In this article, we attempt to conduct a critical analysis of the joint IFSW and IASSW social work definition by re-reading it from the perspective of the relational paradigm. Our hypothesis is that if we adopt a precise position that focuses on the essentials, rather than seeking to pull together different and sometimes discordant perspectives, it might be possible to overcome some discrepancies and difficulties evident in the current definition. The intention is to identify the core of social work without undermining the ‘paradigmatic openness’ of it.
ArcherM. (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarnesM. (1997) Care, Communities and Citizens. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
3.
BarnesM.BowlR. (2001) Taking Over the Asylum: Empowerment and Mental Health. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4.
BartlettH. (1958) ‘Working Definition of Social Work Practice’, Social Work3(2): 5–8.
5.
BeresfordP.CroftS. (2004) ‘Service Users and Practitioners Reunited: The Key Component for Social Work Reform’, British Journal of Social Work34: 53–68.
6.
BASW (1997) The Code of Ethics for Social Work, rev. edn.Birmingham: BASW.
7.
DominelliL. (2002) Anti-oppressive Social Work: Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
DominelliL. (2004) Social Work: Theory and Practice for a Changing Profession. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
DonatiP. (2007) ‘Birth and Development of the Relational Theory of Society: A Journey Looking for a Deep “Relational Sociology”’. Available online at:http://www.relationalstudies.net (accessed 19 October 2011).
10.
DonatiP. (2010) Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
11.
FergusonH. (2001) ‘Social Work, Individualization and Life Politics’, British Journal of Social Work31(1): 41–55.
12.
FolgheraiterF. (2004) Relational Social Work: Toward Networking and Societal Practices. London: Jessica Kinsley.
13.
FolgheraiterF. (2007) ‘Relational Social Work: Principles and Practices’, Social Policy and Society6(2): 265–74.
14.
HareI. (2004) ‘Defining Social Work for the 21st Century. The International Federation of Social Workers’ Revised Definition of Social Work’, International Social Work47(3): 407–24.
15.
HealyL.M. (2008) ‘Exploring the History of Social Work as a Human Rights Profession’, International Social Work51(6): 735–48.
16.
HutchingsA.TaylorI. (2007) ‘Defining the profession? Exploring an international definition of social work in the China context’, International Journal of Social Welfare16 (4): 382–390.
17.
IFSW and IASSW (2004) ‘Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles’. Available online at: http://www.ifsw.org/f38000032.html (accessed 19 October 2011).
18.
IllichI. (1977) Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars Publ. Ltd.
19.
LevinasE. (1972) Humanisme de l’autre homme. English transl. Humanism of the Other. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
20.
LipskyM. (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
21.
LorenzW. (2001) ‘Social Work in Europe: Portrait of a Diverse Professional Group’, in HessleS. (ed.) International Standard Setting of Higher Social Work Education. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies of Social Work.
22.
MurdochA. (2011) ‘Is Social Work a Human Rights Profession?’, Social Work56(3): 193–288.
23.
O’BrienM. (2011) ‘Social Justice: Alive and Well (Partly) in Social Work Practice?’, International Social Work54(2): 174–90.
24.
ParsloeP. (1996) Pathways to Empowerment. Birmingham: Venture Press.
25.
PartonN.O’ByrneP. (2000) Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
PettersenT.HemM.H. (2011) ‘Mature Care and Reciprocity: Two Cases from Acute Psychiatry’, Nursing Ethics18(2): 217–31.
27.
PutnamR.D. (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
RamsayF.R. (2003) ‘Transforming the Working Definition of Social Work into the 21st Century’, Research on Social Work Practice13(3): 324–38.
29.
RossiterA. (2011) ‘Unsettled Social Work: The Challenge of Levinas’s Ethics’, British Journal of Social Work41(5): 980–95.
30.
SchönD.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
31.
SeikkulaJ.ArnkilT.E. (2006) Dialogical Meetings in Social Networks. London: Karnac Books.
32.
SenA. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
SmithM.WhyteB. (2008) ‘Social Education and Social Pedagogy: Reclaiming a Scottish Tradition in Social Work’, European Journal of Social Work11(1): 15–18.
34.
SteinbergM.D. (2004) The Mutual-aid Approach to Working with Groups: Helping People Help One Another, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
35.
van EwijkH. (2009) ‘Citizenship-based Social Work’, International Social Work52(2): 167–79.
36.
WebbS. (2010) ‘(Re)Assembling the Left: The Politics of Redistribution and Recognition in Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work40(8): 2364–79.
