I argue that international social work education is constructed using nationalist assumptions that define and limit practices of social care to nation-state boundaries. This is particularly true of the profession as it is practiced in (neo)liberal welfare states of the global north. Using citizenship theory I interrogate interpretations of liberal citizenship to illuminate and analyze its relationship to nationalist definitions of social work practice. I posit an alternative notion of citizenship that defines citizenship more broadly in terms of participation and belonging irrespective of nation-state boundaries and acknowledges the transnational realities of people, social issues and socio-economic hierarchies.
AbramF.Y.CruceA. (2007) ‘A Re-conceptualization of “Reverse Mission” for International Social Work Education and Practice’, Social Work Education26(1): 3–19.
BhabhaH.K. (1994) The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
4.
BogoM.HeringtonW. (1988) ‘Consultation in Social Work Education in the International Context’, International Social Work31: 305–16.
5.
BrodieJ. (2008) ‘The Social in Social Citizenship’, in IsinE. (ed.) Recasting the Social in Citizenship, pp. 20–43. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6.
DominelliL. (2004) ‘International Social Work Education at the Crossroads’, Social Work and Society2(1): 87–95.
7.
HareI. (2004) ‘Defining Social Work for the 21st Century: The International Federation of Social Workers’ Revised Definition of Social Work’, International Social Work47(3): 407–24.
8.
HaugE. (2005) ‘Critical Reflections on the Emerging Discourse of International Social Work’, International Social Work4(8): 126–35.
9.
HealyL.M. (1995) ‘Comparative and International Overview’, in WattsT.D.ElliottD.MayadasN. (eds) International Handbook on Social Work Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10.
HealyL.M. (2008) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
HeronB. (2006) ‘Critically Considering International Social Work Practica’, Critical Social Work7(2).
12.
HugmanR.Moosa-MithaM.MoyoO. (2010) ‘Towards a Borderless Social Work: Reconsidering Notions of International Social Work’, International Social Work53(5): 629–43.
13.
IsinE.BrodieJ.JuteauD.StasiliusD. (2008) ‘Recasting the Social in Citizenship’, in IsinE. (ed.) Recasting the Social in Citizenship, pp. 3–17. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
14.
KendallK.A. (1979) ‘Toward Reciprocity in Technical Assistance through Collegial Relationships’, International Social Work22: 2–8.
15.
KhanP.DominelliL. (2000) ‘The Impact of Globalisation on Social Work in the UK’, European Journal of Social Work3(2): 95–108.
16.
ListerR. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
17.
ListerR. (2007) ‘Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential’, Citizenship Studies11(1): 49–61.
18.
LyonsK. (2012) ‘Introduction’, in LyonsK.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (eds) The Sage Handbook of International Social Work. London: SAGE.
19.
MarshallT.H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
MidgleyJ. (2001) ‘Issues in International Social Work: Resolving Critical Debates in the Profession’, Journal of Social Work1(1): 21–35.
21.
MohanB. (2008) ‘Rethinking International Social Work’, International Social Work51: 11–24.
22.
Moosa-MithaM. (2005) ‘A Difference-centered Alternative to Theorization of Children’s Citizenship Rights’, Citizenship Studies9(4): 369–88.
23.
Moosa-MithaM.Ross-SheriffF. (2010) ‘Transnational Social Work and Lessons Learned from Transnational Feminism’, Affilia25(2): 105–09.
24.
NagyG.FalkD. (2000) ‘Dilemmas in International and Cross-national Social Work Education’, International Social Work43(1): 49–60.
25.
Nuttman-ShwartzO.BergerR. (2011) ‘Field Education in International Social Work: Where We Are and Where We Should Go’, International Social Work55(2): 225–43.
26.
PflanzS. (2011) ‘Internationalizing Me: A Look Inside at the International Social Work Practicum’, unpublished Masters in Social Work Research Report, University of Victoria, School of Social Work.
27.
PollackS. (2009) ‘Creating Submissive Subjects: Lone Mothers and Social Assistance Regimes in Canada’, Benefits17(3): 225–35.
28.
PowellJ.RobisonJ. (2007) ‘The “International Dimension” in Social Work Education: Current Developments in England’, European Journal of Social Work10(3): 383–99.
29.
SewpaulV. (2005) ‘Global Standards: Promises and Pitfalls for Inscribing Social Work into Civil Society’, International Journal of Social Welfare14(3): 210–17.
30.
StasiliusD. (2008) ‘The Migration-Citizenship Nexus’, in IsinE. (ed.) Recasting the Social in Citizenship, pp. 134–61. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31.
WebbS.A. (2003) ‘Local Orders and Global Chaos in Social Work’, European Journal of Social Work6: 191–204.
32.
WerbnerP.Yuval-DavisN. (1999) ‘Introduction: Women and the New Discourse of Citizenship’, in Yuval-DavisN.WerbnerP. (eds) Women, Citizenship and Difference, pp. 1–12. London and New York: Zed Books.
