This article addresses ‘the making’ of the Global Agenda in social work by situating the process of agenda-setting itself as an object of critical reflection. It discusses the way in which the agenda positions social work as part of a global civil society network somewhat removed from grassroots social work and raises concerns about its failure to address the causes of or possible solutions to social and economic inequality. The authors deploy recent empirical research relating to object-oriented politics, particularly the ‘no issue, no public’ debate on political mobilization as a more viable alternative in contributing to structural change.
BadiouA. (2008) ‘Live Badiou: Interview with Alain Badiou, Paris, December 2007’, in FelthamO. (ed.) Alain Badiou: Live Theory, pp. 136–9. London: Continuum.
2.
BainesD. (2006) ‘Social Work and Neo-liberalism: “If You Could Change One Thing”: Social Service Workers and Restructuring’, Social Work59(1): 20–34.
3.
BainesD. (2008) ‘Neoliberal Restructuring, Activism/participation, and Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly39(1): 10–28.
4.
BainesD. (2010) ‘“If We Don’t Get Back to Where We Were Before”: Working in the Restructured Non-profit Social Services’, British Journal of Social Work40(3): 928–45.
5.
BobC. (2005) The Marketing of Rebellion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CareyM. (2007) ‘White-collar Proletariat?: Braverman, the Deskilling/Upskilling of Social Work and the Paradoxical Life of the Agency Care Manager’, Journal of Social Work7: 93–114.
7.
CareyM. (2009) ‘The Order of Chaos: Exploring Agency Care Managers’ Construction of Social Order within Fragmented Worlds of State Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work39(3): 556–73.
8.
CareyM.FosterV.L. (2011) ‘Introducing “Deviant Social Work”: Contextualising the Limits of Radical Social Work whilst Understanding (Fragmented Resistance within the Social Work Labour Process’, British Journal of Social Work43(1): 576–93.
9.
CarpenterR.C. (2010) ‘Governing the Global Agenda: “Gate-keepers” and “Issue Adoption” in Transnational Advocacy Networks’, in FinnemoreM.AvantD.SellS. (eds) Who Governs the Globe?, pp. 201–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChandhokeN. (2002) ‘The Limits of Global Civil Society’, in GlasiusM.KaldorM.AnheierH. (eds) Global Civil Society, pp. 35–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeleuzeG. (1992) ‘Postscript on Societies of Control’, October59: 3–7.
12.
De VriesG. (2007) ‘What is Political in Sub-politics? How Aristotle Might Help STS’, Social Studies of Science37(5): 781–809.
13.
DeweyJ. (1991 [1927]) The Public and its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.
14.
FergusonI.WoodwardR. (2009) Radical Social Work in Practice: Making a Difference. Bristol: Policy Press.
15.
GrayM. (2005) ‘Dilemmas of International Social Work: Paradoxical Processes in Indigenisation, Imperialism and Universalism’, International Journal of Social Welfare14(2): 230–7.
16.
GrayM.WebbS.A. (2008) ‘The Myth of Global Social Work: Double Standards and the Local–Global Divide’, Journal of Progressive Human Services19(1): 61–6.
17.
GrayM.WebbS.A. (eds) (2013) The New Politics of Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
18.
The Guardian (2012) ‘Social Work Rises to a New Level: Social Work Day at the United Nations is Part of a Global Campaign to Reposition the Profession’, Guardian Professional, Monday 26March, 13.10 BST, available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/social-care-network/2012/mar/26/world-social-work-day-2012 (accessed 12 February 2013).
19.
HarrisJ. (2003) The Social Work Business. London: Routledge.
20.
International Federation of Social Workers, International Association of Schools of Social Work and International Council on Social Welfare (IFSW/IASSW/ICSW) (2010) ‘Draft Agenda’, Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: Towards an Engagement Agenda: Mobilisation of Social Workers, Social Work Educators & Policy Practitioners and Developers for Global Social Change, available online at: http://cdn.ifsw.org/assets/ifsw_84013-7.pdf (accessed 19 April 2013).
21.
International Federation of Social Workers, International Association of Schools of Social Work and International Council on Social Welfare (IFSW/IASSW/ICSW) (2012) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: Commitment to Action’, available online at: www.globalsocialagenda.org (accessed 13 February 2013).
22.
JamesonF. (2003) ‘Future City’, New Left Review21: 65–79.
23.
JonesD.TruellR. (2012a) ‘The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: A Place to Link Together and Be Effective in a Globalized World’, International Social Work55(4): 454–72. doi: 10.1177/0020872812440587.
24.
JonesD.TruellR. (2012b) ‘Social Work Rises to a New Level: Social Work Day at the United Nations is Part of a Global Campaign to Reposition the Profession’, Guardian Professional Monday 26March, 13.10 BST, available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/social-care-network/2012/mar/26/world-social-work-day-2012 (accessed 12 February 2013).
25.
LorenzW. (1994) Social Work in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.
26.
MarresN. (2005) No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits after the Displacement of Politics. Amsterdam: Ipskamp Printpartners.
27.
MarresN. (2007) ‘The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy’, Social Studies of Science37(5): 759–80.
28.
MarresN. (2012) Issue Mapping: Demonstrating the Relevance for Participatory Social Research. London: ESRC Digital Social Research Demonstrator Project.
29.
MarstonG.McDonaldC. (2012) ‘Getting Beyond “Heroic Agency” in Conceptualising Social Workers as Policy Actors in the Twenty-first Century’, British Journal of Social Work42(6): 1022–38.
30.
MortonT. (2011) ‘Here Comes Everything: The Promise of Object-oriented Ontology’, Qui Parle19(2): 163–90.
31.
NadkarniV.V. (2013) ‘IASSW and Social Work Day at the United Nations: A Proud Achievement’, International Social Work56(2): 252–6.
PutnamR. (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
ScheufeleD.A.IyengarS. (forthcoming) ‘The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions’, in KenskiK.JamiesonJ.H. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories. New York: Oxford University Press. Available online at: http://dietramscheufele.com/Scheufele_Iyengar_Framing.pdf (accessed 19 April 2013).
SmismansS. (2002) ‘“Civil Society” in European Institutional Discourses’, paper presented to the ECPR Joint Sessions, Workshop 7: Rescuing Democracy: The Lure of the Associative Elixir, 22–27 March, Turin.
38.
SumnerA. (2012) ‘Global Poverty Reduction: The Last 20 Years and the Next 20 Years’, European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) Policy Paper Series. Available online at: www.eadi.org/…/EADI_policy_paper_december_2012.pdf (accessed 19 April 2013).
WebbS.A. (2003) ‘Local Orders and Global Chaos in Social Work’, European Journal of Social Work6(2): 191–204.
42.
WitteJ.M.ReinickeW.H.BennerT. (2000) ‘Beyond Multilateralism: Global Public Policy Networks’, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft2: 176–88.
43.
ZelenevS. (2013) ‘IASSW, ICSW and IFSW Establish Global Agenda Observatory’, International Social Work56(3): 420–22.
44.
ŽižekS. (2008) ‘Censorship Today: Violence, or Ecology as a New Opium for the Masses’, available online at: http://www.lacan.com/zizecology1.htm (accessed 13 April 2013).
