought on the security agenda.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axworthy, Lloyd . 2004. “A New Scientific Field and Policy Lens” , Security Dialogue, vol. 35, no. 3.

Bajpai, Kanti . 2003. “The Idea of Human Security” , International Studies, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 195–228 .

Chenoy, Anuradha M . 2002. Militarism and Women in South Asia. New Delhi: Kali for Women Publication .

Cockburn, Cynthia . 2001. “The Gendered Dynamics of Armed Conflict and Political Violence”, in Caroline O.N. Moser and Fiona C. Clark (eds), Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence. New Delhi: Kali for Women .

Eisler, Raine . 2003. Work, Values and Caring: The Economic Imperative for Revisioning the Rules of the Game. Pacific Grove, CA: Center for Partnership Studies .

Enloe, Cynthia . 1998. “All the Men are Militias, All the Women are Victims: The Politics of Masculinity and Femininity in Nationalist Wars”, in Lois Lorentzen and Jennifer Turpin (eds), The Women and War Reader, pp. 50–62. New York: New York University Press .

Gaffney, Frank, Jr . 2004. “There May be President Makers…” , Washington Times, 28 September.

Hoogensen, Gunhild and Svein Rottem . no year. “Gender Identity and the Subject o Security” , Security Dialogue, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 55–171 .

Human Security Now. 2003. New York: Commission on Human Security, United Nations .

10.

Liota, P.H . 2002. “Boomerang Effect: The Converging of National and Human Security” , Security Dialogue, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 473–488 .

11.

Moier, Caronine O.N . and Fiona C. Clark (eds). 2001. Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence. New Delhi: Kali for Women .

12.

Pickup, Francine , Susanne Williams and Carol Sweetman . 2001. Ending Violence Against Women: A Challenge for Development and Humanitarian Work. London: Oxfam .

13.

Thakur, Ramesh . 2004. “A Political Worldview” , Security Dialogue, vol. 35, no. 4.

14.

Turshen, Meredeth . 2001. “The Political Economy of Rape: An Analysis of Systematic Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women during Armed Conflict in Africa”, in Caroline O.N. Moser and Fiona C. Clark (eds), Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence, pp. 55–57. New Delhi: Kali for Women .

15.

United Nations. 2003. Commission on Human Security: Human Security Now. New York: United Nations .

16.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2003. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press .

A Plea for Engendering Human Security

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References