The potential of fiscal transparency to improve tax morale (or the willingness to pay taxes) has been widely studied. However, the strength of the fiscal transparency-tax morale relationship may depend on how citizens perceive government performance and corruption. To probe these questions, this study draws on data from the World Values Survey Wave 7 (2017–2022), comprising 70,203 respondents from 48 countries, as well as various international governance indicators. The findings suggest that when individuals perceive more government corruption, fiscal transparency is associated with lower tax morale. In contrast, when individuals perceive better government performance, fiscal transparency has limited influence on tax morale. The results imply that the effect of fiscal transparency on tax morale is context dependent and, moreover, may backfire in countries with high levels of perceived corruption. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Points for practitioners
Citizens’ perceptions of government may influence their reactions to fiscal transparency. Efforts to boost willingness to pay taxes through greater fiscal transparency should also consider citizens’ views on government corruption.
AbushamsiehKLópez-HernándezAMOrtiz-RodríguezD (2014) The development of public accounting transparency in selected Arab countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences80(2): 421–442.
2.
Al-MaghrebiMSAhmadRPalilMR (2016) Budget transparency and tax awareness towards tax compliance: A conceptual approach. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economic and Law10(1): 95–101.
3.
AltJELassenDDSkillingD (2002) Fiscal transparency, gubernatorial approval, and the scale of government: Evidence from the states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly2(3): 230–250.
4.
AltJELowryRC (2010) Transparency and accountability: Empirical results for US states. Journal of Theoretical Politics22(4): 379–406.
5.
AndreoniJErardBFeinsteinJ (1998) Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature36(2): 818–860.
6.
BastidaFGuillamónMDBenitoB (2017) Fiscal transparency and the cost of sovereign debt. International Review of Administrative Sciences83(1): 106–128.
7.
BauhrMGrimesM (2014) Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance27(2): 291–320.
8.
BauhrMGrimesM (2017) Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change68(4): 431–458.
9.
BermanEM (1997) Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review57(2): 105–112.
10.
BerryWDGolderMMiltonD (2012) Improving tests of theories positing interaction. The Journal of Politics74(3): 653–671.
BrannonLATaglerMJEaglyAH (2007) The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43(4): 611–617.
13.
CapassoSCicatielloLDe SimoneE, et al. (2020) Fiscal transparency and tax ethics: Does better information lead to greater compliance?Journal of Policy Modeling43(5): 1031–1050.
14.
CheesemanNPeifferC (2023) Why efforts to fight corruption can undermine the social contract: Lessons from a survey experiment in Nigeria. Governance36(4): 1045–1061.
15.
ChenCGanapatiS (2023) Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences89(1): 257–272.
16.
CizicenoMPizzutoP (2022) Life satisfaction and tax morale: The role of trust in government and cultural orientation. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics97: 101824.
17.
CookTEGronkeP (2005) The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics67(3): 784–803.
18.
CuccinielloMBellèNNasiG, et al. (2014) Assessing public preferences and the level of transparency in government using an exploratory approach. Social Science Computer Review33(5): 571–586.
19.
DaudeCGutiérrezHMelguizoÁ (2012) What Drives Tax Morale?Paris: OECD Publishing.
20.
DaudeCMelguizoÁ (2010) Taxation and More Representation?Paris: OECD Publishing.
21.
De RenzioPMasudH (2011) Measuring and promoting budget transparency: The open budget index as a research and advocacy tool. Governance24(3): 607–616.
22.
DoerrenbergPPeichlA (2018) Tax Morale and the role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
23.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
FreyD (1986) Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology19: 41–80.
25.
GarrettRSThurberJAFritschlerAL, et al. (2006) Assessing the impact of bureaucracy bashing by electoral campaigns. Public Administration Review66(2): 228–240.
26.
GlaserMAHildrethWB (1999) Service delivery satisfaction and willingness to pay taxes: Citizen recognition of local government performance. Public Productivity & Management Review23(1): 48–67.
27.
GoldfinchSYamamotoKAoyagiS (2022) Does process matter more for predicting trust in government? Participation, performance, and process, in local government in Japan. International Review of Administrative Sciences89(3): 842–863.
28.
GrimmelikhuijsenSG (2012) Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1): 50–73.
29.
HaerpferCInglehartRMorenoA, et al. (2022) World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-pooled Datafile. Madrid & Vienna: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.
30.
HayesAF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
31.
HealdD (2012) Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?International Review of Administrative Sciences78(1): 30–49.
32.
HeisigJPSchaefferM (2019) Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review35(2): 258–279.
33.
HvidmanUAndersenSC (2016) Perceptions of public and private performance: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review76(1): 111–120.
34.
JordanMYusufJ-EMayerM, et al. (2016) What citizens want to know about their government's finances: Closing the information gap. The Social Science Journal53(3): 301–308.
35.
KamCDFranzeseRJ (2007) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36.
KingGHonakerJJosephA, et al. (2001) Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review95(1): 49–69.
37.
Knobloch-WesterwickSMothesCPolavinN (2017) Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research47(1): 104–124.
38.
KopitsGCraigJD (1998) Transparency in Government Operations. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
LordKM (2006) The Perils and Promise of Global Transparency: Why the Information Revolution May Not Lead to Security, Democracy, or Peace. Ithaca, NY: State University of New York Press.
41.
LowryRCAltJEFerreeKE (1998) Fiscal policy outcomes and electoral accountability in American states. The American Political Science Review92(4): 759–774.
42.
LuttmerEFPSinghalM (2014) Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives28(4): 149–168.
43.
Manes-RossiFAversanoNTartaglia PolciniP (2019) Popular reporting: Learning from the US Experience. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management32(1): 92–113.
44.
MarvelJD (2015a) Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti-public sector bias?International Public Management Journal18(2): 209–227.
45.
MarvelJD (2015b) Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory26(1): 143–158.
46.
MehrotraAK (2015) Reviving fiscal citizenship. Michigan Law Review113(6): 943–971.
47.
MeijerA‘t HartPWorthyB (2015) Assessing government transparency: An interpretive framework. Administration & Society50(4): 501–526.
48.
MorgesonFVPetrescuC (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences77(3): 451–479.
49.
NickersonRS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology2(2): 175–220.
50.
PeifferCAlvarezL (2016) Who will be the “principled-principals”? Perceptions of corruption and willingness to engage in anticorruption activism. Governance29(3): 351–369.
51.
PiotrowskiSJVan RyzinGG (2007) Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration37(3): 306–323.
52.
PorumbescuGA (2017) Does transparency improve citizens’ perceptions of government performance? Evidence from Seoul, South Korea. Administration & Society49(3): 443–468.
53.
PorumbescuGMeijerAGrimmelikhuijsenS (2022) Government Transparency: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SchnellS (2018) Cheap talk or incredible commitment? (mis)calculating transparency and anti-corruption. Governance31(3): 415–430.
55.
SeifertJCarlitzRMondoE (2013) The open budget index (OBI) as a comparative statistical tool. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice15(1): 87–101.
56.
SorokaSMcAdamsS (2015) News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication32(1): 1–22.
57.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 755–769.
58.
TorglerB (2004) Tax morale in Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics15(2): 237–266.
59.
TorglerB (2005) Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice122(1/2): 133–157.
60.
van den BekeromPvan der VoetJChristensenJ (2020) Are citizens more negative about failing service delivery by public than private organizations? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory31(1): 128–149.
61.
Van der MeerTGLAHameleersMKroonAC (2020) Crafting our own biased media diets: The effects of confirmation, source, and negativity bias on selective attendance to online news. Mass Communication and Society23(6): 937–967.
62.
WebberCWildavskyAB (1986) A history of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World. New York: Simon and Schuster.
63.
WuWMaLYuW (2017) Government transparency and perceived social equity: Assessing the moderating effect of citizen trust in China. Administration & Society49(6): 882–906.
64.
ZelenakL (2013) Learning to Love Form 1040: Two Cheers for the Return-based Mass Income Tax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
ZhangJLiHYangK (2022) A meta-analysis of the government performance—trust link: Taking cultural and methodological factors into account. Public Administration Review82(1): 39–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
