Indigenization is a key issue in the development of professional social work in China. Chinese social work scholars have adopted the century-old conceptual formulation of ‘Chinese corpus, western application’ to balance the need for western knowledge and the need for intellectual autonomy. This article explores major current debates on ideology, teleology, epistemology and technology within the social work profession in the West and their implications for social work development in China.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, M. (1998) ‘Social Work and Social Reform: an Arena of Struggle’, Social Work43(6): 512-526.
2.
Abramovitz, M. and D. R. Bardill (1993) ‘Should All Social Work Students Be Educated for Social Change?’, Journal of Social Work Education29: 6-18.
3.
Allen-Meares, P. and B. A. Lane (1987) ‘Grounding Social Work Practice in Theory: Ecosystems’, Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work68(9): 515-521.
4.
Berg, W. E., and R. Wright (1980) ‘Program Funding as an Organizational Dilemma: Goal Displacement in Social Work Programs’, Administration in Social Work4(4): 29-39.
5.
Brekke, J. S. (1986) ‘Scientific Imperatives in Social Work Research: Pluralism Is Not Skepticism’, Social Service Review (December): 538-554.
6.
Chambon, A. and A. Irving, eds (1994) Essays on Postmodernism and Social Work. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
7.
Chan, R. K. H. and M. S. Tsui (1997) ‘Notions of the Welfare State in China Revisited’, International Social Work40: 177-189.
8.
Cheng, W. M. (1996) ‘Jingji zhuanxing shiqi shehui gongzuo mianlin de tiaozhan’ (‘The Challenges for Social Work in a Period of Economic Transformation’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 19-25. Beijing: Heping.
9.
Cheung, K. W. (1999) ‘Three Discourses of Chinese Socialism, Three Educational Discourses in China’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, April, Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).
10.
Chow, N. W. S. (1987) ‘Western and Chinese Ideas of Social Welfare’, International Social Work30: 31-41.
11.
Compton, B. R. and B. Galaway (1999) Social Work Process, 6thedn.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12.
DeRoos, Y. S. (1990) ‘The Development of Practice Wisdom Through Human Problem-solving Processes’, Social Service Review (June): 276-287.
13.
Dixon, J. (1981) The Chinese Welfare System 1949-1979. New York: Praeger.
14.
Epstein, L. (1994) ‘The Therapeutic Idea in Contemporary Society’, in A. S. Chambon and A. Irving (eds) Essays on Postmodernism and Social Work, pp. 3-15. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
15.
Epstein, L. (1999) ‘The Culture of Social Work’, in A. S. Chambon, A. Irving and L. Epstein (eds) Reading Foucault For Social Work, pp. 3-26. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Erlandson, D. A., E. L. Harris, B. L. Skipper and S. D. Allen (1993) ‘Quality Criteria for a Naturalistic Study’, in Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods, pp. 131-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Fraser, M., M. Taylor, R. Jackson and J. O’Jack (1991) ‘Social Work and Science: Many Ways of Knowing?’, Social Work Research and Abstracts27: 5-15.
18.
Freidson, E. (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Gambrill, E. (1997) ‘Thinking About Knowledge and How To Get It’. Paper presented at the Ninth Symposium on Doctoral Research in Social Work, 18 April. Columbus, OH.
20.
Germain, C. B. (1979) ‘Introduction: Ecology and Social Work’, in C. B. Germain (ed.) Social Work Practice: People and Environment: An Ecological Perspective, pp. 1-22. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Germain, C. B. (1980) ‘Social Work Identity, Competence, and Autonomy: the Ecological Perspective’, Social Work in Health Care6(1): 1-11.
22.
Goldstein, H. (1986) ‘Toward the Integration of Theory and Practice: a Humanistic Approach’, Social Work31: 352-357.
23.
Goode, W. J. (1969) ‘The Theoretical Limits of Professionalization’, in A. Etzioni (ed.) The Semi-Professions and their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers, pp. 266-313. New York: The Free Press.
24.
Gordon, W. E. (1962) ‘A Critique of the Working Definition’, Social Work7(4): 3-13.
25.
Greenwood, E. V. J. (1957) ‘Attributes of a Profession’, Social Work2 (July): 45-55.
26.
Han, M. M. (1996) ‘Lun fazhan juyou Zhongguo xueshu tezheng de shehui gongzuo jiaoyu-shehui gongzuo jiaoyu bentuhua wenti’ (‘On the Development of Social Work Education with Chinese Academic Characteristics: The Issue of Indigenization of Social Work Education’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 203-207. Beijing: Heping.
27.
Hartman, A. (1993) ‘Editorial: The Professional is Political’, Social Work38(4): 365-366, 504.
28.
Haworth, G. O. (1991) ‘My Paradigm Can Beat Your Paradigm: Some Reflections on Knowledge Conflicts’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare28: 35-50.
29.
Heineman, M. B. (1981) ‘The Obsolete Scientific Imperative in Social Work Research’, Social Service Review55: 371-397.
30.
Huang, X. L. (1996) ‘Shehui gongzuo bentuhua wenti chutan’ (‘Preliminary Inquiry on the Issue of Indigenization of Social Work’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 207-210. Beijing: Heping.
31.
Hudson, W. H. (1982) ‘Scientific Imperatives in Social Work Research and Practice’, Social Service Review56: 246-258.
32.
Hugman, R. (1996) ‘Professionalization in Social Work: the Challenge of Diversity’, International Social Work39: 131-147.
33.
Ife, J. (1997) Rethinking Social Work: Towards Critical Practice. Melbourne: Longman.
34.
Johnson, T. (1993) ‘Expertise and the State’, in M. Gane and T. Johnson (eds) Foucault’s New Domain, pp. 139-152. London: Routledge.
35.
Karger, H. J. (1983) ‘Science, Research and Social Work: Who Controls the Profession?’Social Work (May-June): 200-205.
36.
Leonard, P. (1997) Postmodern Welfare. London: Sage.
37.
Leung, J. (1996) ‘Jingji ji shehui bianqian zhong de shehui gongzuo jiaoyu’ (‘Social Work Education in the Middle of Economic and Social Change’), in S. B. Wang, J. J. P. Leung and T. K. Mok (eds) Zhongguo Shehui Fuli (Chinese Social Welfare), pp. 307-320. Hong Kong: Zhong Hua.
38.
Li, B. F. (1992) ‘Bimu ci’ (‘Closing Address’), Shehui Gongzuo Yanjiu Zazhi zengkan: jiushi niandai de Zhongguo shehui gongzuo-yijiujiuer nian yantaohui lunwenji(Chinese Social Work in the Nineties: Proceedings of the 1992 Conference) (Supplementary issue of Social Work Research), pp. 6-16. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuozhe Xiehui, Minzhengbu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Yanjiu Zhongxin (China Social Workers’ Association, Ministry of Civil Affairs Social Work Education Research Centre).
39.
Lichtman, R. (1990) ‘The Production of Human Nature by Means of Human Nature’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism4: 13-51.
40.
Lightman, E. (1990) ‘Conditionality and Social Assistance: Market Values and the Work Ethic’, in G. Riches and G. W. Ternowetsky (eds) Unemployment and Welfare, pp. 91-105. Toronto: Garamond Press.
41.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1985) ‘Establishing Trustworthiness’, Naturalistic Inquiry, pp. 289-330. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Lu, S. Z. (1996) ‘Zhongguo shehui gongzuo fazhan de sikao’ (‘Thoughts on Social Work Development in China’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 31-36. Beijing: Heping.
43.
Margolin, L. (1997) Under The Cover of Kindness: The Invention of Social Work, 1st edn.Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
44.
Midgley, J. (1981) Professional Imperialism: Social Work in the Third World. London: Heinemann.
45.
Nes, J. and P. Iadicola (1989) ‘Toward a Definition of Feminist Social Work: a Comparison of Liberal, Radical and Socialist Models’, Social Work24(1): 12-21.
46.
Padgett, D. K. (1998) ‘Does the Glove Really Fit? Qualitative Research and Clinical Social Work Practice’, Social Work43(4): 373-380.
47.
Payne, M. (1991) Modern Social Work Theory: a Critical Introduction. Chicago, IL: Lyceum.
48.
Payne, M. (1997) ‘The Three Pillars of Social work’. Paper presented at the China Social Work Education Association Annual Conference.
49.
Payne, M. (1998) ‘Why Social Work? Comparative Perspectives on Social Issue and Response Formation’, International Social Work41(4): 443-453.
50.
Phillips, D. C. (1992) The Social Scientist’s Bestiary: A Guide to and Defences of Naturalistic Social Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
51.
Pike, C. K. (1996) ‘Development and Initial Validation of the Social Work Values Inventory’, Research on Social Work Practice6(3): 337-352.
52.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992) ‘Postmodern Epistemology of Practice’, in S. Kvale (ed.) Psychology and Postmodernism, pp. 146-165. London: Sage.
53.
Popple, P. R. (1985) ‘The Social Work Profession: a Reconceptualization’, Social Service Review (December): 561-577.
54.
Popple, P. R. (1992) ‘Social Work: Social Function and Moral Purpose’, in N. P. Reid and P. R. Popple (eds) The Moral Purposes of Social Work: The Character and Intention of a Profession, 1st edn, pp. 141-154. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
55.
Popple, P. R. (1995) ‘Social Work Profession: History’, Encyclopedia of Social Work, 19thedn, Vol. 3, pp. 2282-2292. Washington, DC: NASW.
56.
Popple, P. R. and L. Leighninger (1998) The Policy-Based Profession. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
57.
Reisch, M. (1998) ‘The Sociopolitical Context and Social Work Method, 1890-1950’, Social Service Review (June): 161-181.
58.
Richmond, M. E. (1917) Social Diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
59.
Rieff, P. (1966) The Triumph of the Therapeutic. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
60.
Roberts, R. (1990) Lessons From the Past: Issues For Social Work Theory. London: Routledge.
61.
Rodwell, M. K. (1987) ‘Naturalistic Inquiry: an Alternative Model for Social Work Assessment’, Social Service Review61: 231-246.
62.
Rose, N. I. C. F. (1996) ‘Power and Subjectivity: Critical History and Psychology’, in C. F. Graumann and K. J. Gergen (eds) Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse, pp. 103-124. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Rosen, A. (1994) ‘Knowledge Use in Direct Practice’, Social Service Review (December): 561-577.
64.
Scott, D. (1989) ‘Meaning Construction and Social Work Practice’, Social Service Review63: 39-51.
65.
Shaddish, W. R. (1995) ‘Philosophy of Science and the Quantitative-Qualitative Debates: Thirteen Common Errors’, Evaluation and Program Planning8(1): 63-75.
66.
Sherman, E. (1987) ‘Hermeneutics, Human Science, and Social Work’, Social Thought (Winter): 34-41.
67.
Shi, T. E. (1996) ‘Chuantong wenhua yu shehui gongzuo’ (‘Traditional Culture and Social Work’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 177-181. Beijing: Heping.
68.
Siporin, M. (1975) Introduction to Social Work Practice. New York: Macmillan.
69.
Souflee, J. F. (1993) ‘A Metatheoretical Framework for Social Work Practice’. Social Work38(3): 317-330.
70.
Specht, H. and M. E. Courtney (1994) Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Abandoned Its Mission, 1st edn.New York: The Free Press.
71.
Sun, L. Y. (1996) ‘Shehui gongzuo de zhuanyehua ji shehui gongzuo jiaoyu zai shehui gongzuo zhuanyehua guocheng zhong de zuoyong’ (‘Social Work Professionalization and the Function of Social Work Education in the Process of Social Work Professionalization’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 241-246. Beijing: Heping.
72.
Thyer, B. (1996) ‘Forty Years of Progress Toward Empirical Clinical Practice?’, Social Work Research20: 77-79.
73.
Tsang, A. K. T. (2000) ‘Bridging the Gap between Clinical Practice and Research: An Integrated Practice-oriented Model’, Journal of Social Service Research26(4): 69-90.
74.
Wakefield, J. and S. Kirk (1996) ‘Unscientific Thinking about Scientific Practice: Evaluating the Scientist-Practitioner Model’, Social Work Research20: 83-94.
75.
Wakefield, J. C. (1996a) ‘Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective?’ Part 1, ‘Is the Perspective Clinically Useful?’, Social Service Review70(1): 1-32.
76.
Wakefield, J. C. (1996b) ‘Does Social Work Need the Eco-Systems Perspective?’ Part 2, ‘Does the Perspective Save Social Work from Incoherence?’, Social Service Review70(2): 183-213.
77.
Wakefield, J. C. (1998) ‘Foucauldian Fallacies: an Essay Review of Leslie Margolin’s Under the Cover of Kindness’, Social Service Review72 (December): 545-587.
78.
Walder, A. G. (1986) Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Los Angeles: University of California.
79.
Walz, T. and V. Groze (1991) ‘The Mission of Social Work Revisited: an Agenda for the 1990s’, Social Work36(6): 500-504.
80.
Wang, S. B. (1998) ‘Zhongguo shehui fuli xin dongli: Zhongguo shehui gongzuo de fazhan’ (‘New Force in Chinese Social Welfare: The Development of Chinese Social Work’), in S. B. Wang, J. J. P. Leung and T. K. Mok (eds) Zhongguo Shehui Fuli (Chinese Social Welfare). Hong Kong: Zhong Hua.
81.
Wang, S. B. (1999) ‘Foreword’, in S. B. Wang, B. N. Shi, Y. Wang and H. T. Li (eds) Shehui gongzuo gailun (Introduction to Social Work), pp. 5-6. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
82.
Wenocur, S. and M. Reisch (1989) From Charity to Enterprise: The Development of American Social Work in a Market Economy, 1st edn.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
83.
Xia, X. L. (1996) ‘Zhonghua minzu chuantong wenhua dui fazhan shehui gongzuo de yiyi’ (‘The Implication of Chinese People’s Traditional Culture for the Development of Social Work’), in S. B. Wang and F. Z. Ma (eds) Fazhan, tansuo, bentuhua-Huaren shequ shehui gongzuo jiaoyu fazhan yantaohui lunwenji-Yazhou ji Taipingyang Diqu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Xiehui Zhongguo (Development, Exploration and Indigenization: Proceedings of the Chinese Community Social Work Education Development Conference, Asia-Pacific Region Social Work Education Association, Chinese Social Work Education Association), pp. 175-177. Beijing: Heping.
84.
Yan, M. C. (1997) ‘A Social Functioning Discourse in Chinese Context: Implication of Developing Social Work in Mainland China’, International Social Work40(2): 181-194.
85.
Yan, M. F. (1992) ‘Kaimu ci’ (‘Opening Address’), Shehui Gongzuo Yanjiu Zazhi zengkan: jiushi niandai de Zhongguo shehui gongzuo-yijiujiuernian yantaohui lunwenji(Chinese Social Work in the Nineties: Proceedings of the 1992 Conference) (Supplementary issue of Social Work Research), pp. 3-5. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuozhe Xiehui, Minzhengbu Shehui Gongzuo Jiaoyu Yanjiu Zhongxin (China Social Workers’ Association, Ministry of Civil Affairs Social Work Education Research Centre).
86.
Zimmerman, J. (1989) ‘Determinism, Science, and Social Work’, Social Service Review (March): 52-62.
