We discuss the pandemic strategies in Sweden concerning social psychiatry during the first wave. We argue that the omission of social workers’ perspective in the COVID-19 strategy has negatively impacted clients with psychiatric disabilities and has also weakened the overall pandemic strategy.
BrightC. (2020) ‘Social Work in the Age of a Global Pandemic’, Social Work Research44(2): 83–86.
2.
EngwallK.GärdegårdA.KazemiB.StormP.ÅbergM. (2020) Coronakrisens Påverkan på Socialtjänsten - april t.o.m. september 2020. Rapport 2020:6. FoU Nordväst.
3.
IacobaeusH.FranciscoM.NordqvistC.SefyrinJ.SkillK.WihlborgE. (2019) Digitalt Utanförskap: En Forskningsöversikt. Linköping: DINO Rapport 2019:3.
4.
LipskyM. (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: SAGE.
5.
LudvigssonJ. (2020) ‘The First Eight Months of Sweden’s COVID-19 Strategy and the Key Actions and Actors That Were Involved’, Acta Paediatrica109(12): 2459–71.
6.
MarkströmU. (2020) ‘Stöd till Personer med Psykisk Funktionsnedsättning – Etablering av ett Nytt Verksamhetsfält’, Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift26(3–4): 323–40.
7.
PentiniA.LorenzW. (2020) ‘The Corona Crisis and the Erosion of “the Social” – Giving a Decisive Voice to the Social Professions’, European Journal of Social Work23(4): 543–53.
8.
PriebeS. (2015) ‘The Political Mission of Psychiatry’, World Psychiatry14(1): 1–2.
9.
TewJ. (2011) Social Approaches to Mental Distress. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
