International private law to regulate commercial global surrogacy practices: Just what are social work’s practical policy recommendations?

Abstract

International private law is currently being considered to regulate commercial global surrogacy. This brief note discusses the state of social work literature in addition to the International Federation of Social Workers’ position statement, identifying a lack of empirical grounding in social work research. Global surrogacy is framed against previous social work research and policy development related to intercountry adoption and international private law. A triad approach to regulation is discussed as a three-legged stool for social protection development. Conclusions include recommendations for a research agenda that includes the voices of surrogates and the children.

Keywords

commercial surrogacy global international private law social work surrogacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

(2011) ‘Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy’, Hypatia 26(4): 715–41.

Ballard

Goodno

Cochran

Milbrandt

(eds) (in press) The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Baslington

(2002) ‘The Social Organization of Surrogacy: Relinquishing a Baby and the Role of Payment in the Psychological Detachment Process’, Journal of Health Psychology 7(1): 57–71.

Blyth

(1994) ‘I Wanted to Be Interesting, I Wanted to Be Able to Say I’ve Done Something Interesting with My Life’: Interviews with Surrogate Mothers in Britain’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12(3): 189–98.

Blyth

(2010) ‘Fertility Patients’ Experiences of Cross-Border Reproductive Care’, Fertility and Sterility 94(1): e11–5.

Blyth

Farrand

(2005) ‘Reproductive Tourism – A Price Worth Paying for Reproductive Autonomy? Critical Social Policy 25(1): 91–114.

Blyth

Frith

(2008) ‘The UK’s Gamete Donor ‘Crisis’ – A Critical Analysis’, Critical Social Policy 28(1): 74–95.

Blyth

Crawshaw

Haase

Speirs

(2001) ‘The Implications of Adoption for Donor Offspring following Donor-Assisted Conception’, Child & Family Social Work 6(4): 295–304.

Bromfield

Rotabi

(2014) ‘Global Surrogacy, Exploitation, Human Rights and International Private Law: A Pragmatic Stance and Policy Recommendations’, Global Social Welfare 1: 123–135.

10.

Ciccarelli

Beckman

(2005) ‘Navigating Rough Waters: An Overview of Psychological Aspects of Surrogacy’, Journal of Social Issues 61(1): 21–43.

11.

Crawshaw

Fronek

Blyth

Elvin

(2014) What Are Children’s ‘Best Interests’ in International Surrogacy. Professional Social Work (British Association of Social Workers). Available online at: http://www.basw.co.uk/resource/?id=3176

12.

Cuthbert

Fronek

(2014) ‘Perfecting Adoption? Reflections on the Rise of Commercial Offshore Surrogacy and Family Formation in Australia’, in Hayes

Higgins

(eds) Families, Policy and the Law: Selected Essays on Contemporary Issues for Australia, pp. 55–66. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

13.

Damelio

Sorensen

(2008) ‘Enhancing Autonomy in Paid Surrogacy’, Bioethics 22(5): 269–77.

14.

Donchin

(2010) ‘Reproductive Tourism and the Quest for Global Gender Justice’, Bioethics 27(7): 323–32.

15.

Fronek

Crawshaw

(2014) ‘The ‘New Family’ as an Emerging Norm: A Commentary on the Position of Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work. Epub ahead of print 12 January. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bct198.

16.

Fronek

Crawshaw

Blyth

Elvin

(2014) ‘International Surrogacy: A Report from the Roundtable’, The Bulletin (Australian Association of Social Workers), Winter 30–1.

17.

Gibbons

J.L.

Rotabi

K.S.

(eds) (2012) Intercountry Adoption: Policies, Practices, and Outcomes. Surrey: Ashgate Press.

18.

Gugucheva

(2010) ‘Surrogacy in America’, Council for Responsible Genetics.

19.

Hague Conference on International Private Law (1993) ‘The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption’, 29 May, available online at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=69

20.

Hague Conference on International Private Law (2012) ‘A Preliminary Report on the Issues Arising from International Surrogacy Arrangements’, Available from http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2012pd10en.pdf

21.

Haimowitz

Sinha

(Producers/Directors) (2010) ‘Made in India’, Available online at: www.madeinindiamovie.com

22.

Henaghan

(2013) ‘International Surrogacy Trends: How Family Law is Coping. Sixth World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Rights’. Australian Journal of Adoption 7(3).

23.

Hohman

Hagan

(2001) ‘Satisfaction with Surrogate Mothering: A Relational Model’, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 4: 61–84.

24.

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2008) ‘Cross-Border Reproductive Services’, Available online at http://ifsw.org/policies/cross-border-reproductive-services/

25.

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2013, December 4) ‘Taking the IFSW Policy on International Surrogacy Forward – Seeking Social Worker’s Views’, Available online at http://ifsw.org/news/the-private-international-law-issues-surrounding-the-status-of-children-including-issues-arising-from-international-surrogacy-arrangements/

26.

Jadva

Murray

Lycett

Macallum

Golombok

(2003) ‘Surrogacy: The Experiences of Surrogate Mothers’, Human Reproduction 18(10): 2196–204.

27.

Jadva

Blake

Casey

Golombok

(2012) ‘Surrogacy Families 10 Years on Relationship with the Surrogate, Decisions over Disclosure and Children’s Understanding of Their Surrogacy Origins’, Human Reproduction 27(10): 3008–14.

28.

Karandikar

Gezinski

L.B.

Carter

J.R.

Kalonga

(online first, January 2014) ‘Economic Necessity or Noble Cause? A Qualitative Study Exploring Motivations for Gestational Surrogacy in Gujarat, India’, Affilia. DOI: 10.1177/0886109913516455.

29.

Kessler

(2009) ‘Recruiting Wombs: Surrogates as the New Security Moms’, Women’s Studies Quarterly 37(1 & 2): 167–82.

30.

Ketchum

(1992) ‘Selling Babies and Selling Bodies’, Holmes

Purdy

(Eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

31.

Kleinpeter

Hohman

(2000) ‘Surrogate Motherhood: Personality Traits and Satisfaction with Service Providers’, Psychological Reports 87: 957–70.

32.

Kohli

(2011, 12 March) ‘Moms market’, Hindustan Times Retrieved January 26, 2014 from http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/moms-market/article1–672727.aspx

33.

Markens

(2010–2011) ‘Interrogating Narratives: about the Global Surrogacy Market’, The Scholar and Feminist Online 9 (1–2.). Available online at: http://sfonline.barnard.edu/reprotech/markens_01.htm

34.

Palattiyil

Blyth

Sidhva

Balakrishnan

(2010) ‘Globalization and Cross-Border Reproductive Services: Ethical Implications of Surrogacy in India for Social Work’, International Social Work 53(5): 686–700.

35.

Pande

(2009) ‘Not “an Angel,” Not “a Whore”: Surrogates as “Dirty” Workers in India’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16: 141–73.

36.

Pande

(2010) ‘At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone’: Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India’, Feminist Studies 36(2): 292–312.

37.

Parks

(2010) ‘Care Ethics and the Global Practice of Commercial Surrogacy’, Bioethics 24(7): 333–40.

38.

Ragone

(1994) Conception in the Heart. Boulder: West View Press.

39.

Roby

Brown

(in press) ‘Birth Parents as Victims of Trafficking in Intercountry Adoption’ in the Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines. Eds Ballard

Goodno

Cochran

Milbrandt

Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

40.

Ross-Sheriff

(2012) ‘Transnational Cross-Racial Surrogacy: Issues and Concerns’, Affilia 27(2): 125–8.

41.

Rotabi

K.S.

Gibbons

J.L.

(2012) ‘Does the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption Adequately Protect Orphaned and Vulnerable Children and Their Families?’, Journal of Child and Family Studies 21(1): 106–19.

42.

Rotabi

K.S.

Bromfield

N.F.

(2012) ‘Intercountry Adoption Declines Lead to New Practices of Global Surrogacy in Guatemala: Global Human Rights Concerns in the Context of Violence and the Era of Advanced Fertility Technology’, Affilia 27(2): 129–41.

43.

SAMA–Resource Group for Women and Health (2012) ‘Birthing a Market: a Study on Commercial Surrogacy’, Available online at http://www.samawomenshealth.org/downloads/Birthing%20A%20Market.pdf

44.

Smolin

D.M.

(2010) ‘Child Laundering and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: The Future and past of Intercountry Adoption’, Louisville Law Review 48: 441–98.

45.

Stark

(2012) ‘Transnational Surrogacy and International Human Rights Law’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 18(2).

46.

Storrow

(2013) ‘New Thinking on Commercial Surrogacy’, Indiana Law Journal 88(1281): pp. 1281–8.

47.

Tezz Reporter (2013, November 6) ‘Unregulated Surrogacy Exploits India’s Poor’, Retrieved January 27, 2014 from http://tezznews.com/unregulated-surrogacy-exploits-indias-poor/

48.

Trimmings

Beaumont

(2011) ‘International Surrogacy Arrangements: An Urgent Need for Legal Regulation at the International Level’, Journal of Private International Law 7(3): pp. 627–47.