This article describes the Spanish-language translation and cross-cultural validation of two scales – Human Rights Engagement in Social Work and Human Rights Exposure in Social Work. These scales, measuring human rights awareness and commitment among social workers, were first validated in the United States. In this study, the scales were translated and adapted for the Spanish political and cultural context, and then validated in a sample of 498 social work students at three universities in Spain. The process produced two valid and reliable Spanish-language measures to explore human rights awareness and commitment in social work.
AbellN.SpringerD.W.KamataA. (2009) Developing and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Barrio-CantalejoI.Simón-LordaP.MelguizoM.EscalonaI.MarijuánM.HernandoP. (2008) ‘Validación de la Escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes’, Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra31(2): 135–52.
3.
BelartV.F. (2004) ‘La legibilidad: Un factor fundamental para comprender un texto’, Atención Primaria34(3): 143–6.
4.
Centre for Human Rights (1994) Human Rights and Social Work: A Manual for Schools of Social Work and the Social Work Profession. Geneva: United Nations.
5.
ChaE.S.KimK.H.ErlenJ.A. (2007) ‘Translation of Scales in Cross-Cultural Research: Issues and Techniques’, Journal of Advanced Nursing58(4): 386–95.
6.
ChenH.TungY.TangI. (2015) ‘Teaching About Human Rights in a Social Work Undergraduate Curriculum: The Taiwan Experience’, British Journal of Social Work45(8): 2335–50.
7.
ChenH.Y.TangI.C. (2017) ‘Social Workers’ Attitudes Toward Human Rights in a Sample from Taiwan’, International Social Work. Epub ahead of print 14August. DOI: 10.1177/0020872817725138.
8.
CohrsJ.C.MaesJ.MoschnerB.KielmanS. (2007) ‘Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives’, Political Psychology28: 441–70.
9.
Cubillos-VegaC. (2017) ‘Análisis de la producción científica sobre Derechos Humanos en Trabajo Social en perspectiva internacional (2000–2015)’, Revista Española De Documentación Científica40(1): 1–10.
10.
Diaz-VeizadesJ.WidamanK.LittleT.GibbsK. (1995) ‘The Measurement and Structure of Human Rights Attitudes’, The Journal of Social Psychology135: 313–28.
11.
Equipo Barañí (2001) Proyecto Barañí: Mujeres Gitanas y Sistema Penal. Madrid: Metyel.
12.
FerránM. (2001) SPSS para Windows, Análisis estadístico. Madrid: McGraw Hill Education.
JacksonD.L. (2003) ‘Revisiting Sample Size and Number of Parameter Estimates: Some Support for the N:q Hypothesis’, Structural Equation Modeling10(1): 128–41.
21.
KahnJ.H. (2006) ‘Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training and Practice: Principles, Advances, and Applications’, Counseling Psychologist34(5): 684–718.
22.
KwonI.LeeJ.MilanovicE.MacomberC. (2017) ‘Human Rights and Civic Engagement among University Students in the United States’, in Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, 19–22 October.
23.
LewisM.P.SimonsG.F.FennigC.H (2016) ‘Ethnologue: Languages of the World’. Available online at: http://www.ethnologue.com (accessed 22 November 2016)
24.
MacCallumR.C.WidamanK.F.ZhangS.HongS. (1999) ‘Sample Size in Factor Analysis’, Psychological Methods4: 84–99.
25.
McFarlandS.MathewsM. (2005) ‘Who Cares About Human Rights?’Political Psychology26(3): 365–85.
26.
McPhersonJ. (2015) ‘Human Rights Practice in Social Work: A U.S. Social Worker Looks to Brazil for Leadership’, European Journal of Social Work18: 599–612.
27.
McPhersonJ.AbellN. (2012) ‘Human Rights Engagement and Exposure: New Scales to Challenge Social Work Education’, Research on Social Work Practice22(6): 704–13.
28.
McPhersonJ.CheathamL.P. (2015) ‘One Million Bones: Measuring the Effect of Human Rights Participation in the Social Work Classroom’, Journal of Social Work Education51(1): 47–57.
29.
McPhersonJ.SiebertC.F.SiebertD.C. (2017) ‘Measuring Rights-Based Perspectives: A Validation of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work Scale’, Journal of the Society for Social Work Research8(2): 233–57.
30.
MercadoE.VallesM.de la PazP. (2016) ‘La formación en derechos humanos en los planes de estudio del Grado en Trabajo Social en España’, in CarboneroD.RayaE.CaparrósN.GimenoCh (eds) Respuestas transdisciplinares en una sociedad global. Aportaciones desde el Trabajo Social, pp. 1-23. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.
31.
MyersN.D.AhnS.JinY. (2011) ‘Sample Size and Power Estimates for a Confirmatory Factor Analytic Model in Exercise and Sport: A Monte Carlo Approach’, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport82: 412–23.
32.
NunnallyJ.C.BernsteinL.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
33.
SabaR. (2012) Pobreza, derechos y desigualdad estructural. México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
34.
SteenJ.MannM.GryglewiczK. (2016) ‘The Human Rights Philosophy: Support and Opposition among Undergraduate Social Work Students’, Journal of Teaching in Social Work36(5): 446–59.
35.
StellmacherJ.SommerG.BrahlerE. (2005) ‘The Cognitive Representation of Human Rights: Knowledge, Importance, and Commitment’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology11: 267–92.
36.
Torney-PurtaJ.WilkenfeldB.BarberC. (2008) ‘How Adolescents in 27 Countries Understand, Support, and Practice Human Rights’, Journal of Social Issues64: 857–80.
37.
TranT.V. (2009) Developing Cross-Cultural Measurement (Pocket Guide to Social Work Research Methods). New York: Oxford University Press.
