This study explored a social partnership between Ghanaian and US universities. Through qualitative narratives, participants reported the partnership developed professional and social relationships, but cited problems in preparedness. Findings point to the importance of faculty perceptions in developing academic partnerships and the need for strong relationships in early phases of social partnerships.
BilletS.OvensC.ClemansA.SeddonT. (2007) ‘Collaborative Working and Contested Practices: Forming, Developing, and Sustaining, Social Partnerships in Education’, Journal of Education Policy22(6): 637–56.
2.
CardiniA. (2006) ‘An Analysis of the Rhetoric and Practice of Educational Partnerships in the UK: An Arena of Complexities, Tensions, and Power’, Journal of Education Policy21(4): 393–415.
3.
CoffieldF. (2000) ‘Lifelong Learning as a Lever on Structural Change? Evaluation of White Paper: Learning to Succeed: A New Framework for Post-16 Learning’, Journal of Education Policy15(2): 237–46.
4.
CookB.KothariU. (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny. London: Zed Books.
5.
CowanD.BadriA.E.SwansonN.W. (2004) ‘Entering a Third Decade: Ahfad University for Women–Iowa State University Sustainable Linkage Model’, The Ahfad Journal21(2): 43–57.
6.
FieldJ. (2000) ‘Governing the Ungovernable: Why Lifelong Learning Promises So Much Yet Delivers So Little’, Educational Management & Administration28(3): 249–61.
7.
HickeyS.MohanG. (2004) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring new Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Books.
8.
JoubertL. (2006) ‘Academic-Practice Partnerships in Practice Research: A Cultural Shift for Health Social Workers’, Social Work in Health Care43: 151–61.
9.
KezarA. (2006) ‘Redesigning for Collaboration in Learning Initiatives: An Examination of Four Highly Collaborative Campuses’, Journal of Higher Education77: 804–38.
10.
LambertM.J.BarleyD.E. (2002) ‘Research Summary on the Therapeutic Relationship and Psychotherapy Outcome’, in NorcrossJ.C. (ed.) Psychotherapy Relationships That Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
LaskerR.D.WeissE.S.MillerR. (2001) ‘Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage’, Milbank Quarterly79: 179–205.
MikheevV.A.MikheevA.V. (2004) ‘Social Partnership in the Sphere of Education’, Russian Education & Society46: 65–78.
15.
MoseleyW.G. (2007) ‘Collaborating in the Field, Working for Change: Reflecting on Partnerships between Academics, Development Organizations, and Rural Communities in Africa’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography28: 334–47.
16.
NeimeyerR.HoganN. (2002) ‘Quantitative or Qualitative? Measurement Issues in the Study of Grief’, in Stroebe et al.M. (eds) Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, Coping and Care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Press.
17.
SamoilovichD. (1993) ‘Networks in International Co-operation: The Experience of Project Columbus’, European Journal of Education28(1): 19–29.
18.
SeddonT.BilletS.ClemansA. (2005a) ‘Navigating Social Partnerships in VET: Central Agencies-Local Networks’, British Journal of Sociology of Education26(5): 567–84.
19.
SeddonT.ClemansA.BillettS. (2005b) ‘Social Partnerships: Practices, Paradoxes and Prospects of Local Learning Networks’, Australian Educational Researcher32: 25–38.
20.
SelskyJ.ParkerB. (2010) ‘Platforms for Cross-sector Social Partnerships: Prospective Sensemaking Devices for Social Benefit’, Journal of Business Ethics94: 21–37.
21.
SiegelD.J. (2010a) Organizing for Social Partnership: Higher Education in Cross-sector Collaboration. New York: Routledge.
22.
SiegelD.J. (2010b) ‘Why Universities Join Cross-Sector Social Partnerships: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement14: 33–62.
23.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
