The most successful post-earthquake rehabilitation program is the one that involves the victims in their own relief, reconstruction, and rehabilitation efforts. The role of the government and NGOs is to facilitate people’s participation. This article explores the concept of coproduction in action in the 2001 post-earthquake rehabilitation in Gujarat, India.
Abhiyan, N. ( 2003) Coming Together, 5th edn. Bhuj, India: Kutch Nav Nirman Abhiyan .
2.
Anderson, J. and B. Clary ( 1987) ‘Coproduction in Emergency Medical Services’ , Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly16: 33-42.
3.
Barakat, S. ( 2003) Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute.
4.
Barenstein, J.D. ( 2006) Housing Rehabilitation in Post-earthquake Gujarat: A Comparative Analysis. London: Humanitarian Practice Network at Overseas Development Institute.
5.
Barenstein, J.D. ( 2008) From Gujarat to Tamil Nadu: Coproduction vs. Non-Coproduction Housing Reconstruction in India. Manno, Switzerland: World Habitat Research Unit, University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland .
6.
Brudney, J.L. and R.E. England ( 1983) ‘Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept’ , Public Administration Review43(1): 59-65.
7.
Davidson, C.H., C. Johnson, G. Lizarralde, N. Dikmen and A. Sliwinski ( 2007) ‘Truths and Myths About Community Participation in Post-disaster Housing Projects’, Habitat International31: 100-15.
8.
Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) (2001) The DEC Response to the Earthquake in Gujarat, January-October 2001, vols 1-3. London: DEC.
9.
Dodds, I. ( 2002) Time to Move to a More Peaceful and Equitable Solution , IFSW News.
10.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) ( 2005) Earthquake Rebuilding in Gujarat, India. Oakland, CA: EERI.
11.
Enarson, E. ( 2001) We Want Work: Rural Women in the Gujarat Drought and Earthquake . Retrieved 15 March 2007, from www.anglia.ac.uk/geography/radix/gujarat.htm
12.
Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A.G. Lang and A. Buchner ( 2007) ‘Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses’, Behavior Research Methods41(4): 1149-60.
13.
Franda, M. ( 1983) Voluntary Associations and Local Development: The Janata Phase. New Delhi: Young Asia Publishers .
14.
Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority (GSDMA) ( 2001) Gujarat Earthquake Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Policy . Retrieved 10 June 2006, from www.gsdma.org
15.
Jigyasu, R. ( 2001) ‘From Marathwada to Gujarat: Emerging Challenges in Postearthquake Rehabilitation for Sustainable Eco Development in South Asia’. Retrieved 12 June 2007, from http://www.grif.umontreal.ca/pages/i-rec%20papers/rohit.PDF
16.
Ministry of Home Affairs (2002) Disaster Management - The Development Perspective: An Extract of the Chapter in the Tenth Five-year Plan Document (2002-2007). New Delhi : National Disaster Management Division.
17.
Nakagawa, Y. and R. Shaw ( 2004) ‘Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery’ , International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters22(1): 5-34.
18.
National Association of Social Workers (NASW) ( 2006) General Facts about Social Work. Retrieved August 2010, from http://www.socialworkers.org/pressroom/swMonth/2009/swfacts.asp
19.
Ostrom, E. ( 1996) ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development’, World Development24(6): 1073-87.
20.
Pascoe, G.C. and C.C. Attkisson ( 1983) ‘The Evaluation Ranking Scale: A New Methodology for Assessing Satisfaction’, Evaluation and Program Planning6: 335-47.
21.
Percy, S. ( 1987) ‘Citizen Involvement in Coproducing Safety and Security in the Community’, Public Productivity Review10(42): 83-93.
22.
Prasai, S. ( 2002) Gujarat Earthquake: Planning Concerns in Post-disaster Development (Department of Urban and Regional Planning). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Press.
23.
Ravichandran, N., S. Rajashree, Y. Sathyapriya and A. Jain ( 2006) ‘Perspectives on Non-profit Mission and Financing in India’, Journal of Health Management8(2): 207-27.
24.
Samaddar, S. and N. Okada ( 2006) ‘Participatory Approach for Postearthquake Reconstruction in the Villages of Kachchh, India’, Annuals of Disasters49: 197-205.
25.
Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana (SUPSI) (2005) A Comparative Analysis of Six Housing Reconstruction Approaches in Postearthquake Gujarat. Zurich: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
26.
Shaw, R. ( 2003) ‘Role of Non-government Organizations in Earthquake Disaster Management: An Asian Perspective’, Regional Development Dialogue24(1): 117-29.
27.
Spiegel, H.B. ( 1987) ‘Coproduction in the Context of Neighborhood Development’ , Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly16: 54-61.
28.
Twigg, J. ( 2002) NGO Natural Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness Activities . London: British Red Cross.
29.
United Nations (2002) Report on Recommendations for the Enhancement of Early Warning Systems at International, Regional, National and Sub-national Levels. New York: UN.
30.
Warren, R. ( 1987) ‘Coproduction, Volunteerism, Privatization and the Public Interest’, Journal of Voluntary Action Research2(1): 5-10.
31.
World Bank and Asian Development Bank (2001 ) Gujarat Earthquake Recovery Program: Assessment Report. New York: World Bank and Asian Development Bank.
32.
Wu, J.Y. and M.K. Lindell ( 2004) ‘Housing Reconstruction After Two Major Earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge Earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan’, Disasters28(1): 63-81.
