Drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a sample of 11 child protection workers and 11 parents in southern Estonia, this article reports the findings of participants’ experiences of and perspectives on parental engagement in the context of child protection assessment. The four themes that emerge from the content analysis suggest that participants’ perspectives differ in understanding and experiencing the engagement. Workers perceive the engagement more in terms of ‘doing for’ the client, while parents consider it ‘doing together with’ the worker. Furthermore, workers’ approaches are excessively related to the deficit-based approach.
AltmanJ.C. (2008) ‘A Study of Engagement in Neighborhood-Based Child Welfare Services’, Research on Social Work Practice18(6): 555–64.
2.
AxfordN. (2009) Defining and Classifying Children in Need. Farnham: Ashgate.
3.
Ayala-NunesL.JiménezL.HidalgoV.JesusS. (2014) ‘Family Feedback in Child Welfare Services: A Systematic Review of Measures’, Children and Youth Services Review44: 299–306.
4.
BakerA.J.L. (2007) ‘Client Feedback in Child Welfare Programs: Current Trends and Future Directions’, Children and Youth Services Review29: 1189–200.
5.
BessellS.GalT. (2009) ‘Forming Partnerships: The Human Rights of Children in Need of Care and Protection’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights17: 283–98.
6.
BroadhurstK.HoltK.DohertyP. (2011) ‘Accomplishing Parental Engagement in Child Protection Practice? A Qualitative Analysis of Parent-Professional Interaction in Pre-Proceedings Work under the Public Law Outline’, Qualitative Social Work121(5): 517–34.
7.
BuckleyH.WhelanS.CarrN. (2011) ‘Like Waking up in a Franz Kafka Novel’: Service Users’ Experiences of the Child Protection System when Domestic Violence and Acrimonious Separations Are Involved’, Children and Youth Services Review33: 126–33.
8.
ChavianoC.L.McWeyL.M.Lettenberger-KleinC.G.ClaridgeA.M.WojciakA.S.PettigrewH.V. (2016) ‘Promoting Change among Parents Involved in the Child Welfare System: Parents’ Reflections on Their Motivations to Change Parenting Behaviors’, Journal of Social Work. Epub ahead of print 14 June. DOI: 10.1177/1468017316654340.
9.
DammanJ.L. (2014) ‘Better Practices in Parent Engagement: Lessons from the USA and England’, European Journal of Social Work17(1): 32–44.
10.
DawsonK.BerryM. (2012) ‘Engaging Families in Child Welfare Services: An Evidence-Based Approach to Best Practice’, Child Welfare81(2) 293–317.
11.
De BortoliL.DolanM. (2015) ‘Decision Making in Social Work with Families and Children: Developing Decision-Aids Compatible with Cognition’, British Journal of Social Work45: 2142–60.
12.
Estonian Child Protection Act (2014) RT I, 06.12.2014, 1.
13.
EvangelouM.CoxonK.SylvaK.SmithS.ChanL.L.S. (2013) ‘Seeking to Engage ‘Hard-to-Reach’ Families: Towards a Transferable Model of Intervention’, Children & Society27: 127–38.
14.
FarrellA.F.LujánM.L.BritnerP.A.RandallK.G.GoodrichS.A. (2012) “I Am Part of Every Decision”: Client Perceptions of Engagement within a Supportive Housing Child Welfare Programme’, Child & Family Social Work17: 254–64.
15.
FergusonH. (2016) ‘Patterns of Engagement and Non-Engagement of Young Fathers in Early Intervention and Safeguarding Work’, Social Policy and Society15(1): 99–111.
16.
FullerT.L.PaceleyM.S.SchreiberJ.C. (2015) ‘Differential Response Family Assessments: Listening to What Parents Say about Service Helpfulness’, Child Abuse & Neglect39: 7–17.
17.
FuscoR.A. (2015) ‘Second Generation Mothers in the Child Welfare System: Factors that Predict Engagement’, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal32: 545–54.
18.
GallagherM.SmithM.HardyM.WilkinsonH. (2012) ‘Children and Families’ Involvement in Social Work Decision Making’, Children & Society26: 74–85.
19.
GallagherM.SmithM.WosuH.StewartJ.HunterS.CreeV.E.WilkinsonH. (2011) ‘Engaging with Families in Child Protection: Lessons from Practitioner Research in Scotland’, Child Welfare90(4): 117–34.
20.
GladstoneJ.DumbrillG.LeslieB.KosterA.YoungM.IsmailaA. (2012) ‘Looking at Engagement and Outcome from the Perspectives of Child Protection Workers and Parents’, Children and Youth Services Review34: 112–8.
21.
GladstoneJ.DumbrillG.LeslieB.KosterA.YoungM.IsmailaA. (2014) ‘Understanding Worker–Parent Engagement in Child Protection Casework’, Children and Youth Services Review44: 56–64.
22.
HarrisN. (2012) ‘Assessment: When Does It Help and When Does It Hinder? Parents’ Experiences of the Assessment Process’, Child & Family Social Work17: 180–91.
23.
HigginsM. (2015) ‘Child Protection Social Work in England: How Can It Be Reformed?’, British Journal of Social Work. Epub ahead of print 31August. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv078.
24.
KelleherL.ClearyM.JacksonD. (2012) ‘Compulsory Participation in a Child Protection and Family Enhancement Program: Mothers’ Experiences’, Contemporary Nurse41(1): 101–10.
25.
KempS.P.MarcenkoM.O.HoagwoodK.VesneskiW. (2009) ‘Engaging Parents in Child Welfare Services: Bridging Family Needs and Child Welfare Mandates’, Child Welfare88(1): 101–26.
26.
LomanL.A.SiegelG.L. (2015) ‘Effects of Approach and Services under Differential Response on Long Term Child Safety and Welfare’, Child Abuse & Neglect39: 86–97.
27.
McLendonT.McLendonD.DickersonP.S.LyonsJ.K.TappK. (2012) ‘Engaging Families in the Child Welfare Process Utilizing the Family-Directed Structural Assessment Tool’, Child Welfare91(6): 43–58.
28.
MainstoneF. (2014) Mastering Whole Family Assessment in Social Work: Balancing the Needs of Children, Adults and Their Families. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
29.
MartsE.J.LeeE.-K.McRoyR.McCroskeyJ. (2008) ‘Point of Engagement: Reducing Disproportionality and Improving Child and Family Outcomes’, Child Welfare87(2): 335–58.
30.
MelchiorreR.VisJ.-A. (2013) ‘Engagement Strategies and Change: An Intentional Practice Response for the Child Welfare Worker in Cases of Domestic Violence’, Child & Family Social Work18: 487–95.
31.
MichalopoulosL.AhnH.ShawT.V.O’ConnorJ. (2012) ‘Child Welfare Worker Perception of the Implementation of Family-Centered Practice’, Research on Social Work Practice22(6): 656–64.
32.
MorrisK. (2012) ‘Thinking Family? The Complexities for Family Engagement in Care and Protection’, British Journal of Social Work42: 906–20.
33.
MunfordR.SandersJ. (2016) ‘Understanding Service Engagement: Young People’s Experience of Service Use’, Journal of Social Work16(3): 283–302.
34.
NeyT.StoltzJ.-A.MaloneyM. (2011) ‘Voice, Power and Discourse: Experiences of Participants in Family Group Conferences in the Context of Child Protection’, Journal of Social Work13(2): 184–202.
35.
ÖstbergF. (2014) ‘Using “Consensual Ideology”: A Way to Sift Reports in Child Welfare’, British Journal of Social Work44: 63–80.
36.
PadgettD.K. (2008) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
37.
PartonN.O’ByrneP. (2000) Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
PennellJ.BurfordG.ConnollyM.MorrisK. (2011) ‘Introduction: Taking Child and Family Rights Seriously: Family Engagement and Its Evidence in Child Welfare’, Child Welfare90(4): 9–18.
39.
RandolphK.A.FinchamF.RadeyM. (2009) ‘A Framework for Engaging Parents in Prevention’, Journal of Family Social Work12(1): 56–72.
40.
SæbjørnsenS.E.N.WillumsenE. (2015) ‘Service User Participation in Interprofessional Teams in Child Welfare in Norway: Vulnerable Adolescents’ Perceptions’, Child & Family Social Work. Epub ahead of print 23 June. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12242.
41.
SchreiberJ.C.FullerT.PaceleyM.S. (2013) ‘Engagement in Child Protective Services: Parent Perceptions of Worker Skills’, Children and Youth Services Review35: 707–15.
42.
SlettebøT. (2013) ‘Partnership with Parents of Children in Care: A Study of Collective User Participation in Child Protection Services’, British Journal of Social Work43: 579–95.
43.
SnyderE.H.LawrenceC.N.WeatherholtT.N.NagyP. (2012) ‘The Benefits of Motivational Interviewing and Coaching for Improving the Practice of Comprehensive Family Assessments in Child Welfare’, Child Welfare91(5): 9–36.
44.
TaylorA.TonerP.TempletonL.VellemanR. (2008) ‘Parental Alcohol Misuse in Complex Families: The Implications for Engagement’, British Journal of Social Work38: 843–64.
45.
TorosK. (2011) Assessment of Child Well-Being: Child Protection Practice in Estonia. Tallinn: Tallinn University.
46.
TorosK. (2012) ‘Child Protection Assessment Practices in Estonia’, Social Policy and Social Work in Transition3(1): 25–49.
47.
TorosK., A.TikoSaiaK. (2013) ‘Child-Centered Approach in the Context of the Assessment of Children in Need: Reflections of Child Protection Workers in Estonia’, Children and Youth Services Review35(6): 1015–1022.
48.
TorosK.LaSalaM.C. (2015) ‘Estonian Child Protection Workers’ Assessment Perspectives: The Need for Competence and Confidence’, International Social Work. Epub ahead of print 27 November 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0020872815603788.
49.
TorosK.LaSalaM.C.MedarM. (2015) ‘Assessment of Children in Need in a Post-Soviet Context: Reflections of Child Protective Workers in Estonia’, Journal of Family Social Work18(4): 267–287.
50.
WhittakerK.A.CoxP.ThomasN.CockerK. (2014) ‘A Qualitative Study of Parents’ Experiences Using Family Support Services: Applying the Concept of Surface and Depth’, Health and Social Care in the Community22(5): 479–87.
51.
WilliamsonE.GrayA. (2011) ‘New Roles for Families in Child Welfare: Strategies for Expanding Family Involvement Beyond the Case Level’, Children and Youth Services Review33: 1212–6.
