Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article describes a quantitative cross-sectional study of a sample of 674 university students enrolled in social work programmes in four countries: Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland. The study aimed to assess HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes among participants. The median HIV-KQ-18 score for the sample was 14.0, which Carey and Schroder classify as indicating borderline low levels of knowledge. Based on the results, the authors argue that social work education and training programmes should more comprehensively address HIV/AIDS within their curricula to better equip future social workers to challenge stigmatising and exclusionary practices rooted in long-standing lack of knowledge and erroneous beliefs about the disease.

Keywords

Belgium Canada Chile HIV/AIDS social work student Switzerland

Introduction

Multiple studies have examined knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS among students in higher education (Labra, 2015; Labra et al., 2017; Maimaiti et al., 2010; Tulloch et al., 2012; Tung et al., 2013). Numerous other studies, in addition, have examined the same themes in relation to populations such as caregivers (Labra and Dumont, 2012; Vandebroek et al., 2011), men involved in sexual relations with other men (Larmarange, 2020), drug users (Wagenaar et al., 2012; Wolfe et al., 2010) and native communities (Guthrie et al., 2000; Negin et al., 2015; Sumari-de Boer et al., 2012). These studies show that the range of factors influencing knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS include education levels, religious identity, socio-economic status and personally knowing people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV/AIDS).

The literature shows also that certain practices on the part of health professionals perpetuate a stigmatisation of PLHIV/AIDS; these practices result from fear, lack of information and education, lack of contact with infected individuals and non-premeditated behaviours (Davtyan et al., 2017; Labra and Thomas, 2017). And while the emotional and psychological support of nurses and social workers has been shown to have a positive impact on infected individuals’ perceptions of their own condition (Stowers Johansen and Kohli, 2012), stigmatisation, in contrast, has been identified as a cause of physical and mental health problems, as well as the decreased use of health services (Belenko et al., 2016; Geter et al., 2018; Logie et al., 2018; Stringer et al., 2016).

Since the outbreak of the AIDS pandemic, social workers have played crucial roles in the delivery of services to people infected by HIV/AIDS, as well as in the dissemination of knowledge about the disease (Kaplan et al., 2004; Linsk, 2011). The social work discipline’s tenets and approaches have positioned it to play a highly useful role within efforts deployed to meet the complex challenges of managing the epidemic (Sacramento, 2015). Within the body of Canadian literature, only a very few studies have addressed HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes among populations of healthcare students (Hoffart et al., 2012; Jaworsky et al., 2017) and it is necessary to look further afield to identify research examining these themes in relation to populations of social work students (Handal, 2017; Koob and Harvan, 2003; Natale et al., 2010). Indeed, it seems that, over the last 20 years, few studies have aimed to examine HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes among higher education students in general (Cassidy et al., 2015; Labra et al., 2017).

This dearth of research on the subject is problematic because social workers have privileged access to not only the most affected but also the most marginalised populations of PLHIV/AIDS and must, therefore, be able to respond adequately to those populations’ prevention and intervention needs (Bowen, 2013). This is all the more so because the challenges which the pandemic presents continue to evolve, notably due to the ageing of infected populations (Beuthin et al., 2015; Hasse et al., 2011) and because social representations of the disease remain in flux (Goodwin et al., 2004; Labra, 2015). As Dubois-Arber et al. (2001) warned over 15 years ago, it is imperative to ensure that the normalisation of HIV/AIDS does not lead education programmes to forego integrating notions of prevention into their curricula, since this would lead to a regression of HIV/AIDS prevention knowledge and practices. Corroborating this forewarning, Wolf and Mitchell (2002) found that practitioners whose education had included components on HIV/AIDS were more likely to have conducted interventions than practitioners who had received no training related to the disease. Studies conducted outside Canada show that multiple social work training programmes fail to address HIV/AIDS themes, or do so summarily (Handal, 2017; Koob and Harvan, 2003; Natale et al., 2010; Rowan and Shears, 2011).

Since social representations of HIV/AIDS, as well as the life conditions of infected individuals, continue to evolve, this study aims to remedy the lacunae in the research literature, noted above, by examining levels of knowledge about and attitudes towards the disease and PLHIV/AIDS among social work students enrolled in university programmes across four countries: Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study was carried out on a convenience sample of students enrolled in social work programmes at institutions across three continents, specifically, Haute École de Namur-Liège-Luxembourg (Belgium), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (Canada), Universidad de Concepción (Chile) and Haute école de travail social et de la santé Lausanne (Switzerland). The study involved students who were enrolled during the Fall 2018 and Winter 2019 semesters, both in full-time and part-time social work studies. In September 2018, participants were invited, by way of messages sent to their institutional email accounts, to fill out a questionnaire designed to assess their knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS. Follow-up reminder messages were sent in February 2019. The study used SurveyMonkey^® software for the online questionnaire platform, accessible to participants throughout two data collection periods, that is, 17–28 September 2018 and 11–22 February 2019.

The questionnaire opened with an introduction designed to ensure free and informed consent. The first question aimed to assess social work students’ HIV/AIDS knowledge levels using a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging between ‘very low’ and ‘very high’. The participants’ knowledge levels were further measured using the Brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire (HIV-KQ-18) (Carey and Schroder, 2002). This validated scale consists of 18 points to be answered in the ‘True / False / I don’t know’ format. Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating higher levels of knowledge. A score of 13 of 18 (just above two thirds of correct answers) indicates a low level of HIV/AIDS knowledge (Wagenaar et al., 2012). The questionnaire also addressed participants’ attitudes towards HIV/AIDS, employing a series of elements: a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from ‘very low’ to ‘very high’, having personally known someone with HIV/AIDS (Yes or No), as well as closed and semi-closed questions on attitudes towards HIV/AIDS, drawn from questionnaires designed to gauge attitudes among Canada’s francophone population, developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada (Agence de la santé publique du Canada, 2003, 2006). This study has been approved by the UQAT Human Research Ethics Committee (Certificate no. 2018-06).

Data analysis

Measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated to describe the sample, in particular, in terms of the participants’ median level of knowledge and most frequently reported attitudes in relation to HIV/AIDS. The average HIV-KQ-18 score was tabulated and analysed as quartiles (very low, low, average and high levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge). An assessment of variable multicollinearity was followed by a contingency analysis (chi-square test) to ascertain the level of dependence between variables indicating HIV/AIDS-related beliefs, perceptions and knowledge (also analysed as quartiles of the average HIV-KQ-18 score).

In addition, a principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out to detect differential behaviours, that is, dominant factors, such as beliefs about and perceptions of HIV/AIDS, to categorise participants into sub-groups, defined by significant intergroup differences and less significant intragroup differences, in relation to social representations and knowledge of HIV/AIDS. Collected data were processed using IBM SPSS Statistics^® software.

Results

The participant sample was composed of 674 participants studying at institutions based in Chile (CH: 30.7%), Belgium (BE: 28.6%), Switzerland (SU: 23.1%) and Canada (CA: 10.5%). The sample was overwhelmingly composed of women (84.6%), while men represented only 14.8 percent of respondents. A majority of participants were single (67.7%), while 30.8 percent reported being in a relationship and 1.5 percent had divorced or separated. In terms of age distribution, 25.7 percent of participants were aged 19 years or younger, 54.9 percent were between 20 and 24 years of age and 19.3 percent were aged 25 years or older. More than half of the participants were unemployed (61.6%), approximately a third held part-time employment (33.0%) and a small minority held full-time jobs (5.2%). In terms of place of residence, 48.7 percent of participants lived in urban areas, 36.9 percent resided in rural communities and 14.1 percent lived in mixed urban-rural areas.

The total HIV-KQ-18 score of participants was calculated to assess student knowledge of HIV/AIDS. As shown in Table 1, below, the median score of the sample was 14.0, which, according to Carey and Schroder (2002), represents borderline low levels of knowledge. It is important to note that 36.8 percent of participants considered their level of knowledge to be high or very high, while 48.7 percent described their knowledge as average and 14.2 percent indicated low or very low knowledge levels. The study also identified participants’ sources of information on HIV/AIDS. While most respondents reported drawing on multiple sources of information, those cited most frequently were school (80.5%), television (62.2%), family and social circle (54.9%), Internet (53.4%), community organisations (39.7%), public service messages (34.7%) and physicians (31%). Tellingly, only 28.3 percent reported social work studies as a source of information on HIV/AIDS. It is noteworthy that participants had obtained information from a wide variety of sources: only 1 in 10 reported gaining information on HIV/AIDS in up to two of these sources and close to half of the respondents had drawn on three to seven of the sources, while a third reported gaining information from eight or more of the sources cited above.

Table 1.

Students’ levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge in relation to age.

Level of knowledge	Respondent’s age group
Level of knowledge	Below 20 (n = 174) (%)	20–24 (n = 371) (%)	25–29 (n = 88) (%)	30–34 (n = 16) (%)	35 and over (n = 25) (%)
Low	62.6	44.5	28.4	12.5	12.0
High	37.4	55.5	71.6	87.5	88.0
Total	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

Chi-square = 49.5 Data from the survey of social work students: comparative study Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland (2019).

Notwithstanding this informational breadth, 77.9 percent of participating students considered that the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS was low or very low. However, fully 88.3 percent of participants felt that HIV/AIDS represents a serious or relatively serious ongoing problem. It is important to mention, as well, that respondents scoring 14 or higher on the HIV-KQ-18 were proportionally more likely to know someone infected with HIV/AIDS (chi-square = 17.9). More precisely, 132 respondents (19.3%) knew someone living with HIV/AIDS; of this proportion, a majority stated that the disease had not changed (60.2%) or only slightly changed (26.7%) their behaviour towards the infected individual. The principal changes in behaviour towards PLHIV reported by participants were increased emotional support (37.3%) and empathy (24.0%).

Following the analysis of HIV-KQ-18 scores, participants were separated into two groups to ascertain whether respondents’ characteristics had an impact on levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge. The analysis showed that three characteristics had statistically significant links with knowledge levels: age, country of studies and socio-professional status.

When test scores are correlated with participants’ age, it becomes apparent that knowledge levels rise with age, thus the older the social work students, the higher their levels of knowledge on HIV/AIDS.

The second significant variable was the participants’ country of origin. The data show, for example, that Belgian students were more likely to have low levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge, while students in Switzerland generally possessed higher levels of knowledge (Table 2).

Table 2.

Students’ levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge in relation to country of origin.

Level of knowledge	Country of origin
Level of knowledge	Belgium (n = 196) (%)	Canada (n = 69) (%)	Chile (n = 207) (%)	Switzerland (n = 153) (%)	Other (n = 49) (%)
Low	61.2	34.8	46.9	27.5	42.9
High	38.8	65.2	53.1	72.5	57.1
Total	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

Chi-square = 43.2 Data from the survey of social work students: comparative study Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland (2019).

Finally, the analysis noted a dependency relationship between students’ socio-professional status and levels of knowledge about the disease: participants engaged in full-time employment were proportionally more likely to possess higher levels of knowledge on HIV/AIDS.

In terms of students’ attitudes, the data collected for the purposes of this study show that social work students convey relatively positive attitudes towards PLHIV/AIDS (see Table 3). A comparative analysis did, however, identify several elements of note. For example, participants with an HIV-KQ-18 score of 14 or higher were proportionally more likely to answer that they fully agreed that PLHIV are able to exercise professions in direct contact with the public (chi-square = 21.0).

Table 3.

Students’ attitudes towards PLHIV/AIDS as percentage of agreement with statements, by country.

Statements	Disagree	Agree	No opinion	Total
People who have HIV/AIDS scare me.	75.4	10.9	13.7	100.0
Canada	61.6	20.5	17.9	100.0
Belgium	59.4	16.1	24.5	100.0
Switzerland	76.4	9.8	13.8	100.0
Chile	96.2	2.8	0.9	100.0
People who have HIV/AIDS disgust me.	93.8	2.2	4.0	100.0
Canada	88.5	7.7	3.8	100.0
Belgium	89.4	13.3	9.3	100.0
Switzerland	95.6	1.6	2.7	100.0
Chile	98.6	1.4	0.0	100.0
People who have HIV/AIDS make me angry.	90.1	1.9	8.0	100.0
Canada	92.3	0.0	7.7	100.0
Belgium	84.8	2.8	12.4	100.0
Switzerland	85.7	2.2	12.0	100.0
Chile	98.6	1.4	0.0	100.0
People who have HIV/AIDS should be able to exercise professions in contact with the public (e.g. hairdressing).	17.8	55.1	27.1	100.0
Canada	16.7	59.0	24.3	100.0
Belgium	24.0	40.5	35.5	100.0
Switzerland	16.8	54.2	29.0	100.0
Chile	12.8	69.2	18.0	100.0
People who contract HIV/AIDS through sex or drugs are getting what they deserve.	92.3	2.8	4.9	100.0
Canada	94.9	3.9	1.2	100.0
Belgium	87.6	1.8	10.6
Switzerland	92.8	3.4	3.8	100.0
Chile	95.8	2.8	1.4	100.0
I could not have a friendship with someone infected with HIV/AIDS.	94.5	2.0	3.5	100.0
Canada	93.6	1.3	5.1	100.0
Belgium	91.2	1.5	7.3	100.0
Switzerland	92.8	3.4	3.8	100.0
Chile	96.7	2.8	0.5	100.0
The families of PLHIV/AIDS should feel shame.	98.3	0.4	1.3	100.0
Canada	97.4	1.3	1.3	100.0
Belgium	97.2	0.0	2.8	100.0
Switzerland	99.5	0.0	0.5	100.0
Chile	98.6	0.9	0.5	100.0
PLHIV/AIDS should feel shame.	97.8	0.7	1.5	100.0
Canada	94.8	2.6	2.6	100.0
Belgium	96.8	0.6	2.8	100.0
Switzerland	98.4	0.5	1.1	100.0
Chile	99.5	0.5	0.0	100.0
People who have HIV/AIDS are cursed.	94.8	1.8	3.4	100.0
Canada	93.6	3.8	2.6	100.0
Belgium	90.7	1.9	7.4	100.0
Switzerland	95.1	1.6	3.3	100.0
Chile	99.1	0.9	0.0	100.0

PLHIV: people living with HIV.

The study aimed also to assess participants’ opinions on social ostracisation of PLHIV/AIDS (see Table 4). The results show that high proportions of respondents indicated having no opinion on the statements presented in the questionnaire relative to ostracisation. Nevertheless, the answers of those who did report an opinion show that PLHIV/AIDS experience peer rejection and loss of respect in their communities. However, respondents also negated notions of other forms of ostracisation. It is imperative to note, in addition, that 52.6 percent of respondents studying in Chile disagreed with the notion that PLHIV/AIDS should be allowed to participate fully in socio-cultural activities. This is in stark contrast to answers provided by students from the other countries considered in the study. It is also noteworthy that participants’ HIV-KQ-18 scores, assessing their knowledge of the disease, seem to have no correlation with the attitudes expressed in this part of the study, except in relation to two statements, discussed below.

Table 4.

Students’ opinions on the ostracisation of PLHIV/AIDS in their communities as percentage of agreement with statements, by country.

Statements	Disagree	Agree	No opinion	Total
In my community, people who have HIV/AIDS are the targets of verbal abuse or mockery.	28.5	26.9	44.6	100.0
Canada	17.9	23.0	59.0	100.0
Belgium	24.9	34.1	41.0	100.0
Switzerland	31.9	20.8	47.3	100.0
Chile	33.2	26.0	40.8	100.0
In my community, people living with HIV/AIDS are rejected by their peers.	25.7	32.1	42.2	100.0
Canada	12.8	34.6	52.6	100.0
Belgium	27.2	33.6	39.2	100.0
Switzerland	29.8	34.0	36.2	100.0
Chile	25.6	27.9	46.4	100.0
In my community, people living with HIV/AIDS are neglected by their families.	34.2	11.5	54.3	100.0
Canada	17.9	7.7	74.4	100.0
Belgium	35.5	9.7	54.8	100.0
Switzerland	35.7	11.5	52.8	100.0
Chile	37.9	14.8	47.3	100.0
In my community, people suspected of having HIV/AIDS often lose the respect of others.	26.6	36.9	36.5	100.0
Canada	15.4	37.1	47.5	100.0
Belgium	26.3	35.5	38.2	100.0
Switzerland	29.1	35.8	35.1	100.0
Chile	28.9	39.3	31.8	100.0
In my community, people living with HIV/AIDS are the targets of physical abuse.	37.6	9.3	53.1	100.0
Canada	29.5	1.3	69.2	100.0
Belgium	35.9	10.2	53.9	100.0
Switzerland	43.1	9.4	47.5	100.0
Chile	37.6	11.4	51.0	100.0
In my community, most people do not buy vegetables or other food from a seller known to have HIV/AIDS.	33.5	23.9	42.6	100.0
Canada	26.9	19.2	53.9	100.0
Belgium	38.0	15.3	46.7	100.0
Switzerland	36.8	23.1	40.1	100.0
Chile	28.6	35.2	36.2	100.0
In my community, people living with HIV/AIDS should be allowed to participate fully in socio-cultural activities.	26.4	41.7	31.9	100.0
Canada	23.1	37.2	39.7	100.0
Belgium	12.4	55.3	32.3	100.0
Switzerland	13.9	67.7	18.4	100.0
Chile	52.6	7.1	40.3	100.0

PLHIV: people living with HIV.

Furthermore, in terms of the levels of comfort expressed by students in relation to situations involving PLHIV/AIDS, two results stand out. First, it appears that respondents scoring 14 or higher on the HIV-KQ-18 questionnaire were proportionally more likely to be very comfortable with their child attending a school in which another student had been diagnosed with HIV/AIDS (chi-square = 33,366). Second, it appears also that respondents scoring 14 or higher on the HIV-KQ-18 scale were proportionally more likely to be very comfortable with a close friend or family member having close contact with someone diagnosed with HIV/AIDS (chi-square = 27,644). Overall, however, it must be noted that the majority of students across the four countries under study reported feeling comfortable in a variety of situations involving PLHIV/AIDS, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Students’ comfort levels in situations involving contact with PLHIV/AIDS as percentage, by country.

Statements	Uncomfortable	Comfortable	No opinion	Total
If a classmate contracts HIV/AIDS	10.2	70.6	19.2	100.0
Canada	3.8	83.4	12.8	100.0
Belgium	18.4	50.7	30.9	100.0
Switzerland	10.5	67.6	21.9	100.0
Chile	3.8	89.1	7.1	100.0
If a work colleague contracts HIV/AIDS	10.0	71.2	18.8	100.0
Canada	3.8	83.4	12.8	100.0
Belgium	17.1	52.6	30.3	100.0
Switzerland	11.0	67.6	21.4	100.0
Chile	4.3	89.1	6.6	100.0
If you discovered that the local grocer where you shop has HIV/AIDS	10.5	69.5	20.0	100.0
Canada	6.4	76.9	16.7	100.0
Belgium	17.1	45.8	37.1	100.0
Switzerland	10.4	71.5	18.1	100.0
Chile	5.2	89.6	5.2	100.0
If your child attended a school where a student had been diagnosed with HIV/AIDS	21.1	58.2	20.7	100.0
Canada	18.0	62.8	19.2	100.0
Belgium	28.2	34.3	37.5	100.0
Switzerland	25.8	55.5	18.7	100.0
Chile	11.0	83.4	5.6	100.0
If a close friend or family member had close contact with someone carrying HIV/AIDS	15.7	62.2	22.1	100.0
Canada	23.1	57.7	19.2	100.0
Belgium	17.5	44.3	38.2	100.0
Switzerland	18.8	58.6	22.6	100.0
Chile	8.5	85.3	6.2	100.0

PLHIV: people living with HIV.

Discussion

The present discussion will focus on the two major themes addressed in the ‘Results’ section, above, that is, HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and attitudes among social work students enrolled at higher learning institutions across four countries. The discussion will aim to identify participants’ social representations of the disease.

To begin, we must acknowledge that social work students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS are largely informed by the collective imagination and social representations of the disease that have been evolving worldwide since cases were first identified in the United States in the early 1980s (Labra, 2015). In the intervening decades, it seems that the spread of general knowledge about HIV/AIDS has not kept pace with the spread of the disease, a reality that is reflected in the results of this study. The median HIV-KQ-18 score of 14.0 (Carey and Schroder, 2002) achieved by study participants leads us to conclude that, overall, undergraduate university students enrolled in social work programmes in Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland possess relatively low levels of knowledge about HIV/AIDS. This result parallels that obtained by a previous study by Labra et al. (2017), in which 20.3 percent of student respondents achieved scores of ⩽13 on 18, also indicating low levels of knowledge. Similarly, a study of homosexual African-American men by Wagenaar et al. (2012) obtained comparable results.

The low levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge noted among students participating in the present study are accompanied by the finding that a majority (77.9%) considered themselves to be at low risk of infection by HIV/AIDS. How might we explain this perception of low risk, founded, as it is, in a lack of knowledge? A plausible hypothesis is that students do not assess the risk of infection realistically. Indeed, a glaring contradiction emerges from their testimonies: how can one feel protected without having the knowledge necessary to protect oneself? Do other variables lead students to perceive themselves as being at low risk of contagion? An abundant literature shows clearly that a dearth of information on HIV/AIDS correlates both with infection risks and with discriminatory practices (Labra and Dumont, 2012; Negin et al., 2015; Sumari-de Boer et al., 2012; Tulloch et al., 2012).

In terms of variables influencing low levels of knowledge on HIV/AIDS among students participating in the study, an analysis of the results shows that knowledge levels correlate with age, specifically that knowledge increases with increasing age and that, consequently, younger participants possess less knowledge. Adrien et al. (2013) had noted that knowledge about HIV/AIDS tends to be limited in younger populations. As mentioned above, levels of participants’ knowledge related to HIV/AIDS varied also by country. Across the four countries considered in the study, students in Switzerland were proportionally more likely to possess high levels of knowledge, while students in Belgium presented the lowest levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge among the participating groups. Given the links between knowledge and risk perception noted earlier, it appears that students in the Belgian sub-sample are more vulnerable to the risk of infection in comparison with Canadian, Chilean and Swiss social work students (see Table 2). In addition, the results point to a dependency relationship between the variable of socio-professional status and levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge. Specifically, among the study participants in the four countries under discussion, those who held full-time employment were more likely to possess good levels of knowledge about the disease than were those employed part-time or unemployed. The question that arises, therefore, is what is the link in the apparent correlation between full-time employment among students and their levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge, in comparison with those who work less or who do not work outside their studies? Possible answers will have to wait for further studies of variables impacting on the knowledge levels of students.

In terms of the attitudes of social work students towards the disease and towards PLHIV/AIDS, the results indicate that they are generally positive among participants scoring higher than 14 on the HIV-KQ-18 scale (Carey and Schroder, 2002). This finding suggests that social representations of HIV/AIDS have changed since the first critical years of the pandemic, specifically in that they have evolved positively, as reflected in the views of social work students. It is noteworthy, for example, that only 17.8 percent of participants across the four countries disagreed with the notion that PLHIV/AIDS should be able to work with the public in professions such as dentistry or hairdressing. This implies that the favourable attitudes of some participants are subject to the condition that PLHIV/AIDS are not perceived as exposing others to the risk of infection. This suggests, furthermore, that an essentially well-founded fear of infection nevertheless accentuates the ostracisation of PLHIV/AIDS, especially by limiting their access to various ‘hands-on’ professions in fields such as healthcare and the beauty industry, which previous research has identified as ‘socially forbidden’ for PLHIV/AIDS (Infante et al., 2006).

In addition, participants’ answers on the representations of PLHIV/AIDS in their communities suggest the continued existence of stigmatisation. In relation to the seven statements pertaining to PLHIV/AIDS in their communities on which participants were asked to give their opinion, the results show that social acceptance is not the norm. Thus, almost 40 years since cases of HIV infection were first identified (Markova and Wilkie, 1987; Schlebusch et al., 1991), negative representations of PLHIV/AIDS persist in the collective imagination, specifically those that portray infected individuals as socially marginal and deviant (Labra and Dumont, 2012). Research published in the last 20 years undoubtedly points to a positive evolution of HIV/AIDS social representations in comparison with the two preceding decades (Joffe and Bettega, 2003; Labra, 2015). Nevertheless, disdain, stigma and fear of the disease and its carriers persist within the social environments of students who participated in this study.

Persistently negative attitudes towards PLHIV/AIDS have been the subject of multiple studies (Al-Rabeei et al., 2012; Iwoi et al., 2017; Linguissi et al., 2018). It is important to underline that the results of this study show that social work students scoring higher than 14 on the HIV-KQ-18 scale (Carey and Schroder, 2002) responded favourably to the notion of sending their children to a school where another student was diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. The same sub-group communicated an openness towards PLHIV/AIDS within the social and family circle. Finally, the generally positive attitudes towards the disease and PLHIV/AIDS, as expressed by participating social work students in Belgium, Canada, Chile and Switzerland, corroborate a positive trend noted in other studies carried out over the past 5 years (Labra et al., 2017; Labra and Lacasse, 2015).

Social work and HIV/AIDS education

The results of this study raise two fundamental questions related to the education and training of social workers. First, given that social workers play a crucial role in delivering interventions to PLHIV/AIDS, how can we explain the low HIV-KQ-18 median scores, noted above, which indicate borderline low levels of knowledge about the disease (Kaplan et al., 2004; Linsk, 2011)? Part of the answer may lie in the normalisation of the disease: it is possible that an excessive confidence in HIV/AIDS prevention has led to a perceived lesser need to teach knowledge about the disease and the challenges faced by PLHIV/AIDS within existing curricula (Dubois-Arber et al., 2001). Such gaps in education and training may have highly deleterious effects on interventions delivered by future social workers, since the lack of knowledge and awareness of the realities of the disease frequently results in practices that stigmatise PLHIV/AIDS (Davtyan et al., 2017; Labra and Thomas, 2017). The research literature shows, indeed, that healthcare workers and institutions are not exempt from perpetuating various forms of stigmatisation and discrimination with regard to PLHIV/AIDS (Arrey et al., 2017; Pezeril, 2017; Wagner et al., 2016). This lack of knowledge, beyond the impact it may have on social work professionals’ capacity to empathise with PLHIV/AIDS, can also impact their know-how, notably in terms of recourse to inclusive practices. A study by Désilets (2019), for example, showed that practitioners who delivered services to women both living with HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence demonstrated sometimes low levels of knowledge of one or both of these issues, resulting in difficulties in delivering effective interventions.

The second question we must address in relation to low HIV-KQ-18 scores among social work students relates to the ethical dimensions of interventions, that is, how will future social workers be able successfully to face the ethical challenges of interventions for PLHIV/AIDS if they do not acquire adequate levels of knowledge about the disease and its realities within the course of their education (Gonin and Tellier, 2018)? This is a crucial issue. When faced with questions relating to the exclusion and stigmatisation of PLHIV/AIDS in their communities, the overwhelming majority chose not to answer, which suggests that social work students are largely unaware of the impact of discrimination on people living with the disease (Observatoire SIS Association, 2019; Pezeril, 2017; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2015). Yet interventions for PLHIV/AIDS are potentially fraught with ethical challenges, such as, for example, divulging a service recipient’s HIV positivity (Legault, 1999).

Solutions to redress these fundamental shortcomings in social work education and training must focus on three elements, namely, (1) raising awareness among both instructors and students of the realities of PLHIV/AIDS and the ongoing nature of the disease, to counteract a widespread banalisation of HIV/AIDS and the notion that it exists only elsewhere, far from one’s own community, (2) integrating HIV/AIDS into the core courses of social work curricula as an actual social problem, to provide students with ready access to knowledge on the realities of PLHIV/AIDS and (3) promoting the broadening of research into HIV/AIDS themes in social work schools, especially such dimensions as the lived realities of PLHIV/AIDS, community intervention models and ongoing student support, among others.

Conclusion

This study aimed to assess levels of knowledge and determine the attitudes of social work university students in four different countries in relation to HIV/AIDS and infected individuals. We can conclude that the variables of knowledge and attitudes examined in the present study, among 674 social work students, are improving slowly, especially in terms of the basic knowledge that can reasonably be expected of undergraduate students.

The HIV/AIDS pandemic, in particular because of its specific history, places unique responsibilities on social workers. Social representations of the disease have evolved from those of a lethal affliction towards those of a chronic condition (Labra and Lacasse, 2015). What remains to be raised is the need to include HIV/AIDS in the training of social work students. The development of biomedicine has enabled HIV/AIDS to progress from a fatal disease to a chronic disease. But the fight against the stigmatisation and exclusion occasioned by the pandemic makes social workers indispensable in their role as agents of social change and defenders of individual freedom, autonomy and self-determination for those living with the disease. Within this context, the support that social workers deliver to PLHIV/AIDS and their loved ones, especially for those in the terminal stages of the disease, plays a key role in the intervention domain. It is crucial, therefore, that social work education and training focus on systemic perspective analyses, which consider PLHIV/AIDS not in isolation, but as belonging to an environment that includes their families, social circles and communities. Social workers can thus fulfil a crucial need in PLHIV/AIDS intervention, in particular by drawing on pluridisciplinary approaches. Overall, social work education must more comprehensively incorporate HIV/AIDS themes into its curricula if we are to train professionals who are knowledgeable, committed and cognizant of the realities of PLHIV/AIDS.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Oscar Labra

Author biographies

Oscar Labra is professor at the Department of Human and Social Development, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada. His research focuses on mental health in men who have experienced natural disasters, help-seeking, and HIV/AIDS in first nations and other communities.

Augustin Ependa is professor at the Department of Human and Social Development, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada. His research focuses on regional development and HIV.

Isis Chamblas is professor at the School of Social Work, University of Concepcion, Chile. Chamblas’s research focuses on community health and older people.

Gabriel Gingras-Lacroix is a Ph.D student at the Health Sciences teaching and research unit, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada.

André Antoniadis is professor and Vice-Dean at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Faculty of Social Work (HETSL | HES-SO), Switzerland.

Cristine Biston is professor and manager of research projects at Haute école de travail social, Henallux, Belgium.

Marthe Mukeshimana is a master’s student at the Health Sciences teaching and research unit, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada.

Marie-Ève Giroux is director of the Center des R.O.S.É.S. de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Québec, Canada.

References

Adrien

Beaulieu

Leaune

Perron

Dassa

(2013) ‘Trends in Attitudes toward People Living with HIV, Homophobia, and HIV Transmission Knowledge in Quebec, Canada (1996, 2002, and 2010)’, AIDS Care 25(1): 55–65.

Agence de la santé publique du Canada (2003) Une enquête attitudinale. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Agence de la santé publique du Canada.

Agence de la santé publique du Canada (2006) Sondage 2006 sur les attitudes des Autochtones touchant le VIH/sida. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Agence de la santé publique du Canada.

Al-Rabeei

Dallak

Al-Awadi

(2012) ‘Knowledge, Attitude and Beliefs towards HIV/AIDS among Students of Health Institutes in Sana’a City’, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 18(3): 221–6.

Arrey

A.E.

Bilsen

Lacor

Deschepper

(2017) ‘Perceptions of Stigma and Discrimination in Health Care Settings towards Sub-saharan African Migrant Women Living with HIV/AIDS in Belgium: A Qualitative Study’, Journal of Biosocial Science 49(5): 578–96.

Belenko

Dembo

Copenhaver

Hiller

Swan

Garcia

C.A.

O’Connell

Oser

Pearson

Pankow

(2016) ‘HIV Stigma in Prisons and Jails: Results from a Staff Survey’, AIDS and Behavior 20(1): 71–84.

Beuthin

R.E.

Bruce

Sheilds

(2015) ‘Storylines of Aging with HIV: Shifts toward Sense Making’, Qualitative Health Research 25(5): 612–21.

Bowen

E.A.

(2013) ‘AIDS at 30: Implications for Social Work Education’, Journal of Social Work Education 49(2): 265–76.

Carey

M.P.

Schroder

K.E.E.

(2002) ‘Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire’, AIDS Education and Prevention 14(2): 172–82.

10.

Cassidy

Curran

Steenbeek

Langille

(2015) ‘University Students’ Sexual Health Knowledge: A Scoping Literature Review’, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 47(3): 18–38.

11.

Davtyan

Olshansky

E.F.

Brown

Lakon

(2017) ‘A Grounded Theory Study of HIV-Related Stigma in US-Based Health Care Settings’, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 28(6): 907–22.

12.

Désilets

(2019) ‘Analyse des besoins de formation et de sensibilisation des prestataires de services communautaires en matière de VIH et de violence exercée par un partenaire intime. (Mémoire)’, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. Available online at: https://archipel.uqam.ca/13737/1/M16454.pdf

13.

Dubois-Arber

Jeannin

Spencer

Meystre-Agustoni

Haour-Knipe

Moreau-Gruet

Benninghoff

Paccaud

(2001) ‘Prévention du VIH/sida en suisse: bilan et perspectives’, Forum Médical Suisse 1: 621–5.

14.

Geter

Herron

A.R.

Sutton

M.Y.

(2018) ‘HIV-Related Stigma by Healthcare Providers in the United States: A Systematic Review’, AIDS Patient Care and STDS 32(10): 418–24.

15.

Gonin

Tellier

(2018) ‘Formation en éthique et délibération dans le champ du travail social’, Spirale-Revue de Recherches en Education 61(1): 135–50.

16.

Goodwin

Kozlova

Nizharadze

Polyakova

(2004) ‘HIV/AIDS among Adolescents in Eastern Europe: Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, Social Representations of Risk and Sexual Activity among School Children and Homeless Adolescents in Russia, Georgia and the Ukraine’, Journal of Health Psychology 9(3): 381–96.

17.

Guthrie

J.A.

Dore

G.J.

McDonald

A.M.

Kaldor

J.M.

(2000) ‘HIV and AIDS in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: 1992-1998’, Medical Journal of Australia 172(6): 266–9.

18.

Handal

C.M.

(2017) ‘Exploration of Graduate Social Work Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes towards People Living with HIV/AIDS’, Master Thesis, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, CA.

19.

Hasse

Ledergerber

Furrer

Battegay

Hirschel

Cavassini

Bertisch

Bernasconi, R. Weber and Swiss

HIV Cohort Study (2011) ‘Morbidity and Aging in HIV-Infected Persons: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study’, Clinical Infectious Diseases 53(11): 1130–9.

20.

Hoffart

Ibrahim

G.M.

Lam

R.A.

Minty

E.P.

Theam

Schaefer

J.P.

(2012) ‘Medical Students’ Attitudes towards Treating Patients with HIV: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study’, Medical Teacher 34(3): 254.

21.

Infante

Zarco

Cuadra

S.M.

Morrison

Caballero

Bronfman

Magis

(2006) ‘HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination: The Case of Health Care Providers in Mexico’, Salud Publica de Mexico 48(2): 141–50.

22.

Iwoi

D.M.W.

Nde

P.F.

Yuh

Kwenti

E.T.

Tshimwanga

E.K.

Achiri

D.T.

Djunda

K.E.

(2017) ‘Assessment of the Level of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice with Regard to Care of People Living with HIV/AIDS among Nursing and Midwifery Students in Fako, Cameroon’, World Journal of AIDS 7(1): 1–15.

23.

Jaworsky

Gardner

Thorne

J.G.

Sharma

McNaughton

Paddock

Chew

Lees

Makuwaza

Wagner

Rachlis

CHIME Research Group (2017) ‘The Role of People Living with HIV as Patient Instructors–Reducing Stigma and Improving Interest around HIV Care among Medical Students’, AIDS Care 29(4): 524–31.

24.

Joffe

H.l.n

Bettega

(2003) ‘Social Representation of AIDS among Zambian Adolescents’, Journal of Health Psychology 8(5): 616–31.

25.

Kaplan

L.E.

Tomaszewski

Gorin

(2004) ‘Current Trends and the Future of HIV/AIDS Services: A Social Work Perspective’, Health & Social Work 29(2): 153–60.

26.

Koob

J.J.

Harvan

J.S.

(2003) ‘AIDS Instruction in US Schools of Social Work: 20 Years into the Epidemic’, Social Work Education 22(3): 309–19.

27.

Labra

(2015) ‘Social Representations of HIV/AIDS in Mass Media: Some Important Lessons for Caregivers’, International Social Work 58(2): 238–48.

28.

Labra

Dumont

(2012) ‘Representaciones sociales del VIH-SIDA en la Región del Maule, Chile’, Revista Trabajo Social 83: 35–40.

29.

Labra

Lacasse

(2015) ‘Représentations sociales du VIH/sida chez les étudiants de niveau universitaire d’une région éloignée du Québec’, Canadian Social Work Review/Revue canadienne de service social 32(1–2): 167–86.

30.

Labra

Thomas

(2017) ‘The Persistence of Stigma Linked with HIV/AIDS in Health-Care Contexts: A Chronic Social Incapacity’, in Dumais

(ed.) HIV/AIDS: Contemporary Challenges, pp. 125–39. London: IntechOpen.

31.

Labra

Lacasse

Gingras-Lacroix

(2017) ‘Attitudes et connaissances d’étudiants universitaires à l’égard du VIH-sida’, Service Social 63(2): 1–20.

32.

Larmarange

(2020) ‘Hommes ayant des rapports sexuels avec d’autres hommes (HSH): une épidémie toujours active–Joseph Larmarange’, Transcriptases / ANRS Information 129. Available online at: https://www.pistes.fr/transcriptases/129_549.htm

33.

Legault

G.A.

(1999) Professionnalisme et délibération éthique: Manuel d’aide à la décision responsible. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

34.

Linguissi

L.S.G.

Yombi

R.N.O.

Nkenfou

C.N.

Ibara

J.R.

(2018) ‘Knowledge on HIV/AIDS among Students of the Faculty of Health Sciences, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo’, American Journal of Epidemiology 6(1): 7–13.

35.

Linsk

N.L.

(2011) ‘Thirty Years into the HIV Epidemic: Social Work Perspectives and Prospects’, Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services 10(3): 218–29.

36.

Logie

C.H.

Lacombe-Duncan

Wang

Kaida

Conway

Webster

de Pokomandy

Loutfy

M.R.

Anema

Becker

Brotto

Carter

Cardinal

Colley

Ding

Duddy

Gataric

Hogg

R.S.

Hosward

Jabbari

Jones

Kestler

Langlois

Lima

Lloyd-Smith

Medjuck

Miller

Money

Nicholson

Ogilvie

Patterson

Pick

Roth

Salters

Sanchez

Sas

Sereda

Summers

Tom

Wang

Webster

Zhang

Abdul-Noor

Angel

Barry

Bauer

Beaver

Benoit

Bertozzi

Borton

Bourque

Brophy

Burchell

Carlson

Cioppa

Cohen

Conway

Cooper

Cotnam

Cousineau

Fraleigh

Gagnier

Gasingirwa

Greene

Hart

Islam

Kaushic

Kennedy

Kerr

Kiboyogo

Kwaramba

Leonard

Lewis

Logie

Margolese

Muchenje

Ndung’u

O’Brien

Ouellette

Powis

Quan

Raboud

Rachlis

Ralph

Rourke

Rueda

Sandre

Smaill

Smith

Tigere

Tharao

Walmsley

Wobeser

Yee

Yudin

Baril

J.-G.

Burke

N.B.

Clément

Dayle

Dubuc

Fernet

Groleau

Hot

Klein

Martin

Massie

Ménard

O’Brien

Otis

Peltier

Pierre

Proulx-Boucher

Rouleau

Savoie

É.

Tremblay

Trottier

Tsoukas

Gahagan

Hankins

Masching

Ogunnaike-Cooke

(2018) ‘Pathways from HIV-Related Stigma to Antiretroviral Therapy Measures in the HIV Care Cascade for Women Living with HIV in Canada’, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999) 77(2): 144–53.

37.

Maimaiti

Shamsuddin

Abdurahim

Tohti

Memet

(2010) ‘Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding HIV/AIDS among University Students in Xinjiang’, Global Journal of Health Science 2(2): 51–60.

38.

Markova

Wilkie

(1987) ‘Representations, Concepts and Social Change: The Phenomenon of AIDS’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17(4): 389–409.

39.

Natale

A.P.

Biswas

Urada

Scheyett

A.M.

(2010) ‘Global HIV and AIDS: Calling All Social Work Educators’, Social Work Education 29(1): 27–47.

40.

Negin

Aspin

Gadsden

Reading

(2015) ‘HIV among Indigenous Peoples: A Review of the Literature on HIV-Related Behaviour since the Beginning of the Epidemic’, AIDS and Behavior 19(9): 1720–34.

41.

Observatoire SIS Association (2019) ‘Discriminations: le stigmate du VIH demeure’. Available online at: https://www.sida-info-service.org/6eme-enquete-sur-les-discriminations-le-stigmate-du-vih-demeure/

42.

Pezeril

(2017) ‘La sérophobie en actes. Analyse des signalements pour discrimination liée au VIH/sida déposées chez Unia (2003-2014)’. Available online at: https://www.observatoire-sidasexualites.be/rapport-serophobie-2017/

43.

Public Health Agency of Canada (2015) ‘Rapport d’étape sur le VIH/sida et les populations distinctes: Personnes vivant avec le VIH/sida – Données probantes sur les déterminants sociaux de la santé affectant les personnes vivant avec le VIH/sida’. Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/fr/sante-publique/services/vih-sida/publications/rapports-etape-vih-sida-populations-distinctes/personnes-vivant-avec-vih-sida/chapitre-4-donnees-probantes-determinants-sociaux-sante-affectant-personnes-vivant-avec-hiv-sida.html#a4-4-1

44.

Rowan

Shears

(2011) ‘HIV/AIDS Course Content in CSWE-Accredited Social Work Programs: A Survey of Current Curricular Practices’, Journal of Teaching in Social Work 31(2): 119–30.

45.

Sacramento

(2015) ‘Le travail social et le sida: bref aperçu de quelques axes d’intervention’ in VI Congresso Internacional da AIFRIS, Porto, 7–10 July.

46.

Schlebusch

Bedford

Bosch

B.A.

du Preez

M.R.

(1991) ‘Health Care Professionals’ Knowledge about AIDS, Prejudice and Attitudes Towards AIDS’, South African Journal of Psychology 21(4): 247–54.

47.

Stowers Johansen

Kohli

(2012) ‘Long-Term HIV/AIDS Survivors: Coping Strategies and Challenges’, Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services 11(1): 6–22.

48.

Stringer

K.L.

Turan

McCormick

Durojaiye

Nyblade

Kempf

M.-C.

Lichtenstein

Turan

J.M.

(2016) ‘HIV-Related Stigma among Healthcare Providers in the Deep South’, AIDS and Behavior 20(1): 115–25.

49.

Sumari-de Boer

I.M.

Sprangers

M.A.

Prins

J.M.

Nieuwkerk

P.T.

(2012) ‘HIV Stigma and Depressive Symptoms Are Related to Adherence and Virological Response to Antiretroviral Treatment among Immigrant and Indigenous HIV Infected Patients’, AIDS and Behavior 16(6): 1681–9.

50.

Tulloch

H.E.

Balfour

Kowal

Tasca

G.A.

Angel

J.B.

Garber

Macpherson

Cooper

Cameron

D.W.

(2012) ‘HIV Knowledge among Canadian-Born and Sub-Saharan African-Born Patients Living with HIV’, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 14(1): 132–9.

51.

Tung

W.-C.

Cook

D.M.

(2013) ‘HIV/AIDS Knowledge and Attitudes among Chinese College Students in the US’, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 15(4): 788–95.

52.

Vandebroek

Reyes-García

de Albuquerque

U.P.

Bussmann

Pieroni

(2011) ‘Local Knowledge: Who Cares?’, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7: 35.

53.

Wagenaar

B.H.

Sullivan

P.S.

Stephenson

(2012) ‘HIV Knowledge and Associated Factors among Internet-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in South Africa and the United States’, PLoS ONE 7(3): e32915.

54.

Wagner

A.C.

McShane

K.E.

Hart

T.A.

Margolese

(2016) ‘A Focus Group Qualitative Study of HIV Stigma in the Canadian Healthcare System’, The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality 25(1): 61–71.

55.

Wolf

M.S.

Mitchell

C.G.

(2002) ‘Preparing Social Workers to Address HIV/AIDS Prevention and Detection: Implications for Professional Training and Education’, Journal of Community Health 27(3): 165–80.

56.

Wolfe

Carrieri

M.P.

Shepard

(2010) ‘Treatment and Care for Injecting Drug Users with HIV Infection: A Review of Barriers and Ways Forward’, The Lancet 376(9738): 355–66.

HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes among social work students: A comparative study

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

Data analysis

Results

Discussion

Social work and HIV/AIDS education

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Author biographies

References