In this article, we discuss the question of why only a few men decide to study social science courses such as social work. While the conceptual base of our analysis includes the theory of planned behaviour and theories centring on gender role orientations, the empirical base is a random cluster sample of high-school graduates in Switzerland. The results show different gender effects, as well as direct and indirect effects, for all the theory of planned behaviour factors. Gender role orientations and the question of how a social science profession fits one’s own gender identity appear to be of particular importance only among male students.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2000) ‘Habits as Knowledge Structures: Automaticity in Goal-Directed Behaviour’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78: 53–63.
2.
AeschlimannB.HerzogW.MakarovaE. (2015) ‘Frauen in MINT-Berufen: Retrospektive Wahrnehmung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts auf der Sekundarstufe I’, Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung5: 37–49.
3.
AjzenI. (2002) ‘Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology32: 665–83.
4.
ArnoldJ.Loan-ClarkeJ.CoombsC.WilkinsonA.ParkJ.PrestonD. (2006) ‘How Well Can the Theory of Planned Behavior Account for Occupational Intentions?’, Journal of Vocational Behavior69: 374–90.
5.
BeckerR.HaunbergerS.SchubertF. (2010) ‘Studienfachwahl als Spezialfall der Ausbildungsentscheidung und Berufswahl’, Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung42: 292–310.
6.
Bieri-BuschorC.BergwegerS.FreiA.K.KapplerC. (2014) Geschlechts(un)typische Studienwahl: Weshalb Frauen Ingenieurwissenschaften studieren und Männer Primarlehrer werden. Zürich: Projektbericht Pädagogische Hochschule Zürich (PHZ).
7.
BuchmannM.KriesiI. (2009) ‘Escaping the Gender Trap: Young Women’s Transition into Non-Traditional Occupations’, in SchoonI.SilbereisenR.K. (eds) Transition from School to Work: Globalisation, Individualisation, and Patterns of Diversity, pp. 193–215. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BuchmannM.KriesiI. (2012) ‘Geschlechtstypische Berufswahl: Begabungszuschreibungen, Aspirationen und Institutionen’, in BeckerR.SolgaH. (eds) Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Sonderheft 52 der KZfSS, pp. 256–80. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
9.
BuddeJ.BöhmM.WillemsK. (2009a) ‘Wissen, Image und Erfahrungen mit Sozialer Arbeit – relevante Faktoren für die Berufswahl junger Männer?’ Zeitschrift Für Sozialpädagogik7: 264–83.
10.
BuddeJ.WillemsK.BöhmM. (2009b) ‘Ich finde das gehört einfach zum Leben dazu, anderen Leuten zu helfen. Positionierungen junger Männer zu Berufsfeldern Sozialer Arbeit’, in BuddeJ.WillemsK. (eds) Bildung als sozialer Prozess, pp. 193–210. Weinheim: Juventa.
11.
CanoJ.A.TabaresA.AlvarezC. (2016) ‘University Students’ Career Choice Intentions’, Espacios38: 20.
12.
CechE.RubineauB.SilbeyS.SeronC. (2011) ‘Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering’, American Sociological Review76: 641–66.
13.
CharlesM.BradleyK. (2009) ‘Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries’, American Journal of Sociology114: 924–76.
14.
ChristieA.CamplingJ. (2001) Men and Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
ChristieA.KrukE. (1998) ‘Choosing to Become a Social Worker: Motives, Incentives, Concerns and Disincentives’, Social Work Education17: 21–34.
CorrellS.J. (2004) ‘Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations’, American Sociological Review69: 93–113.
18.
CsikaiE.L.RozenskyC. (1997) ‘Social Work Idealism and Students’ Perceived Reasons for Entering Social Work’, Journal of Social Work Education33: 529–38.
19.
DennisonS.PooleJ.QaqishB. (2007) ‘Students’ Perceptions of Social Work’, Social Work52: 350–60.
20.
European Commission’s Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE) (2009) Gender Segregation in the Labour Market: Root Causes, Implications and Policy Responses in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
21.
EversA.SieverdingM. (2015) ‘Academic Career Intention Beyond the PhD: Can the Theory of Planned Behavior Explain Gender Differences?’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology45: 158–72.
22.
Federal Statistical Office (FSO) (2011) Frauen und Männer an den Schweizer Hochschulen. Indikatoren zu geschlechtsspezifischen Unterschieden. Neuchâtel: FSO.
23.
Federal Statistical Office (FSO) (2017) Studien- und Lebensbedingungen an den Schweizer Hochschulen. Hauptbericht der Erhebung 2016 zur sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Lage der Studierenden. Neuchâtel: FSO.
24.
FromeP.M.AlfeldC.J.EcclesJ.S.BarberB.L. (2006) ‘Why Don’t They Want a Male-Dominated Job? An Investigation of Young Women Who Changed Their Occupational Aspirations’, Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice12: 359–72.
25.
FurnessS. (2012) ‘Gender at Work: Characteristics of ‘Failing’ Social Work Students’, British Journal of Social Work42: 480–99.
26.
GeorgW. (2005) ‘Studienfachwahl: Soziale Reproduktion Oder Fachkulturelle Entscheidung’, ZA-Information57: 61–82.
27.
GianettoniL.ArrudaC.C.GauthierJ.A.JoyeD. (2015) Berufswünsche der Jugendlichen in der Schweiz: stereotype Rollenbilder und die Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf (Social Change in Switzerland N 3). Lausanne: Universität Lausanne.
28.
GilesM.LarmourS. (2000) ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Conceptual Framework to View the Career Development of Women’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology30: 2137–57.
29.
GottfredsonL.S. (2002) ‘Gottfredson’s Theory of Circumscription, Compromise, and Self-Creation’, in BrownD. (ed.) Career Choice and Development, pp. 85–148. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
GrafU.SchmidG.KnillT.StiehlerS. (2015) Männer in der Sozialen Arbeit – Schweizer Einblicke. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
31.
HadjarA.AeschlimannB. (2015) ‘Gender Stereotypes and Gendered Vocational Aspirations Among Swiss Secondary School Students’, Educational Research57: 22–42.
32.
HellB.WetzelE.PäßllerK. (2013) Verb-Interessenstest (VIT). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
33.
JonesC.A.VelaE.VangT.J.WaldenB.D. (2006) ‘Perceptions of Social Work: Undergraduate Students Assess the Profession’, The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work12: 1–12.
34.
KhunouG.PillayR.NethonondaA. (2012) ‘Social Work Is “Women’s Work”: An Analysis of Social Work Students’ Perceptions of Gender as a Career Choice Determinant’, The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher24: 120–35.
35.
Kim-SoonN.AhmadA.R.IbrahimN.N.(2016) ‘Theory of Planned Behavior: Undergraduates’ Entrepreneurial Motivation and Entrepreneurship Career Intention at a Public University’, Journal of Entrepreneurship: Research & Practice2016: 792385 (14 pp.).
36.
KleinU.Wulf-SchnabelJ. (2007) ‘Männer auf dem Weg aus der Sozialen Arbeit’, WSI Mitteilungen3: 138–44.
37.
KnillT. (2012) ‘Hintergründe des geringen Fachmänneranteils in Berufen Sozialer Arbeit’, Master’s Thesis, Fachhochschule St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
38.
LabraO.BergheulS.TurcotteP. (2017) ‘Men Studying ‘female’ Professions in Québec’, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies12: 41–52.
39.
LabraO.ChamblasI.TurcotteP.DubéN. (2018) ‘Is It a Man’s World? An Exploratory Study of Male Students in Social Work: Experiences From Chile’, British Journal of Social Work48: 769–86.
40.
LeemannR.J.KeckA. (2005) Der Übergang von der Ausbildung in den Beruf. Die Bedeutung von Qualifikation, Generation und Geschlecht. Neuchâtel: FSO.
41.
LeungS.A. (2008) ‘The Big-Five Career Theories’, in AthanasouJ.A.EsbroeckR. (eds) International Handbook of Career Guidance, pp. 115–32. Dordrecht: Springer.
42.
LeuzeK.StraußS. (2016) ‘Why Do Occupations Dominated by Women Pay Less? How “Female-Typical” Work Tasks and Working-Time Arrangements Affect the Gender Wage Gap Among Higher Education Graduates’, Work, Employment and Society30: 802–20.
43.
LörzM. (2012) ‘Mechanismen Sozialer Ungleichheit Beim Übergang Ins Studium’, in BeckerR.SolgaH. (eds) Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Sonderheft 52 der KZfFSS, pp. 302–24. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
44.
LörzM.SchindlerS.WalterJ.G. (2011) ‘Gender Inequalities in Higher Education: Extent, Development and Mechanisms of Gender Differences in Enrolment and Field of Study Choice’, Irish Educational Studies30(2): 179–98.
45.
MakarovaE.HerzogW. (2013) Geschlechtersegregation bei der Berufs- und Studienwahl von Jugendlichen. Münster: Waxmann.
46.
MakarovaE.HerzogW. (2014) ‘Gender-Atypical Career Choices of Young Women: Must the Role Model Be Female?’ Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Der Erziehung Und Sozialisation34: 38–54.
47.
MakarovaE.HerzogW.IgnaceswskaJ.AeschlimannB. (2012) Geschlechtsuntypische Berufs- und Studienwahlen bei jungen Frauen (Forschungsbericht Nr. 42). Bern: Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften.
48.
MillarR.ShevlinM. (2003) ‘Predicting Career Information-Seeking Behavior of School Pupils Using the Theory of Planned Behavior’, Journal of Vocational Behavior62: 26–42.
49.
MisenerE.K. (2001) The Image of Social Work in US, UK, and Canadian Newspapers. Albany, GA: Albany State University.
50.
MuthénL.K.MuthénB.O. (2017) Mplus User’s Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
51.
NautaM.M. (2010) ‘The Development, Evolution, and Status of Holland’s Theory of Vocational Personalities: Reflections and Future Directions for Counseling Psychology’, Journal of Counseling Psychology57: 11–22.
52.
O’NeilJ.M. (2008) ‘Using the Gender Role Conflict Scale: New Research Paradigms. Summarizing 25 Years of Research on Men’s Gender Role Conflict and Clinical Implications’, The Counseling Psychologist36: 358–445.
53.
PresleyA.Damron-MartinezD.ZhangL. (2010) ‘A Study of Business Student Choice to Study Abroad: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior’, Journal of Teaching in International Business21: 227–47.
54.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB.GrodskyE.MullerC. (2012) ‘The More Things Change, the More they Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry into STEM College Majors Over Time’, American Educational Research Journal49: 1048–73.
55.
RompfE.L.RoyseD. (1994) ‘Choice of Social Work as a Career: Possible Influences’, Journal of Social Work Education30: 163–71.
56.
SchwiterK.Hupka-BrunnerS.HuberE.KanjiS.MaihoferA.BergmanM.M. (2014) ‘Warum sind Pflegefachmänner und Elektrikerinnen nach wie vor selten? Geschlechtersegregation n Ausbildungs- und Berufsverläufen junger Erwachsener in der Schweiz’, Swiss Journal of Sociology40: 401–28.
57.
SheeranP. (2003) ‘Mediator of Moderators: Temporal Stability of Intention and the Intention-Behavior Relations’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29: 205–15.
58.
SmithJ.R.TerryD.J.MansteadA.S.LouisW.R.KottermanD.WolfsJ. (2008) ‘The Attitude-Behavior Relationship in Consumer Conduct: The Role of Norms, Past Behavior, and Self-Identity’, The Journal of Social Psychology148: 311–34.
59.
SolgaH.PfahlL. (2009) Wer mehr Ingenieurinnen will, muss bessere Karrierechancen für Frauen in Technikberufen schaffen. Berlin: WZB.
60.
SomechA.Drach-ZahavyA.(2016) ‘Gender Role Ideology’, The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss205 (accessed 19 June 2019).
61.
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (SBFI) (2017) Frauen und Männer an Schweizer Hochschulen: Indikatoren zur Chancengleichheit in Studium und wissenschaftlicher Laufbahn. Bern: SBFI.
62.
StögerH.ZieglerA.HeilemannM. (2012) Mädchen und Frauen in MINT: Bedingungen von Geschlechtsunterschieden und Interventionsmöglichkeiten. Münster: LIT Verlag.
63.
SutterN.PaulsonS. (2016) ‘Predicting College Students’ Intention to Graduate: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, College Student Journal50: 409–42.
64.
TaylorR.C. (2015) ‘Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Understand Students’ Subject Choices in Post-Compulsory Education’, Research Papers in Education30: 214–31.
65.
TowerK. (2000) ‘In Our Own Image: Shaping Attitudes about Social Work through Television Production’, Journal of Social Work Education36: 575–86.
66.
Vocational Guidance (2017) ‘Bachelor-Studienrichtungen an Den Schweizer Hochschulen’. Available online at: https://berufsberatung.ch/dyn/show/2468 (accessed 19 June 2019).
67.
WardeB. (2009) ‘Why Social Work, and What Does the Future Hold? The Narratives of Recently Graduated Hispanic and African-American Male BSW and MSW Students’, Journal of Ethic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work18: 129–45.
68.
WattH.M.G. (2008) ‘What Motivates Females and Males to Pursue Sex-Stereotyped Careers?’ in WattH.M.G.EcclesJ.S. (eds) Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences, pp. 87–113. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
69.
WettsteinE.GononP. (2009) Berufsbildung in der Schweiz. Bern: Hep Verlag.
70.
ZwickM.M.RennO. (2000) Die Attraktivität von technischen und ingenieuerwissenschaftlichen Fächern bei der Studien- und Berufswahl junger Frauen und Männer. Stuttgart: Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg.
