Auditor General of Canada (AGC) (1993) Program Evaluation. Ottawa: Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons.
2.
Auditor General of Canada (AGC) (1995) Regional Economic Development Programs, Chaps 17–21. Ottawa: Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons.
3.
Auditor General of Canada (AGC) (1996) Canada Infrastructure Works Program — Lessons Learned, Chap. 26. Ottawa: Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons.
4.
Auditor General of Canada (AGC) (1997) Atlantic Groundfish Fisheries, Chaps 14–16. Ottawa: Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons.
5.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1990) Implementation of Program Evaluation — Stage 1, Audit Report No. 23. Canberra: ANAO.
6.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1995) Community Development Employment Projects Scheme, Audit Report No. 6. Canberra: ANAO.
7.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1996) Customer Service — Department of Social Security, Audit Report No. 25. Canberra: ANAO.
8.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1997) Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme — Department of Health and Family Services, Audit Report No. 12. Canberra: ANAO.
9.
Barzelay, Michael (1997) ‘Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Study of Organizational Strategies in the OECD’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration10(July): 253–260.
10.
Board of Audit Japan (1997) ‘Summary Report, Sub-theme 1’, The 2nd Tokyo International Audit Forum. Tokyo: Board of Audit Japan.
11.
Broadbent, Jane and Laughlin, Richard (1997) ‘Evaluating the “New Public Management” Reforms in the UK: A Constitutional Possibility’, Public Administration75(Autumn): 487–507.
12.
Chelimsky, Eleanor (1985) ‘Comparing and Contrasting Auditing and Evaluation: Some Notes on Their Relationship’, Evaluation Review9 (Aug.): 483–503.
13.
Davis, Dwight F. (1990) ‘Do You Want a Performance Audit or a Program Evaluation?’Public Administration Review50(Jan./Feb.): 35–41.
14.
Dewar, David A (1991) ‘The Auditor General and the Examination of Policy’, in A. Friedberg, B. Geist, N. Mizrahi and I. Sharkansky (eds) State Audit and Accountability: A Book of Readings, pp. 95–102. Jerusalem: Israeli State Comptroller.
15.
Gray, Andrew , Jenkins, Bill and Glynn, John (1992) ‘Auditing the Three Es: The Challenge of Effectiveness’, Public Policy and Administration7(Winter): 56–69.
16.
Jerusalem Post, 15 April 1991.
17.
National Academy of Public Administration (1994) ‘The Roles, Mission and Operation of the US General Accounting Office’, report prepared for the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Washington, DC.
18.
National Audit Office (NAO) (1996a) The Work of the Directors General of Telecommunications, Gas Supply, Water Services and Electricity Supply. London: National Audit Office.
19.
National Audit Office (NAO) (1996b) Overseas Trade Services: Assistance to Exporters. London: National Audit Office.
20.
National Audit Office (1996c) Handling Small Claims in the County Courts. London: National Audit Office.
21.
National Audit Office State Audit in the European Union. London: National Audit Office.
22.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1996) Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government. Paris: OECD.
23.
Palumbo, Dennis J. (ed.) (1987) The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.
24.
Patton, Michael Quinn (1986) Utilization-Focused Evaluation (2nd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Roberts, Simon and Pollitt, Christopher (1994) ‘Audit or Evaluation? A National Audit Office VFM Study’, Public Administration92(4): 527–549.
26.
Sandahl, Rolf (1993) ‘Connected or Separated? Budgeting, Auditing and Evaluation in Sweden’, in A. Gray, B. Jenkins, and B. Segsworth (eds) Budgeting, Auditing and Evaluation: Functions & Integration in Seven Governments, pp. 139–162. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
27.
Schwartz, Robert (1991) ‘State Audit in Developed Democracies’, in A. Friedberg, B. Geist, N. Mizrahi and I. Sharkansky (eds) State Audit and Accountability: A Book of Readings, pp. 240–253. Jerusalem: Israeli State Comptroller.
28.
Schwartz, Robert (forthcoming) ‘State Audit — Panacea for the Crisis of Accountability? An Empirical Study of the Israeli Case’, International Journal of Public Administration23(2).
29.
Shand, David and Anand, Paul (1996) ‘Performance Auditing in the Public Sector: Approaches and Issues in OECD Member Countries’, Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government, pp. 57–78. Paris: OECD.
30.
Sharkansky, Ira (1984) ‘The Politics of Auditing Reconsidered’, Studies in State Audit38: 35–39.
31.
Sharkansky, Ira (1988) ‘Israel’s Auditor as Policy-maker’, Public Administration66 (Spring): 77–90.
32.
Sharkansky, Ira (1995) ‘Pushing the Frontiers of State Audit: Political Auditing by Israel’s State Comptroller’, International Journal of Public Administration18(12): 1841–1857.
33.
Sinclair, Sonja (1979) Cordial But Not Cosy: A History of the Office of the Auditor General. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
34.
State Comptroller’s Office (SCO) (1995) ‘Reform of Technological Education’, Jerusalem: Annual Report45: 309–334.
35.
State Comptroller’s Office (SCO) (1996a) ‘Build Your Own Apartment’, Jerusalem: Annual Report46: 118–132.
36.
State Comptroller’s Office (SCO) (1996b) ‘Investment Aid to Enterprises and its Effects’, Jerusalem: Annual Report46: 585–591.
37.
Sutherland, Sharon L. (1986) ‘The Politics of Audit: The Federal Office of the Auditor General in Comparative Perspective’, Canadian Public Administration29(Spring): 118–148.
38.
Swedish National Audit Office (SNAO) (1996) Housing Benefit — A Performance Audit on an Instrument of Social and Housing Policy. Stockholm.
39.
Swedish National Audit Office (SNAO) (1997) Parental Insurance. Stockholm.
40.
Swedish National Audit Office (SNAO) (1998) Effect on Employment of the SSA and IIE Incentive Schemes. Stockholm.
41.
United States General Accounting Office (USGAO) (1989a) Enterprise Zones: Lessons from the Maryland Experience, GAO/PEMD-89–2. Washington, DC: USGAO.
42.
United States General Accounting Office (USGAO) (1989b) Education Reform: Initial Effects in Four School Districts, GAO/PEMD-89–a28. Washington, DC: USGAO.
43.
United States General Accounting Office (USGAO) (1996) Homeownership: Mixed Results and High Costs Raise Concerns About HUD’s Mortgage Assignment Program, GAO/RCED-96–2. Washington, DC: USGAO.
44.
Weiss, Carol H. (1970) ‘The Politicization of Evaluation Research’, Journal of Social Issues26: 57–68.
45.
Weiss, Carol H. (1973) ‘Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet’, Evaluation1: 37–45.
46.
Weiss, Carol H. (1988) ‘Evaluation for Decisions: Is Anybody There? Does Anybody Care?’, Evaluation Practice9: 5–19.
47.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1972) ‘The Self-evaluating Organization’, Public Administration Review32(Sept./Oct.): 509–520.