Socioeconomic development initiatives (SDIs) have become a controversial issue. In giving skill trainings and credit supports, practitioners assume that SDI participation will enhance women’s income/dignity. Some studies have indicated that SDIs reduce women’s exposure to marital violence (MV), while others have shown that they increase spousal conflicts/MV. Our study explains how SDI participation may influence women’s marital life. This explorative study adopted a grounded theory design. Data included 17 participating-women’s interviews. It revealed that many women experienced further marital subordination, spousal conflicts, and MV. Yet women with strong motivation increased marital dignity/safety. Caring husbands facilitated this. If men can be involved in supporting women, impacts of SDIs will be substantial.
AhmedS.M.ChowdhuryM.BhuiyaA. (2001) ‘Microcredit and Emotional Well-Being: Experience of Poor Rural Women from Matlab, Bangladesh’, World Development29: 1957–66.
2.
AhmedS.M.PetzoldM.KabirZ.N.TomsonG. (2006) ‘Targeted Intervention for the Ultra Poor in Rural Bangladesh: Does It Make Any Difference in Their Health-Seeking Behaviour?’Social Science & Medicine63: 2899–911.
3.
Al-ShamiS.S.A.MajidI.MohamadM.R., et al. (2017) ‘Household Welfare and Women Empowerment through Microcredit Financing: Evidence from Malaysia Microcredit’, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment27: 894–910.
4.
AngelucciM. (2008) ‘Love on the Rocks: Domestic Violence and Alcohol Abuse in Rural Mexico’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy8: Article 43.
5.
Ashraf AliH.M. (2014) ‘Microcredit and Power: Examining How and Why Women Encounter Domination in Bangladesh’, Development in Practice24: 327–38.
6.
AtkinsonM.P.GreensteinT.N.LangM.M. (2005) ‘For Women, Breadwinning Can Be Dangerous: Gendered Resource Theory and Wife Abuse’, Journal of Marriage and Family67: 1137–48.
7.
BadenS.GreenC.GoetzA.M., et al. (1994) Background Report on Gender Issues in Bangladesh (BRIDGE [Development–Gender]). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
8.
BajracharyaA.AminS. (2013) ‘Microcredit and Domestic Violence in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Selection Bias Influences’, Demography50: 1819–43.
9.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and Statistics and Informative Division (SID) (2016) Report on Violence Against Women (VAW) Survey 2015. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
10.
CampbellC.MannellJ. (2016) ‘Conceptualising the Agency of Highly Marginalised Women: Intimate Partner Violence in Extreme Settings’, Gobal Public Health11: 1–16.
11.
CharmazK. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE.
12.
CharmazK. (2017) ‘Constructivist Grounded Theory’, The Journal of Positive Psychology12: 299–300.
13.
CoyneI.T. (1997) ‘Sampling in Qualitative Research. Purposeful and Theoretical Sampling: Merging or Clear Boundaries?’Journal of Advanced Nursing26: 623–30.
14.
CreswellJ.W. (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London: SAGE.
15.
CreswellJ.W. (2012) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
16.
DahlgrenL.EmmelinM.WinkvistA. (2007) Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health. Umea: Umea University.
17.
Department of Social Services (DSS) (2011) Implementation Manual of Rural Social Services Programme. Dhaka: Department of Social Services (DSS), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
18.
Department of Social Services (DSS) (2020) Rural Mother Centre. Available online at: http://www.dss.gov.bd/ (accessed 28 September 2020).
19.
DineenK.LeQ.V. (2015) ‘The Impact of an Integrated Microcredit Program on the Empowerment of Women and Gender Equality in Rural Vietnam’, Journal of Developing Areas49: 23–38.
20.
EnloeC. (2015) ‘Closing Reflection: Militiamen Get Paid; Women Borrowers Get Beaten’, Politics & Gender11: 435–8.
21.
GalabS.RaoN.C. (2003) ‘Women’s Self-Help Groups, Poverty Alleviation and Empowerment’, Economic and Political Weekly38: 1274–83.
22.
GanleJ.K.AfriyieK.SegbefiaA.Y. (2015) ‘Microcredit: Empowerment and Disempowerment of Rural Women in Ghana’, World Development66: 335–45.
23.
GoetzA.M.GuptaR.S. (1996) ‘Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power, and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh’, World Development24: 45–63.
24.
HadiA. (2005) ‘Women’s Productive Role and Marital Violence in Bangladesh’, Journal of Family Violence20: 181–9.
25.
HamadR.FernaldL.C.H. (2015) ‘Microcredit Participation and Women’s Health: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Peru’, International Journal for Equity in Health14: 62.
26.
HashemiS.M.SchulerS.R.RileyA.P. (1996) ‘Rural Credit Programs and Women’s Empowerment in Bangladesh’, World Development24: 635–53.
27.
HeiseL. (1998) ‘Violence Against Women: An Integrated Ecological Framework’, Violence Against Women4: 262–90.
28.
HippertC. (2011) ‘Women’s Spaces, Gender Mainstreaming, and Development Priorities: Popular Participation as Gendered Work in Rural Bolivia’, Women’s Studies International Forum34: 498–508.
29.
JesminS. (2017) ‘Social Determinants of Married Women’s Attitudinal Acceptance of Intimate Partner Violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence32: 3226–44.
30.
KabeerN. (1990) ‘Poverty, Purdah and Women’s Survival Strategies in Rural Bangladesh’, in BernsteinH.CrowB.MackintoshM., et al. (eds) The Food Question: Profit Versus People?, pp. 134–47. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
31.
KabeerN. (2001) ‘Conflicts Over Credit: Re-Evaluating the Empowerment Potential of Loans to Women in Rural Bangladesh’, World Development29: 63–84.
32.
KabirM.S.HuoX. (2011) ‘Advancement of Rural Poor Women through Small Entrepreneurship Development: The Case of Bangladesh’, International Journal of Business and Management6: 134–40.
33.
KaiserS.AminS.N.GanepolaV., et al. (2015) Men’s Perceptions of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: Evidence from Four South Asian Countries. Available online at: http://repository.usp.ac.fj/8962/ (accessed 24 September 2016).
34.
KarimR.LawC.K. (2013) ‘Gender Ideology, Microcredit Participation and Women’s Status in Rural Bangladesh’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy33: 45–62.
35.
KarimR.LawC.K. (2016) ‘Microcredit and Marital Violence: Moderating Effects of Husbands’ Gender Ideology’, Journal of Family Violence31: 227–38.
36.
KarimR.EmmelinM.LindbergL., et al. (2016) ‘Gender and Women Development Initiatives in Bangladesh: A Study of Rural Mother Center’, Social Work in Public Health31: 369–86.
37.
KarimR.LindbergL.WamalaS., et al. (2018) ‘Men’s Perceptions of Women’s Participation in Development Initiatives in Rural Bangladesh’, American Journal of Men’s Health12: 398–410.
38.
KimJ.C.WattsC.H.HargreavesJ.R., et al. (2007) ‘Understanding the Impact of a Microfinance-Based Intervention on Women’s Empowerment and the Reduction of Intimate Partner Violence in South Africa’, American Journal of Public Health97: 17949–1802.
39.
KrishnanS. (2005) ‘Gender, Caste, and Economic Inequalities and Marital Violence in Rural South India’, Health Care for Women International26: 87–99.
40.
KumariK.B.V. (2011) Microcredit as a Poverty Alleviation Strategy, Women’s Empowerment and Gender Relations (Women’s and Gender Studies). New Brunswick, NJ: The State University of New Jersey.
41.
LeachF.SitaramS. (2002) ‘Microfinance and Women’s Empowerment: A Lesson from India’, Development in Practice12: 575–88.
42.
LiuL.MacPhailF.DongX.-Y. (2018) ‘Gender, Work Burden, and Mental Health in Post-Reform China’, Feminist Economics24: 194–217.
43.
LyonS.MutersbaughT.WorthenH. (2017) ‘The Triple Burden: The Impact of Time Poverty on Women’s Participation in Coffee Producer Organizational Governance in Mexico’, Agriculture and Human Values34: 317–31.
44.
MadhaniaF.I.TompkinsaC.JackaS.M., et al. (2015) ‘Participation in Micro-Finance Programmes and Women’s Mental Health in South Asia: A Modified Systematic Review’, The Journal of Development Studies51: 1255–70.
45.
MayouxL. (1998) ‘Research Round-Up Women’s Empowerment and Micro-Finance Programmes: Strategies for Increasing Impact’, Development in Practice8: 235–41.
46.
MoserC.O.N. (1993) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. Abingdon: Routledge.
47.
MurshidN.S. (2016) ‘Microfinance Participation, Control over Resources, and Justification of IPV: Results from a Nationally Representative Sample of Women’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence34: 475–95.
48.
NaharS.BanuM.NasreenH.E. (2011) ‘Women-Focused Development Intervention Reduces Delays in Accessing Emergency Obstetric Care in Urban Slums in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study’, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth11: 11.
49.
RahmanA. (1999) ‘Micro-Credit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays?’, World Development27: 67–82.
50.
RahmanM.HoqueM.A.MakinodaS. (2011) ‘Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Is Women Empowerment a Reducing Factor? A Study from a National Bangladeshi Sample’, Journal of Family Violence26: 411–20.
51.
ReidC.LedrewR.A. (2013) ‘The Burden of Being “Employable”’, Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work28: 79–93.
52.
SchulerS.R.LenziR.NazneenS., et al. (2013) ‘Perceived Decline in Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Bangladesh: Qualitative Evidence’, Studies in Family Planning44: 243–57.
53.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2019) Human Development Report 2019. New York: UNDP.
54.
Vonderlack-NavarroR. (2010) ‘Targeting Women versus Addressing Gender in Microcredit: Lessons from Honduras’, Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work25: 123–34.
55.
WhiteheadA. (1999) ‘Lazy Men’, Time-Use, and Rural Development in Zambia’, Gender & Development7: 49–61.
YountK.M.MiedemaS.S.MartinC.C., et al. (2016) ‘Men’s Coercive Control, Partner Violence Perpetration, and Life Satisfaction in Bangladesh’, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research74: 450–63.
