This article analyses the work position of social workers in Italy according to national research carried out in 2008 which considers 1000 people registered at the OAS (Ordine Assistenti Sociali). The first theme it dealt with concerns spheres of professional engagement and the most relevant types of users whom social workers encounter depending on territorial context and work seniority. The other two themes concern working conditions, analysed according to activities actually carried out, and the interests that social workers show in these activities. On the whole, we found a national situation characterized, on one hand, by a wide plurality of working areas corresponding to the increasing plurality of types of users, and on the other hand, by elements of substantial homogeneity, concerning both the types of intervention actually carried out, and, above all, concerning the subjective importance they gave to them. In particular, the respondents gave high priority to the nature and quality of the relationship with the users of social services.
BifulcoL.CentemeriL. (2008) ‘Governance and Participation in Local Welfare: The Case of the Italian Piani di Zona’, Social Policy and Administration42(3): 211–27.
2.
CacioppoM.Tognetti BordognaM. (2010) ‘Lo sviluppo di carriera, il rapporto con i superiori e le altre figure professionali’, in FacchiniC. (ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare, pp. 203–24. Bologna: Il Mulino.
3.
CampaniniA. (2007) ‘Social Work in Italy’, European Journal of Social Work10(1): 107–16.
4.
CampaniniA.FortunatoV. (2008) ‘The Role of the Social Work in the Light of the Italian Welfare Reform’, in FortunatoV.FriesenhahnG.KantowiczE. (eds) Social Work in Restructured European Welfare Systems, pp. 27–40. Rome: Carocci.
5.
CarabelliG.FacchiniC. (eds) (2011) Il modello lombardo di Wefare. Continuità, riassestamenti, prospettive. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
6.
Cnoas-Censis (ed.) (1999) Essere protagonisti del futuro. Scenari di sviluppo per il ruolo degli assistenti sociali. Rome: Fondazione Censis.
CorposantoC.FazziL. (2005) Il servizio sociale in un’epoca di cambiamento: nodi, problemi, prospettive. Rome: Eiss.
9.
CostaG. (ed.) (2008) La solidarietà frammentata, Le leggi regionali sul welfare a confronto. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
10.
Diomede CaneviniM. (2005) ‘Storia del servizio sociale’, in Dal Pra PonticelliM. (ed.) Dizionario del servizio sociale, pp. 657–67. Rome: Carocci.
11.
DominelliL. (2004) Social Work: Theory and Practice for a Changing Profession. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
DonatiP.ColozziI. (2005) La sussidiarietà. Che cos’è, come funziona. Rome: Carocci.
13.
EvansT. (2010) Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. Farnham: Ashgate.
14.
FacchiniC. (2010a) ‘Gli assistenti sociali come punto nodale del sistema di welfare. Motivi e metodologia della ricerca. Introduzione’, in FacchiniC. (ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare, pp. 31–72. Bologna: Il Mulino.
15.
FacchiniC. (2010b) ‘L’attività lavorativa: ruolo dell’organizzazione e centralità dell’utenza’, in FacchiniC. (ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare, pp. 159–84. Bologna: Il Mulino.
16.
FacchiniC. (2010c) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare. Bologna: Il Mulino.
17.
FacchiniC.Tonon GiraldoS. (2010) ‘La formazione degli assistenti sociali: motivazioni, percorsi, valutazioni’, in FacchiniC. (ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetto del Welfare, pp. 31–73. Bologna: Il Mulino.
18.
FargionS. (2008) ‘Reflections on Social Work’s Identity: International Themes in Italian Practitioners’ Representation of Social Work’, International Social Work2: 206–19.
19.
FergusonH. (2008) ‘Liquid Social Work: Welfare Interventions as Mobile Practices’, British Journal of Social Work3: 561–79.
20.
FerreraM. (2005) The Boundaries of Welfare. European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Figueira-McDonoughJ. (2007) The Welfare State and Social Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
FioreB.PuccioR. (2010) ‘Quanto vale una professione “altruista”? I mutamenti nella regolazione dei rapporti di lavoro’, in FacchiniC.(ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare, pp. 143–58. Bologna: Il Mulino.
23.
GoriC. (ed.) (2005) La riforma dei servizi sociali in Italia. L’attuazione della 328 e le sfide future. Rome: Carocci.
24.
Istat (2007) La seconda indagine censuaria sugli interventi e i servizi sociali dei Comuni. Rome: Istat.
25.
KazepovY. (ed.) (2009) La dimensione territoriale delle politiche sociali in Italia. Rome: Carocci.
26.
KazepovY. (2010) Rescaling Social Policies towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Public Policy and Social Welfare. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
27.
KesslF. (2009) ‘Critical Reflexivity, Social Work and the Emerging European Post-welfare State’, European Journal of Social Work12(3): 305–18.
28.
LipskyM. (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation (orig. 1980).
29.
LorenzW. (2006a) ‘Education for the Social Profession’, in LyonsK.LawrenceS. (eds) Social Work in Europe: Educating for Change, pp. 39–57. Birmingham: Venture Press.
30.
LorenzW. (2006b) Perspectives on European Social Work: From the Birth of the Nation State to the Impact of Globalisation. Leverkusen and Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
31.
LymberyM. (2003) ‘Negotiating the Contradictions between Competence and Creativity in Social Work Education’, Journal of Social Work3(1): 99–117.
32.
NaldiniM. (2003) The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare States. London: Frank Cass Publisher.
33.
RanciC.AscoliU. (2002) Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix. The New Structure of the Welfare in an Era of Privatization. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
34.
RedmondB.GuerinS.DevittC. (2008) ‘Attitudes, Perceptions and Concerns of Student Social Workers: First Two Years of a Longitudinal Study’, Social Work Education27(8): 866–82.
35.
SaracenoC. (ed.) (2002) Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe. Bristol: Policy Press.
36.
SchönD.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
37.
StameN.Lo PrestiV.FerrazzaD. (2010) Segretariato sociale e riforma dei servizi. Percorsi di valutazione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
38.
StevensM.SharpE.MorartyJ.ManthorpeJ.HusseinS.OrmeJ.McyntyreJ.CavanaghK.Green-ListerT.CristB.R. (2010) ‘Helping Others or a Rewarding Career? Investigating Student Motivations to Train as Social Workers in England’, Journal of Social Work, online (accessed 22 November 2010).
39.
ThomasA. (2004) ‘The Rise of Social Cooperatives in Italy’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations15(3): 243–63.
40.
TrivellatoP.LorenzW. (2010) ‘Una professione in movimento’, in FacchiniC.(ed.) Tra impegno e professione. Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare, pp. 249–78. Bologna: Il Mulino.
