Participatory action research (PAR) is widely endorsed by social workers as consistent with their commitment to social justice. This paper critically appraises the applicability of PAR to the diverse organizational and cultural contexts of social welfare work. The author interrogates participatory researchers’ assertions about power, method and action. Questions are raised about the use of PAR in the Asia-Pacific region where a cultural aversion to the public expression of dissent is frequently encountered. The author argues that some of the limitations of PAR can be overcome by radically opening it to insights from practice and from postmodern theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alder, C. and D. Sandor (1990) ‘Youth Researching Youth’, Youth Studies8(3): 38-42.
2.
Brown, L. D. (1993) ‘Social Change Through Collective Reflection with Asian Nongovernmental Development Organizations’, Human Relations46: 249-273.
3.
Chataway, C. (1997) ‘An Examination of the Constraints on Mutual Inquiry in a Participatory Action Research Project’, Journal of Social Issues53(4): 747-765.
4.
Chu, K. F. and R. Carew (1990) ‘Confucianism: Its Relevance to Social Work with Chinese People’, Australian Social Work43(3): 3-9.
5.
Cixous, H. (1981) ‘Sorties’, in E. Marks and I. de Courtivron (eds) New French Feminisms: An Anthology, pp. 90-98. Sussex: Harvester Press.
6.
Cixous, H. (1994) ‘Three Steps on the Ladder of Writing’, in S. Sellers (ed.) The Hélène Cixous Reader, pp. 199-205. London: Routledge.
7.
Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. St Leonards (NSW): Allen & Unwin.
8.
Fals-Borda, O. (1987) ‘The Application of Participatory Action-Research in Latin America’, International Sociology2(4): 329-347.
9.
Finn, J. (1994) ‘The Promise of Participatory Research’, Journal of Progressive Human Services5(2): 25-42.
10.
Foucault, M. (1991) ‘On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought, pp. 340-372. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
Gatens, M. (1996) Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. London: Routledge.
12.
Gaventa, J. (1993) ‘The Powerful, the Powerless and the Experts: Knowledge Struggles in an Information Age’, in P. Park (ed.) Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, pp. 21-40. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
13.
Hall, B. (1981) ‘Participatory Research, Popular Knowledge and Power: a Personal Reflection’, Convergence14(3): 7-27.
14.
Healy, K. and K. Walsh (1997) ‘Making participatory processes visible: Practice issues in the development of a peer support network’, Australian Social Work50(3): 45-52.
15.
Herr, K. (1995) ‘Action Research as Empowering Practice’, Journal of Progressive Human Services6(2): 45-58.
16.
Hicks, S. (1997) ‘Participatory Research: an Approach for Structural Social Work’, Journal of Progressive Human Services8(2): 63-78.
17.
Lane, B. (1997) ‘A Question of Justice’, Australian Social Work50(4): 37-39.
18.
Laragy, C. (1997) ‘Social Workers in the Year 2000’, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work7(1): 47-58.
19.
Lewin, K. (1948) Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. New York: Harper Brothers Publishers.
20.
Lykes, M. B. (1988) ‘Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian Women: Critical Perspectives on Constructing Collaborative Research’, in R. Unger (ed.) Representations: Social Constructions of Gender, pp. 167-185. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
21.
Maguire, P. (1987) Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
22.
Mangam, I. (1993) ‘Conspiracies of Silence? Some Critical Comments on the Action Research Special Issue, February 1993’, Human Relations43(10): 1243-1251.
23.
Martin, J. (1998) ‘Chinese Culture and Social Work’, Australian Social Work51(2): 3-8.
24.
Mathrani, V. (1993) ‘Participatory Research: A Potential for In-Depth Understanding’, Indian Journal of Social Work54(3): 345-353.
25.
Pharr, S. (1990) Losing Face: Status Politics in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Phillips, A. (1991) Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
Rahnema, M. (1990) ‘Participatory Action Research: the “Last Temptation of Saint” Development’, Alternatives15: 199-226.
28.
Reason, P. (1994) ‘Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 324-339. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Sarri, R. and C. Sarri (1992) ‘Organizational and Community Change Through Participatory Action Research’, Administration in Social Work16(3-4): 99-122.
30.
Scott, J. (1994) ‘Deconstructing Equality-versus-difference: Or, The Uses of Post-structuralist Theory for Feminism’, in S. Seidman (ed.) The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, pp. 282-298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Selener, D. (1997) Participatory Action Research and Social Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Participatory Action Research Network.
32.
Sohng, Sung Sil Lee (1992) ‘Consumers as Research Partners’, Journal of Progressive Human Services3(2): 1-14.
33.
Sohng, Sung Sil Lee (1996) ‘Participatory research and community organizing’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare23(4): 77-97.
34.
Swantz, M. and A. Vainio-Mattila (1988) ‘Participatory Inquiry as an Instrument of Grass-roots Development,’ in P. Reason (ed.) Human Inquiry in Action Developments in New Paradigm Research, pp. 127-143. London: Sage.
35.
Swepson, P. and B. Dick (1993) ‘Action Research: Too Risky for Theses?’, paper presented at the Social Psychologists Meeting, Newcastle (Australia), April, pp. 1-10.
36.
Tandon, R. (1981) ‘Participatory Research in the Empowerment of the People’, Convergence14(3): 20-27.
37.
Tannen, D. (1998) The Argument Culture: Changing the Way We Argue and Debate. London: Virago.
38.
Tolman, D. L. and M. Brydon-Miller (1997) ‘Transforming Psychology: Interpretive and Participatory Research Methods’, Journal of Social Issues53(4): 597-603.
39.
Wagner, D. (1991) ‘Reviving the Action Research Model: Combining Case and Cause of Dislocated Workers’, Social Work36(6): 477-482.
40.
Yeatman, A. (1997) ‘Feminism and Power’, in M. L. Shanley and U. Narayan (eds) Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
