This study investigates the evolving ways in which social workers helped provide food assistance during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in communities in South Africa and the United States. A cross-national qualitative methodology was used to collect data about the nutritional services social workers delivered, the types of social capital used to assist in these efforts, and the challenges they experienced. This study not only highlights differences in the approaches of these two countries but also how these different communities might be able to learn from one another in delivering food relief during times of emergency.
BarneyRJ (2020) How social workers can use a human rights approach to disasters: Lessons learned from the international community. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work5(1): 28–38.
3.
BeheraJK (2023) Role of social capital in disaster risk management: A theoretical perspective in special reference to Odisha, India. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology20(3): 3385–3394.
4.
BeilmannMKoots-AusmeesLRealoA (2018) The relationship between social capital and individualism-collectivism in Europe. Social Indicators Research137: 641–664.
5.
BirdPCampbell-HallVKakumaR, et al. (2013) Cross-national qualitative research: The development and application of an analytic framework in the mental health and poverty project. International Journal of Social Research Methodology16(4): 337–349.
6.
BurgessDShierML (2018) Food insecurity and social work: A comprehensive literature review. International Social Work61(6): 826–842.
7.
ChappleAZieblandS (2018) Methodological and practical issues in cross-national qualitative research: Lessons from the literature and a comparative study of the experiences of people receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Qualitative Health Research28(5): 789–799.
8.
DylanACammaertJ (2022) Nutritional social work: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Social Work22(2): 323–344.
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2022) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022. Rome: FAO.
11.
Fukuda-ParrSTaylorV (2015) Food Insecurity in South Africa: Human Rights and Entitlement Perspectives. Cape Town, South Africa: UCT Press.
12.
FussAABlockHIDean-AssaelK, et al. (2021) Supporting families struggling with food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic: An innovative cross sector collaboration. Social Work in Health Care60(2): 157–165.
13.
JamesHPatonD (2015) Social capital and the cultural contexts of disaster recovery outcomes in Myanmar and Taiwan. Global Change, Peace & Security27(2): 207–228.
14.
JovitaHDNashirHMutiarinD, et al. (2019) Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment29(4): 519–534.
15.
McClearyJSWielingE (2017) Forced displacement and alcohol use in two Karen refugee communities: A comparative qualitative study. The British Journal of Social Work47(4): 1186–1204.
16.
MorsutCKuranCKrukeBI, et al. (2021) Linking resilience, vulnerability, social capital and risk awareness for crisis and disaster research. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management30(2): 137–147.
PadgettDK (2016) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20.
PartelowS (2021) Social capital and community disaster resilience: Post earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawanga, Indonesia. Sustainability Science16: 203–220.
TurnerDW (2010) Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report15(3): 754–760.
24.
WoolcockM (2001) The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research2(1): 11–17.
25.
WorkieEMackolilJNyikaJ, et al. (2020) Deciphering the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food security, agriculture and livelihoods. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability2: 100014.
