This article proposes re-evaluating traditional views of empathy in child welfare work, advocating for recognizing the role of affect in empathic relationships. Traditionally, clinical empathy has been described as a unidirectional relationship where clinical workers must remain neutral, setting aside their perceptual frameworks to become ‘mirrors’ of their clients. Through a grounded theory analysis of data collected in Chile, this article reveals that child welfare workers establish dynamic empathic connections via ‘Empathy Affect’. The study underscores the importance of affective dimensions in social work practice and policy design.
ArnoldK (2014) Behind the mirror: Reflective listening and its Tain in the work of Carl Rogers. The Humanistic Psychologist42: 354–369.
2.
CaringiJLawsonHDevlinM (2012) Planning for emotional labor and secondary traumatic stress in child welfare organizations. Journal of Family Strengths12: 11.
CoplanAGoldieP (2011) Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CrombyJ (2012) Feeling the way: Qualitative clinical research and the affective turn. Qualitative Research in Psychology9(1): 88–98.
6.
CuffBMPBrownSJTaylorL, et al (2016) Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review8(2): 144–153.
7.
DaviesBGannonS (2006) Doing Collective Biography. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
8.
DenzinN (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative ResearchI(I): 23–46.
9.
EllisADrydenW (1997) The Practice of Relational Emotive Behavioral Therapy. Cham: Springer.
10.
EncisoG (2015) Una travesía de las emociones al afecto en las prácticas del poliamor. PhD Thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.
11.
Farias AntogniniA (2019) Políticas sociales en Chile. Trayectoria de inequidades y desigualdades en distribución de bienes y servicios. Santiago: Ediciones UAH.
12.
FlyvbjergB (2011) Case study. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 301–316.
13.
Garcia-MenesesJChanez-CortésIFardella-CisternasC, et al (2021) Huellas afectivas del trabajo en política de protección a la infancia. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud20(1): 1–22.
14.
GençBBuzS (2020) Child welfare workers’ resilience and coping styles in Ankara, Turkey. International Social Work63(5): 597–611.
15.
GerdesKSegalE (2011) Importance of empathy for social work practice: Integrating new science. Social Work56(2): 141–148.
Gómez CruzEArdèvolE (2013) Ethnography and the field in media(ted) studies: A practice theory approach. Westminster Papers9(1): 27–46.
18.
GrantDHarariE (2011) Empathy in psychoanalytic theory and practice. Psychoanalytic Inquiry31(1): 3–16.
19.
GreenbergL (2018) Clinical Handbook of Emotion-Focused Therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Halevi HochwaldIArieliDRadomyslskyZ, et al (2022) Emotion work and feeling rules: Coping strategies of family caregivers of people with end stage dementia in Israel – A qualitative study. Dementia21(4): 1154–1172.
21.
HarrisS (2015) An Invitation to the Sociology of Emotions. London: Routledge.
22.
HjärpeT (2023) Negotiating organisational and professional feeling rules: On digital documentation and emotions in child protection social work. Emotions and Society5(1): 10–28.
23.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
Jara LeivaMJ (2021) Más allá del «fin al Sename»: El cuidado residencial de la niñez y el proceso constituyente. Anuario de Derechos Humanos17(1): 69–84.
25.
JordanJ (2017) Relational–Cultural Therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
KrugOTSchneiderKJ (2016) Essential dimensions of supervision, consultation, and training in existential-humanistic therapy. In: KrugOTSchneiderKJ (eds) Supervision Essentials for Existential-humanistic Therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 25–38.
27.
Morales AguileraP (2015) Trabajo social en Chile (1925–2015). Noventa años de historia e impronta en latinoamérica. AZARBE. Revista Internacional de Trabajo Social y Bienestar4: 21–28.
28.
MoudatsouMStavropoulouAPhilalithisA, et al (2020) The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare8(1): 26.
MullinsJ (2011) A framework for cultivating and increasing child welfare workers’ empathy toward parents. Journal of Social Service Research37(3): 242–253.
31.
NishidaA (2017) Relating through differences: Disability, affective relationality, and the U.S. public healthcare assemblage. Subjectivity10(1): 89–103.
32.
PadwellC (2014) Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
PinkSFergusonHKellyL (2022) Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work21(2): 413–430.
35.
PinkSHorstJPostillL, et al (2016) Etnografía Digital. Madrid: Morata.
36.
RodríguezJSalinasD (2009) Diagnosing competences in the School of Social Work at the Pontificia Universidad Católica in Valparaiso (Chile). Culture and Education21(3): 291–303.
37.
RosaGNavarro-SeguraLLópezP (2014) Learning process of social skills at university level: Analysis of a training experience in social education and social work degrees. Formación Universitaria7(4): 25–38.
38.
Ruiz-JuncoN (2017) Advancing the sociology of empathy: A proposal. Symbolic Interaction40(3): 414–435.
39.
Ruiz-JuncoN (2021) Empathy, intersubjectivity, and the self. In: AbrutynSLizardoO (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Cham: Springer, pp. 543–557.
40.
SeigworthGGreggM (2010) An inventory of shimmers. In: SeigworthGGreggM (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–25.
41.
United Nations (UN) (2002) Examen de los informes presentados por los estados partes en virtud del artículo 44 de la convención: Observaciones finales del Comité sobre los Derechos del Niño. Chile; New York: UN.
42.
United Nations (UN) (2015) Observaciones finales sobre los informes periódicos cuarto y quinto combinados de Chile. Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Report CRC/C/CHL/4-5. New York: UN.
VokesRAtukundaG (2021) Fieldwork through the Zoomiverse. Anthropology in Action28: 73–78.
45.
WagamanMGeigerJShockleyC, et al (2015) The role of empathy in burnout, compassion satisfaction, and secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Social Work60(3): 201–209.
46.
WatsonJC (2021) Responsiveness in emotion-focused therapy. In: WatsonJCWisemanH (eds) The Responsive Psychotherapist: Attuning to Clients in the Moment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 171–194.
47.
WhitakerE (2019) ‘Bring yourself to work’: Rewriting the feeling rules in ‘personalized’ social work. Journal of Organizational Ethnography8(3): 325–338.
48.
WilsonJ (2011) Psychodrama and cognitive behavioral therapy: Complementary companions Part I. The Group Psychologist49: 1–19.
49.
YuCCTanLLeMK, et al (2022) The development of empathy in the healthcare setting: A qualitative approach. BMC Medical Education22(1): 245.
