From time to time universities in the Global North teach social work in the Global South. This article describes and discusses pedagogical aspects of such projects, focusing on teaching styles and strategies developed. Nine interviews with Swedish teachers with experience of teaching in Iraqi Kurdistan were conducted. The teachers had different methods of mastering the teaching situations and three major styles were identified, referred to in this article as guide, therapeutic and Socratic.
AminS. (1993) ‘The Challenge of Globalism: Delinking’, in South Centre (South Commission)Facing the Challenge: Responses to the Report of the South Commission. London: Zed Books.
2.
CharmazK. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
FoxD. (1983) ‘Personal Theories of Teaching’, Studies in Higher Education8(2): 151–63.
5.
GrayM. (2005) ‘Dilemmas of International Social Work: Paradoxical Processes in Indigenisation, Universalism and Imperialism’, International Journal of Social Welfare14: 231–8.
6.
GrayM.FookJ. (2004) ‘The Quest for a Universal Social Work: Some Issues and Implications’, Social Work Education23(5): 625–44.
7.
HealyL.M. (2008) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World. New York: Oxford University Press.
IASSW/IFSW (2004) ‘Global Standards for the Education and Training of the Social Work Profession’, final document adopted at the General Assemblies of IASSW & IFSW, Adelaide, Australia.
JukesM.VasselN. (2009) ‘Delivering a learning disability education program in India’, Learning Disability Practice12(9): 21–5.
12.
KangasO.PalmeJ. (2009) ‘Making Social Policy Work for Economic Development: The Nordic Experience’, International Journal of Social Welfare18: S62–S72.
13.
KarchenasM.MoghadamV.M. (2009) ‘Bringing Social Policy Back In: A Look at the Middle East and North Africa’, International Journal of Social Welfare18: S52–S61.
14.
KraghS.BislevU. (2005) ‘Universities and Student Values Across Nations’, Journal of Intercultural Communication9: 1–17.
MeeuwisseA.SwärdH. (2009) ‘Social Work Programmes in the Social Democratic Welfare Regime’, International Journal of Social Welfare18: 365–74.
17.
MericourtB. (2001) ‘Unequal but Mutually Beneficial Partnerships in Social. Development: A Case Example’, Social Development Issues23(3): 43–9.
18.
NeumanL.W. (2006) Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, MA: Pearson.
19.
Nuttman-ShwartzO.BergerR. (2012) ‘Field Education in International Social Work: Where We Are and Where We Should Go’, International Social Work55(2): 225–43.
20.
PetterssonU. (2001) Socialt arbete, politik och professionalisering. Den historiska utvecklingen. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
TryggedS. (2010) ‘Balancing the Global and the Local: Some Normative Reflections on International Social Work’, International Social Work53(5): 644–55.
23.
TunneyK.J. (2007) ‘Teaching at the Intersection’, in BorrmannS.KlassenM.SpatscheckC. (eds) International Social Work, pp. 151–64. Opladen: Barbara Budrish Publisher.
24.
UNDP (2004) ‘Iraq Living Conditions Survey 2004’, Volume 1, Tabulation Report, Table 1.6: Age in broad groups, mean and median age.
