Andrews, C. and Kouzmin, A. (1998) ‘O Discurso da Nova Administração Pública (New Public Management Discourse)’, Lua Nova45: 97–130.
2.
Anson, R. and Fox, J. (1995) ‘Studies of Education Reform: An Overview’, Phi Delta Kappan77(1): 16–18.
3.
Banks, C.A.M. (1993) ‘Re-structuring Schools for Equity: What We Have Learned in Two Decades’, Phi Delta Kappan75(1): 42–48.
4.
Bresser Pereira, L.C. (1997) ‘A Reforma do Estado nos Anos 1990: Lógica e Mecanismos de Controle (State Reform in the 1990s: Logic and Control Mechanisms)’, a paperpresented to the Second Meeting of the Montivideo Circle, Barcelona, April.
5.
Bulach, C.R. , Malone, R. and Castleman, C. (1995) ‘An Investigation of Variables Related to Student Achievement’, Mid-Western Educational Researcher8(2): 23–29.
6.
Carter, D.A. (1993) ‘Community and Parent Involvement: A Road to School Improvement’, ERS-Spectrum11(1): 39–46.
7.
Clarke, T. (1993) ‘Re-constructing the Public Sector: Performance Measurement, Quality Assurance and Social Accountability’, a paper presented at WISOC (Institut für Wirtschafts und Sozialforschung Chemnitz), Germany, May.
8.
Corcoran, T.B. and Wilson, B.L. (1985) The Secondary School Recognition Program: A First Report on 202 High Schools. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools Inc.
9.
Council of Chief State School Officers (1992) Guide to Parent Involvement Resources. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
10.
Cross, B.E. and Reitzug, U.C. (1996) ‘How to build ownership in city schools’Educational Leadership, 53(4): 16–19.
11.
Dixon, J. and Kouzmin, A. (1994) ‘The Commercialization of the Australian Public Sector: Competence, Elitism or Default in Management Education?’, International Journal of Public Sector Management7(6): 52–72.
12.
Durkheim, E. (1933) The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Edwards, P.A. and Young, L.S.J. (1992) ‘Beyond Parents, Family, Community and School Involvement’, Phi Delta Kappan74(1): 72–80.
14.
Epstein, J.L. (1995) ‘School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring For the Children We Share’, Phi Delta Kappan76(6): 701–712.
15.
Forester, J. (1988) ‘Introduction’, in J. Forester (ed.) Critical Theory and Public Life, pp. ix–ixx. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16.
Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Gilligan, C. (1995) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1—Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
19.
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2—Lifeworld and System—a Critique of Funcionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
20.
Habermas, J. (1990) ‘Justice and Solidarity: On the Discussion Concerning Stage 6’, in T.E. Wren (ed.) The Moral Domain: Essays in the On-going Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, pp. 224–251. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hirschman, A.O. (1971) A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Hollanda, S.B. de (1934/1995) Raízes do Brasil (Roots of Brazil). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
24.
Holt, A. and Murphy, P.J. (1993) ‘School Effectiveness in the Future: The Empowerment Factor’, School Organization11(3): 175–186.
25.
Kohn, A. (1993) ‘Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work’, Harvard Business Review71(5): 54–63.
26.
Osborne, B. and Gaebler, T. (1993) Re-inventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
27.
Rehg, W. (1997) Insight and Solidarity: The Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1991) ‘Theory and Methods in British Public Administration: The View From Politial Science’, Political Studies29(3): 533–554.
29.
Teixeira, H.J. and Andrews, C.W. (1997) ‘Towards Decentralization: Community Involvement in São Paulo’s Municipal School System’, a paper presented at the Round Table of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Quebec City, July, pp. 1–10.
30.
Teixeira, H.J. and Andrews, C.W. (1998) ‘Participação da Comunidade e Qualidade de Ensino: Algumas Considerações Sobre o Papel do Poder Público (Community Involvement and Quality Education: Some Considerations on the Role of the State)’,