This article presents the results of a comparative study investigating work-related stressors (WRSs) that accompany German and Finnish school social workers (SSWs) while assessing children’s well-being. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in combination with the case vignette technique. The interview data were subjected to a coding process and visualized with the MAXQDA software program. The findings are embedded in the respective country-specific socio-political and legislative context and suggest that the SSWs are confronted with several, but different WRSs, depending on whether they have a child protection mandate (Germany) or not (Finland). Recommendations are generated based on the findings.
AhtolaA.NiemiP. (2013) ‘Does it Work in Finland? School Psychological Services within a Successful System of Basic Education’, School Psychology International35(2): 136–51.
3.
AspalterC. (2019) ‘Ten Ideal-Typical Worlds of Welfare Regimes and Their Regime Characteristics’, in GreveB. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn, pp. 300–13. London; New York: Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
4.
AuerbachC.F.SilversteinL.B. (2003) Qualitative Studies in Psychology. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: New York University Press.
5.
BakkerA.B.DemeroutiE. (2007) ‘The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art’, Journal of Managerial Psychology22(3): 309–28.
6.
BaldschunA.HämäläinenJ.TöttöP.RantonenO.SaloP. (2019) ’ Job-strain and well-being among Finnish social workers: Exploring the differences in occupational well-being between child protection social workers and social workers without duties in child protection’, European Journal of Social Work22(1): 43–58.
BathkeS.A.BückenM.FiegenbaumD. (2019) Praxisbuch Kinderschutz interdisziplinär. Wie die Kooperation von Schule und Jugendhilfe gelingen kann [Practice Bock Interdisciplinary Child Protection. How the Cooperation between School and Youth Welfare Can Succeed]. Wiesbaden: Springer.
9.
BeckK.F. J. Hämäläinen (2020)’ Mapping the field of international comparative research in school social work’, International Social Work. Epub ahead of print 5March2020. DOI: 10.1177/0020872819897742.
10.
BeckK.F.VornanenR. (2019) ’Responding to child maltreatment: Comparison between school social work in Finland and Germany’, Journal of Comparative Social Work14(2): 5–29.
11.
BerggrenH.TrägårdhL. (2010) ‘Pippi Longstocking: The Autonomous Child and the Moral Logic of the Swedish Welfare State’, in MattssonH.WallensteinS.O. (eds) Swedish Modernism: Architecture, Consumption and the Welfare State, pp. 50–65. London: Black Dog.
EskelinenL.CaswellD. (2006) ‘Comparison of Social Work Practice in Teams Using a Video Vignette Technique in a Multi-Method Design’, Qualitative Social Work5(4): 489–503.
15.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.
ForsbergH. (2014) ‘Child-Centred Social Work in the Context of the Finnish Child Welfare Services’, in Bühler-NiederbergerD.AlberthL.EisentrautS. (eds) Kinderschutz. Wie kindzentriert sind Programme, Praktiken, Perspektiven? [Child Protection. How Child-Centric are Programs, Practices, Perspectives?], pp. 172–84. Weinheim; Basel: Beltz Juventa.
18.
GalmB.DerrR. (2011) ‘Combating Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Protection in Germany’, National Report, Deutsches Jugendinstitut, München, March.
19.
GilbertN. (1997) Combating Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GilbertN. (2012) ‘A Comparative Study of Child Welfare Systems: Abstract Orientations and Concrete Results’, Children and Youth Services Review34(3): 532–6.
21.
HetheringtonR. (2002) ‘Learning from Difference: Comparing Child Welfare Systems’, in Keynote Address at the Positive Systems of Child Welfare Conference, Waterloo, ON, 20–21 June.
22.
HussyW.SchreierM.EchterhoffG. (2010) Forschungsmethoden in psychologie und sozialwissenschaften [Research Methods in Psychology and Social Sciences]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
23.
KarasekR.A. (1979) ‘Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign’, Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–308.
24.
KindlerH.LilligS.BlümlH.MeysenT.WernerA. (eds) (2006) Handbuch Kindeswohlgefährdung Nach § 1666 BGB und Allgemeiner Sozialer Dienst (ASD). [Handbook Child Well-Being Endangerment in Accordance with Section 1666 BGB and General Social Services (ASD)]. München: Deutsches Jugendinstitut E.v.
LeeJ.-.S. (2012) ‘School Social Work in Australia’, Australian Social Work65: 552–70.
27.
LeebR.T.PaulozziL.MelansonC.SimonT.AriasI. (2008) Child Maltreatment Surveillance: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
28.
Mänttäri-van der KuipM. (2015) ‘Moral Distress among Social Workers: The Role of Insufficient Resources’, International Journal of Social Welfare25(1): 86–97.
MeeuwisseA.ScaramuzzinoR.SwärdH. (2011) ‘Everyday Realities and Visionary Ideals among Social Workers in the Nordic Countries: A Matter of Specialization and Work Tasks?’, Nordic Social Work Research1(1): 5–23.
31.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2006) Social Welfare in Finland. Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House.
32.
PeltonenH. (2010) ‘Oppilashuollon suunnitelmat ja oppilashuoltoryhmien työskentely [Planning of Pupil Welfare Work and Working of Pupil Welfare Teams]’, in RimpeläM.FröjdS.Peltonen HH. (eds) Hyvinvoinnin ja terveyden edistäminen peruspetuksessa 2009 [Promoting Well-Being and Health in Primary Education 2009], pp. 143–55. Sastamala: Finnish National Agency for Education.
33.
PösöT.SkivenesM.HestbækA.-.D. (2014) ‘Child Protection Systems within the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian Welfare States Time for a Child Centric Approach?’, European Journal of Social Work17(4): 475–90.
SoydanH. (1996) ‘Using the Vignette Method in Cross-Cultural Comparisons’, in De BernieresL.HantraisL.LavrinJ.MangenS.P. (eds) Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences, pp. 120–28. London: Pinter.
38.
StrandV.C.DoreM.M. (2009) ‘Job Satisfaction in a Stable State Child Welfare Workforce: Implications for Staff Retention’, Children and Youth Services Review31(3): 391–7.
39.
SutliefM.A. (2013) ‘Burnout in the School Social Worker: Related Individual and Organizational Factors’, Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website. Available online at: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/263
WeilertA.K. (2014) ‘Die bedeutung des kindeswohls im Rahmen der rechtfertigung körperlicher eingriffe: Grundsätzliche erwägungen unter besonderer berücksichtigung der knabenbeschneidung nach § 1631 D BGB [The Meaning of Child’s Well-Being in the Frame of Justification of Physical Intrusive Measures: Fundamental Considerations with Special Consideration of Boy Circumcision in Accordance with Section 1631 D Civil Code]’, Recht der Jugend und des Bildungswesens3: 381–99.
43.
WelchC.PiekkariR. (2006) ‘Crossing Language Boundaries: Qualitative Interviewing in International Business’, Management International Review46(4): 417–37.
44.
YerkesM.A.PeperB. (2019) ‘Welfare States and the Life Course’, in GreveB. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn, pp. 92–100. London; New York: Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
