The aim of this comparative study was to explore how community work is being undertaken in marginalized urban settings in Germany and Sweden, in relation to changing contexts of respective welfare models. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in neighborhoods in Gävle, Sweden, and Paderborn, Germany, and were analyzed by abductive thematic discourse analysis, using Atlas.ti and MaxQData. The results showed that community work in the respective settings is affected by lack of sufficient resources to meet increasing levels of social exclusion, related to ongoing transformation processes of the welfare regimes, and there is a lack of collective empowerment perspectives for social change.
AskheimO.P. (2003) ‘Empowerment as Guidance for Professional Social Work: An Act of Balancing on a Slack Rope’, European Journal of Social Work6(3): 229–40.
5.
BarkerR.L. (2003) The Social Work Dictionary, 5th edn.Washington, DC: NASW Press.
6.
BaumanZ. (2000) Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
BeckU.GiddensA.LashS. (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Bristol: The Polity Press.
8.
BenzB. (2010) ‘Sozialpolitik und Soziale Arbeit’, in BenzB.BoeckhJ.Mogge-GrotjahnH. (eds) Soziale Politik – Soziale Lage – Soziale Arbeit, pp. 317–36. Wiesabden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
9.
BerghA. (2004) ‘The Universal Welfare State: Theory and the Case of Sweden’, Political Studies52(4): 745–66.
10.
BodeI. (2006) ‘Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy16: 346–59.
11.
BoeßeneckerK.H. (2003) ‘Wohlfahrtsverbände, Non-Profit-Organisationen und bürgerschaftliches Engagement’, in DahmeH.J.OttoH.-U.TrubeA.WohlfahrN. (eds) Soziale Arbeit für den aktivierenden Staat, pp. 149–76. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
12.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BrakeR.FaßbenderK. (2008) ‘History and Community Development in Germany’, in BrakeR.DellerU. (eds) Community Development – A European Challenge, pp. 32–40. Opladen; Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
14.
BriskmanL.PeaseB.AllanJ. (2009) ‘Introducing Critical Theories for Social Work in a Neo-liberal Context’, in AllanJ.BriskmanL.PeaseB. (eds) Critical Social Work, 2nd edn, pp. 3–15. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
ButterweggeC. (2013) Krise und Zukunft des Sozialstaates. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
17.
CochraneA.ClarkeJ.GewirtzS. (2001) Comparing Welfare States. London: SAGE.
18.
CrandallR.W. (1993) The Continuing Decline of Manufacturing in the Rust Belt. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19.
DahmeH.J.WohlfahrtN. (2002) ‘Aktivierender Staat. Ein neues sozialpolitisches Leitbild und seine Auswirkungen auf die soziale Arbeit’, Neue Praxis32: 10–32.
20.
DansoR. (2009) ‘Emancipating and Empowering De-valued Skilled Immigrants: What Hope Does Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice Offer?’, British Journal of Social Work39(3): 539–55.
21.
DenvallV.HeuleC.KristiansenA. (eds) (2011) Social Mobilisering. Malmö: Gleerups.
22.
DominelliL. (2002) Anti-oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
DominelliL. (2012) Green Social Work: From Environmental Crises to Environmental Justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
DuboisA.GaddeL.E. (2002) ‘Systematic Combining: An Abductive Approach to Case Research’, Journal of Business Research55(2): 553–60.
25.
DuBoisB.MileyK.K. (2011) Social Work: An Empowering Profession, 7th edn.Boston, MA: Pearson.
26.
EderK. (2009) ‘A Theory of Collective Identity Making Sense of the Debate on a “European Identity”’, European Journal of Social Theory12(4): 427–47.
27.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Esping-AndersenG. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
EsserH. (2010) ‘Integration und “Multikulturalität”’, in LuftS.SchimannyP. (eds) Integration Von Zuwanderern, pp. 277–97. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
31.
FeilzerM.Y. (2010) ‘Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research4(1): 6–16.
32.
FookJ. (2002) Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice. London: SAGE.
33.
ForbrigJ. (2011) ‘Citizen Participation and Local Democracy in Europe’, in ForbrigJ. (ed.) Learning for Democracy: A Study of Local Participation in Europe, pp. 5–20. Brussels: CEBSD.
34.
FoucaultM. (1997) Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
35.
Frankfort-NachmiasC.NachmiasD. (2008) Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 7th edn.New York: Worth Publishers.
36.
FreireP. (1973) Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
37.
FreiseM.PajasP. (2004) ‘Organisational and Legal Forms of Nonprofit Organizations in Central Europe’, in ZimmerA.PrillerE. (eds) Future of Civil Society, pp. 129–46. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
GreveB. (2007) ‘What Characterise the Nordic Welfare State Model’, Journal of Social Science3(2): 43–51.
41.
GutierrezL.MayeG.L.DeLoisK. (1995) ‘The Organizational Context of Empowerment Practice: Implications for Social Work Administration’, Social Work40: 249–58.
42.
HareI. (2004) ‘Defining Social Work for the 21st Century: The International Federation of Social Workers’ Revised Definition of Social Work’, International Social Work47(3): 407–24.
43.
HarryssonL.O’BrienM. (eds) (2007) Social Welfare, Social Exclusion: A Life Course Frame. Lund: Varpinge Ord & Text.
44.
HautekeurG.HendersonP. (2008) ‘Community Development in Europe’, in BrakeR.DellerU. (eds) Community Development – A European Challenge, pp. 94–110. Opladen; Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
45.
HealyK. (2000) Social Work Practices: Contemporary Perspectives on Change. London: SAGE.
46.
HealyK. (2001) ‘Reinventing Critical Social Work: Challenges from Practice, Context and Postmodernism’, Critical Social Work2(1): 4–15.
47.
HealyK. (2005) Social Work Theories in Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
HegelichS.SchubertK. (2008) ‘Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme: Politisch limitierter Pluralismus als europäisches Spezifikum’, in SchubertK.HegelichS.BazantU. (eds) Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme. Ein Handbuch, pp. 647–60. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
49.
HongP.Y.SongI.H. (2010) ‘Glocalization of Social Work Practice: Global and Local Responses to Globalization’, International Social Work53(5): 656–70.
50.
HormelU.ScheerA. (2004) Bildung in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
51.
HospersG.J. (2004) ‘Restructuring Europe’s Rustbelt: The Case of the German Ruhrgebiet’, Intereconomics3(39): 147–56.
52.
HurM.H. (2006) ‘Empowerment in Terms of Theoretical Perspectives: Exploring a Typology of the Process and Components across Disciplines’, Journal of Community Psychology34(5): 523–40.
53.
HutchinsonG.S. (ed.) (2009) Community Work in the Nordic Countries – New Trends. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
KaufmannF.-X. (2003) Varianten des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
56.
KesslF.OttoH.U. (2009) Soziale Arbeit ohne Wohlfahrtsstaat?Weinheim; München: Beltz Juventa.
57.
KohlJ. (1993) ‘Der Wohlfahrtsstaat in vergleichender Perspektive’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform39(2): 67–82.
58.
Kommittén välfärdsbokslut (2000) Välfärd vid vägskäl. SOU 2000:3. Stockholm: Norstedts.
59.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
60.
LarssonS.SjöblomY. (2010) ‘Perspectives on Narrative Methods in Social Work Research’, International Journal of Social Welfare3(19): 272–80.
61.
LindénK. (2009) ‘Community Work: Integration or Mobilisation?’, in HutchinsonG.S. (ed.) Community Work in the Nordic Countries – New Trends, pp. 168–83. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
62.
LutzR. (2008) ‘Perspektiven der Sozialen Arbeit’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte12–13: 3–10.
63.
MidgleyJ. (2001) ‘Issues in International Social Work: Resolving Critical Debates in the Profession’, Journal of Social Work1(1): 21–35.
64.
MidgleyJ.AdlerS. (1978) ‘Community Work Teaching at Schools of Social Work in Developing Countries’, Community Development Journal13(3): 131–9.
65.
MishraR. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
66.
MullalyB. (2010) Challenging Oppression and Confronting Privilege, 2nd edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
MunckR. (2004) Globalization and Social Exclusion, 2nd edn.West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
68.
MünnichS. (2011) ‘Wie weit reicht der Einfluss von Ideen? Herausforderungen und Grenzen ideen- und diskursorientierter Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform57(4): 487–98.
69.
MunschC. (2003) Sozial Benachteiligte engagieren sich doch, Über lokales Engagement und soziale Ausgrenzung und die Schwierigkeiten der Gemeinwesenarbeit. Weinheim: Beltz.
70.
O’ConnorJ.OrloffA.ShaverS. (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
OlsenG. (1994) ‘Labour Mobilization and the Strength of Capital’, in ClementW.MahonR. (eds) Swedish Social Democracy: A Model in Transition. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press, pp. 195–222.
72.
OlsonS.E. (1990) Social Policy and Welfare State in Sweden. Lund: Arkiv.
73.
OppK.D. (2012) ‘Collective Identity, Rationality and Collective Political Action’, Rationality and Society24(1): 73–105.
74.
PaivaJ.F.X. (1977) ‘A Conception of Social Development’, Social Development Issues15(2): 327–37.
75.
PandeyR.S. (1981) ‘Strategies for Social Development: An Analytical Approach’, in JonesJ.F.PandeyR.S. (eds) Social Development: Conceptual, Methodological and Political Issues, pp. 33–49. Delhi, India: Macmillan.
76.
PankokeE. (2004) ‘Voluntary Associations and Civic Engagement’, in ZimmerA.PrillerE. (eds) Future of Civil Society, pp. 57–76. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
77.
PascallG.LewisJ. (2004) ‘Emerging Gender Regimes and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe’, Journal for Social Policy33(3): 373–94.
78.
PattonM.Q. (2004) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th edn.London: SAGE.
79.
PayneM. (2005) Modern Social Work Theory, 3rd edn.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
80.
PeaseB. (2002) ‘Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice’, British Journal of Social Work32: 135–47.
81.
PiersonJ. (2009) Tackling Social Exclusion, 2nd edn.London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
82.
PollettaF.JasperJ. (2001) ‘Collective Identity and Social Movements’, Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 283–305.
83.
PutnamR.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
84.
RadaelliC.M. (2003) ‘The Europeanization of Public Policy’, in FeatherstoneK.RadaelliC.M. (eds) The Politics of Europeanization, pp. 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85.
RambareeK.FaxelidE. (2013) ‘Considering Abductive Thematic Network Analysis with ATLAS-ti 6.2’, in SappletonN. (ed.) Advancing Research Methods with New Media Technologies, pp. 170–87. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
86.
RobertsonR. (1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: SAGE.
87.
RobertsonR.WhiteK.M. (2002) Globality and Modernity. London: SAGE.
88.
RothmanJ. (1995) ‘Approaches to Community Intervention’, in RothmanJ.ErlichJ.L.TropmanJ.E. (eds) Strategies of Community Intervention, 5th edn, pp. 26–63. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
89.
RothschuhM.SpitzenbergerE. (2010) ‘Auf dem Weg zu handlungsbezogenen Theorien der Gemeinwesenarbeit’, in GahleitnerS.EffingerH.KrausB.MietheI.StövesandS.SagebielJ. (eds) Disziplin und Profession Sozialer Arbeit. Entwicklungen und Perspektiven, pp. 77–94. Opladen; Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
90.
RubinH.RubinI.S. (2001) Community Organizing and Development, 3rd edn.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
91.
RustebergE.AppelA.DabrowskaJ. (2004) ‘Evaluation in Nonprofit Civil Society Organizations’, in ZimmerA.PrillerE. (eds) Future of Civil Society, pp. 525–46. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
92.
SachwehP. (2011) ‘Ideen, Werte und Kultur als Erklärungsfaktoren in der Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform57(4): 371–82.
93.
SainsburyD. (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
SandbergÅ. (ed.) (2013) Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS.
95.
SchmidJ. (2010) Wohlfahrtsstaaten im Vergleich, 3rd edn.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
96.
SchönigW. (2008) ‘Born to Be Wild? Aktuelle Varianten, Zielgruppen und Haltungen der Gemeinwesenarbeit’, in BlandowR.KnabeJ.OttersbachM. (eds) Die Zukunft der Gemeinwesenarbeit. Von der Revolte zur Steuerung und zurück? pp. 29–44. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
SjöbergS.RambareeK.JojoB. (2014) ‘Collective Empowerment: A Comparative Study of Community Work in Mumbai and Stockholm’, International Journal of Social Welfare. Epub ahead of print 9December. DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.1237.
99.
Socialstyrelsen (2010) Social rapport [Social report]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
StepneyP.PoppleK. (2008) Social Work and the Community: A Critical Context for Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
103.
SundK. (1999) ‘Socialtjänstens strukturinriktade arbete: utveckling, möjligheter och hinder’, PhD Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.
104.
TaketA.CrispB.R.NevillA.LamaroG.GrahamM.Barter-GodfreyS. (2009) Theorising Social Exclusion. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
105.
TanA. (2009) Community Development Theory and Practice: Bridging the Divide between ‘Micro’ and ‘Macro’ Levels of Social Work. Paper presented at the North American Association of Christians in Social Work (NASW) Convention, October, Indianapolis, IN.
106.
TewJ. (2006) ‘Understanding Power and Powerlessness: Towards a Framework for Emancipatory Practice in Social Work’, Journal of Social Work6(1): 33–51.
107.
TrevithickP. (2012) Social Work Skills and Knowledge, 3rd edn.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
108.
TurunenP. (2004) ‘Samhällsarbete i Norden. Diskurser och praktiker i omvandling’ [Community Work in Scandinavia. Discourses and Practices in Transformation], PhD Thesis, Växjö: Växjö University Press.
109.
TurunenP. (2009) ‘Nordic Community Work in Transition’, in HutchinsonG.S. (ed.) Community Work in the Nordic Countries – New Trends. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 38–63.
Van KersbergenK. (2000) ‘The Declining Resistance of Welfare States to Change?’, in KuhleS. (ed.) Survival of the European Welfare State, pp. 19–36. London; New York: Routledge.
112.
WacquantL. (2008) Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
113.
WahlbergS. (2013) Samhällsarbete: strategier för socialt arbete [Community Work: Strategies for Social Work]. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
114.
WeberM. (1995 [1904]) Die Objektivität sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
115.
WenocurS.ReischM. (1989) From Charity to Enterprise: The Development of American Social Work in a Market Economy. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
116.
YeatesN. (2008) Understanding Global Social Policy. Southampton: Policy Press.
117.
ZimmerA. (2004) ‘Civil Society: Introduction to Regulatory Framework’, in ZimmerA.PrillerE. (eds) Future of Civil Society, pp. 123–8. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
